By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Media and Press who won E3

TRios_Zen said:
JEDE3 said:
Hyruken that's the silliest way to determine who won E3

The much better way is to just listen to your opinion, right?

It's totally cool if you didn't like MS's conference...but why is it so important to you to try to prove that your opinion is the only correct one?

On topic, I imagine the 1up and IGN's of the world will eventually get thier "who won" awards out as well.  From initial impressions, I'd guess that the majority go in the same order though, at least, that is the impression I've gotten from the sites I've read.


Who do you think votes for that kind of shit? Fanboys thats who.



Around the Network

sony won e3. Uncharted, mag, metal gear solid peace walker, god of war 3 and the last guardian. all exclusive on sony platform.s



The Ubisoft conference proves that celebrities doesn't necessarily make a good show. That is the most boring pile of crap I've seen (but last year's Nintendo show is still the worst yet). And that guy from The Soup who was the host looked at the teleprompter 90% of the time.

But it doesn't help Nintendo having people like Reggie and Cammy as hosts either. They feel so fake and awkward, like a really bad american commercial with happy fake families telling how much they love each other.

I find Don Mattick to be annoying as well with the constant clapping, dude just stop it.

The Sony host seemed natural to me, he played along when people cheered (mocked) the Hannah Montana show, and didn't take himself too seriously. Also the audience was more active than in the other conferences. The Nintendo show had a lot of awkward silence...



JEDE3 said:
Hyruken that's the silliest way to determine who won E3


How is it silly?! The fact the critics/analysts all said Microsoft, and the fact that a democratic vote on a huge gaming community website said Microsoft would lead me to believe maybe most people prefered the Microsoft one?

In contrast look at this website. Like 400 people voted for Sony as the winner. On Gamespot alone nearly 5000 people voted for the Microsoft conference. So what is silly is that you got people who have voted for the console they prefer rather then the best conference on this website. That to me is what is silly. It is laughable.



Hyruken - Gamespot is a more well known website than this one. More people go on it.... ther are more 360 owners... you don't think gamespot had fanboys voting in their poll?



Around the Network
Gilgamesh said:

This tells quite a story.



"We'll toss the dice however they fall,
And snuggle the girls be they short or tall,
Then follow young Mat whenever he calls,
To dance with Jak o' the Shadows."

Check out MyAnimeList and my Game Collection. Owner of the 5 millionth post.

outlawauron said:
Gilgamesh said:

This tells quite a story.


I think the 35 minutes worth of demoing MS did with multiplats should go towards Sonys too.



I'm not interested in motion-controlling; thus MS's Natal and Sony... thing, were insignificant to me. To me, Sony won due to having more new and interesting games.



As the only person in this thread who was actually at all three conferences, I'm going to cop out and give all three platform holders a 9 - three-way tie!

Oh, and anybody not happy with Nintendo's conference never liked Nintendo in the first place so their opinion doesn't matter! hehe



axumblade said:
Beoulve said:
The Ubisoft conference proves that celebrities doesn't necessarily make a good show. That is the most boring pile of crap I've seen (but last year's Nintendo show is still the worst yet). And that guy from The Soup who was the host looked at the teleprompter 90% of the time.

But it doesn't help Nintendo having people like Reggie and Cammy as hosts either. They feel so fake and awkward, like a really bad american commercial with happy fake families telling how much they love each other.

I find Don Mattick to be annoying as well with the constant clapping, dude just stop it.

The Sony host seemed natural to me, he played along when people cheered (mocked) the Hannah Montana show, and didn't take himself too seriously. Also the audience was more active than in the other conferences. The Nintendo show had a lot of awkward silence...

I agree with this statement though I don't think Nintendo should be dropped so low because they did have some great announcements. 

The Microsoft conference got on my nerves a little because they tried to use star power. I'm cool with seeing Ringo and Paul but I don't really care to see Yoko Ono on the show. And Steven Speilberg was just like "WTF?" But otherwise, I was a big fan of what Microsoft offered.

Ubisoft. Someone should have terminated James Cameron so he couldn't proceed to waste a half an hour of my life talking about some movie/game that he didn't even bother bringing in any footage of. I felt bad for Pele because of the technical difficulties and everything like that. I like The Soup but yeah...he wasn't the greatest host either.

1. I agree with you! It's just one of the things that brings the Nintendo conference down. I still think it was ok. But I enjoyed watching Sony and Microsoft more, mainly because they have more games I'm interested in.

 

2. That pissed me off >_< He talked about the game and movie so much that I actually looked forward to seeing a trailer or whatever, and then after listening to him blabbering for 20 minutes he walks off the stage and then it's on to the next topic, WTF??!!!!! But what they do show us is a million petz and bling glamour bitch whatever games, come on!! They didn't even show any actual gameplay from Assassin's Creed 2, yet they played the game on both Sony and Microsoft's conferences! What were they thinking? The more I think about Ubisoft's conference, I actually think it might have sucked more than Nintendo's 2008 conference...