By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - LEGEND OF ZELDA PHG REVIEWED!

definitely getting it over here on the 11th



Around the Network

Add a 8/10 from Play Magazine.



"We'll toss the dice however they fall,
And snuggle the girls be they short or tall,
Then follow young Mat whenever he calls,
To dance with Jak o' the Shadows."

Check out MyAnimeList and my Game Collection. Owner of the 5 millionth post.

Play is the most idiotic game magazine i've ever seen, well at least they gave lair a 10.



 
7/4/2007
10 out of 10
100.0%
 Game Informer
 
10/1/2007
9.5 out of 10
95.0%
 NGamer UK
 
9/1/2007
95 out of 100
95.0%
 Games Master UK
 
9/1/2007
94 out of 100
94.0%
 IGN
 
9/25/2007
9 out of 10
90.0%
 Edge Magazine UK
 
9/1/2007
9 out of 10
90.0%
 gamesTM
 
9/1/2007
9 out of 10
90.0%
 
8/14/2007
9 out of 10
90.0%
 Play Magazine
 
10/1/2007
8 out of 10
80.0%
 
8/30/2007
4 out of 5
80.0%

Play sure isn't doing anything for their credibility.  What a ridiculous excuse for a magazine.  They gave Sonic the Hedgehog a 9 then Lair a 10, Heavenly Sword a 10, and now Phantom Hourglass an 8.  

If we want to see how stupid this makes them look:

Sonic the Hedgehog industry average 4.3
Play Magazine review 9.0
Difference: +4.7

Lair industry average 5.8
Play Magazine review 10
Difference: +4.2

Heavenly Sword industry average 8.1
Play Magazine review 10
Difference: +1.1

Phantom Hourglass average score 9.1
Play Magazine review 8.0
Difference: -1.1

These guys are all over the place.   I think the SDF has more accurate reviews than Play Magazine.



To think that people were using the Lair Play review as damage control only a month ago...feels like it was ages ago.



Tag - "No trolling on my watch!"

Around the Network

Lets forget about Lair ok? No since on beating a dead dragon. IGN could have burhaps bumped up the score to 9,5 from what i've read.



"You won't find Adobe here in Nairobi"


 

if Play Mag is so out of place, shouldn't their reviews be yanked from the avg scores?
what qualifications are there before your review can be among the scores?



I bet Gamespot will give it like a 7... max an 8.

If I had a DS I would buy this game... but I don't have one, so no.



naznatips said:

 
7/4/2007
10 out of 10
100.0%
Game Informer
 
10/1/2007
9.5 out of 10
95.0%
NGamer UK
 
9/1/2007
95 out of 100
95.0%
Games Master UK
 
9/1/2007
94 out of 100
94.0%
 
9/25/2007
9 out of 10
90.0%
Edge Magazine UK
 
9/1/2007
9 out of 10
90.0%
gamesTM
 
9/1/2007
9 out of 10
90.0%
 
8/14/2007
9 out of 10
90.0%
Play Magazine
 
10/1/2007
8 out of 10
80.0%
 
8/30/2007
4 out of 5
80.

f we want to see how stupid this makes them look:

Sonic the Hedgehog industry average 4.3
Play Magazine review 9.0
Difference: +4.7

Lair industry average 5.8
Play Magazine review 10
Difference: +4.2

Heavenly Sword industry average 8.1
Play Magazine review 10
Difference: +1.1

Phantom Hourglass average score 9.1
Play Magazine review 8.0
Difference: -1.1

These guys are all over the place. I think the SDF has more accurate reviews than Play Magazine.


That doesn't seem like much in terms of out of 10, but when you think about it in terms of
+47%
+42%
+11%
-11%

it makes it much more evident that something weird is going on

I was actually under the impression that Play Magazine was a solely PS magazine until i saw that they had a score for PH on it



they gave sonic a 6.5 and lair got a 9.



"We'll toss the dice however they fall,
And snuggle the girls be they short or tall,
Then follow young Mat whenever he calls,
To dance with Jak o' the Shadows."

Check out MyAnimeList and my Game Collection. Owner of the 5 millionth post.