naznatips said: | | 7/4/2007 | 10 out of 10 | 100.0% | Game Informer | | 10/1/2007 | 9.5 out of 10 | 95.0% | NGamer UK | | 9/1/2007 | 95 out of 100 | 95.0% | Games Master UK | | 9/1/2007 | 94 out of 100 | 94.0% | | | 9/25/2007 | 9 out of 10 | 90.0% | Edge Magazine UK | | 9/1/2007 | 9 out of 10 | 90.0% | gamesTM | | 9/1/2007 | 9 out of 10 | 90.0% | | | 8/14/2007 | 9 out of 10 | 90.0% | Play Magazine | | 10/1/2007 | 8 out of 10 | 80.0% | | | 8/30/2007 | 4 out of 5 | 80. |
f we want to see how stupid this makes them look: Sonic the Hedgehog industry average 4.3 Play Magazine review 9.0 Difference: +4.7 Lair industry average 5.8 Play Magazine review 10 Difference: +4.2
Heavenly Sword industry average 8.1 Play Magazine review 10 Difference: +1.1
Phantom Hourglass average score 9.1 Play Magazine review 8.0 Difference: -1.1 These guys are all over the place. I think the SDF has more accurate reviews than Play Magazine. |
That doesn't seem like much in terms of out of 10, but when you think about it in terms of
+47%
+42%
+11%
-11%
it makes it much more evident that something weird is going on
I was actually under the impression that Play Magazine was a solely PS magazine until i saw that they had a score for PH on it