naznatips on 26 September 2007
7/4/2007 | 10 out of 10 | 100.0% | ||
 Game Informer | 10/1/2007 | 9.5 out of 10 | 95.0% | |
| NGamer UK | 9/1/2007 | 95 out of 100 | 95.0% | |
| Games Master UK | 9/1/2007 | 94 out of 100 | 94.0% | |
9/25/2007 | 9 out of 10 | 90.0% | ||
| Edge Magazine UK | 9/1/2007 | 9 out of 10 | 90.0% | |
| gamesTM | 9/1/2007 | 9 out of 10 | 90.0% | |
8/14/2007 | 9 out of 10 | 90.0% | ||
| Play Magazine | 10/1/2007 | 8 out of 10 | 80.0% | |
8/30/2007 | 4 out of 5 | 80.0% |
Play sure isn't doing anything for their credibility. What a ridiculous excuse for a magazine. They gave Sonic the Hedgehog a 9 then Lair a 10, Heavenly Sword a 10, and now Phantom Hourglass an 8.
If we want to see how stupid this makes them look:
Sonic the Hedgehog industry average 4.3
Play Magazine review 9.0
Difference: +4.7
Lair industry average 5.8
Play Magazine review 10
Difference: +4.2
Heavenly Sword industry average 8.1
Play Magazine review 10
Difference: +1.1
Phantom Hourglass average score 9.1
Play Magazine review 8.0
Difference: -1.1
These guys are all over the place. I think the SDF has more accurate reviews than Play Magazine.
