By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft - Halo 4 release date September 2010 - MS is set to attack 2010!!

wholikeswood on 31 May 2009
jesus kung fu magic said:
wholikeswood said:
jesus kung fu magic said:
wholikeswood said:
DjFlex53 said:
MS has a strong lineup for 2010.

It's bizarre that ps3 gamers can claim that Halo 3 didn't live up to its hype but, as a 2 year old game, it can outsell Killzone 2 (a 2 month old game) in the month of April 2009.

Also, if gamers are so disappointed in Halo 3, then why is it the #1 online game on the 360?

Something can be disappointing yet still sell extremely well, COD5 for example.

As for being #1 in Live activity, it has sold 10mil copies...

This makes absolutly no sense. If the game was overhyped , it would have dropped off the charts regardless of sales but no because its such a fantastic game it is still being played online enough to warrent no.1 on the charts.

 

Seriously if you actually believe that halo 3 is over-hyped , then you believe that the ps3 has no games because they are both 2007 arguments and both are at the same level of stupidity.

Not necessarily. It could be a critical disappointment but still sufficiently popular among the mainstream in order to sustain strong Live activity.

Halo was a critical disappointment now?

The  J man could just show you the meta but he is pretty sure you are aware of your fail.

As I said to seece, I was talking on principle and not commentating on Halo 3. Keep the "fail" stuff; I'm not interested.



Around the Network
richardhutnik on 31 May 2009

If Gears 3 is 2010, then the next Halo should drop 2011. I recall reading that Halo and Gears would flip-flop every year. Then again we got two Halo titles this year.



Squilliam on 31 May 2009
Leonidus said:
Squilliam said:
Leonidus said:
jesus kung fu magic said:
Zizzla_Rachet said:

Really now?...Overrated?

Gears of War - Metascore 94

Gears of War 2 -Metasocre 93

Mass Effect - Metascore 91

Halo 3 - metascore 94

Forget it man , ps3 fanboys cant seem to distinguish between opinion and fact.

@ Darendt

If you could play them , then im sure youd be loving them to.

The J man is a hypocrite. 

If you look at those silly metacritic figures, Gears of War has a higher score that Gears of War 2. According to all you 360 fans who take metacritic numbers as the law, It obviously and factually did not live up to its previous installment and therefore did not deliver.

So after claiming that all these games lived up to their hype, the 'facts' show otherwise.

 

 

All 'we' Xbox 360 fans don't share your wacky belief system. Heres an analogy for you.

A truck company delivers 5 boxes of win(e) in one delivery and four boxes of win(e) in the next.

A different truck company delivered 1 box of win(e) in one delivery and four boxes of win(e) in the next.

Which truck company delivered the most win(e)?

 

 

Yes, so Gears 1 delivered more win(e) than Gears 2, therefore Gears 2 didn't live up to it's hype that it recieved from its previous installment.

Also, I didn't tar all you 360 fans with the same brush like you are trying to make out. I clearly specified it to all the 360 fans 'who take metacritic numbers as the law'

Even for people who take metacritic as the law of the land it still doesn't make for a significant difference between Gears 1 and 2. Its not even statistically significant.



Tease.

jesus kung fu magic on 31 May 2009
Leonidus said:
jesus kung fu magic said:
Zizzla_Rachet said:
darendt said:
megaman.2. said:
Killzowned said:
Not interested in any of those games, so MS will need to do better to entice me into buying 360.

Halo4, Gears of War 3 and Mass effect 2+huge library of games, not enough to entice you to purchase a X360 WHATTT! clearly youre not a gamer!!

Huge library of what games. The three mentioned are overated, and the rest of there games I can get on PS3.

Really now?...Overrated?

Gears of War - Metascore 94

Gears of War 2 -Metasocre 93

Mass Effect - Metascore 91

Halo 3 - metascore 94

Forget it man , ps3 fanboys cant seem to distinguish between opinion and fact.

@ Darendt

If you could play them , then im sure youd be loving them to.

The J man is a hypocrite.

If you look at those silly metacritic figures, Gears of War has a higher score that Gears of War 2. According to all you 360 fans who take metacritic numbers as the law, It obviously and factually did not live up to its previous installment and therefore did not deliver.

So after claiming that all these games lived up to their hype, the 'facts' show otherwise.

 

 

WOW ,those are some serious straws your grasping there.

Anyways since when was it a given that the sequel MUST be equal to its previous installment to not be warrented a dissapointment(even if it is ONE freakin point!!!)?

If you were trying to discredit metacritics then you did a horrible job at it.

 



N64 is the ONLY console of the fifth generation!!!

Leonidus on 31 May 2009
Squilliam said:
Leonidus said:
Squilliam said:
Leonidus said:
jesus kung fu magic said:
Zizzla_Rachet said:

Really now?...Overrated?

Gears of War - Metascore 94

Gears of War 2 -Metasocre 93

Mass Effect - Metascore 91

Halo 3 - metascore 94

Forget it man , ps3 fanboys cant seem to distinguish between opinion and fact.

@ Darendt

If you could play them , then im sure youd be loving them to.

The J man is a hypocrite. 

If you look at those silly metacritic figures, Gears of War has a higher score that Gears of War 2. According to all you 360 fans who take metacritic numbers as the law, It obviously and factually did not live up to its previous installment and therefore did not deliver.

So after claiming that all these games lived up to their hype, the 'facts' show otherwise.

 

 

All 'we' Xbox 360 fans don't share your wacky belief system. Heres an analogy for you.

A truck company delivers 5 boxes of win(e) in one delivery and four boxes of win(e) in the next.

A different truck company delivered 1 box of win(e) in one delivery and four boxes of win(e) in the next.

Which truck company delivered the most win(e)?

 

 

Yes, so Gears 1 delivered more win(e) than Gears 2, therefore Gears 2 didn't live up to it's hype that it recieved from its previous installment.

Also, I didn't tar all you 360 fans with the same brush like you are trying to make out. I clearly specified it to all the 360 fans 'who take metacritic numbers as the law'

Even for people who take metacritic as the law of the land it still doesn't make for a significant difference between Gears 1 and 2. Its not even statistically significant.

I know, just like there is a insignificant gap between Halo 3 and Killzone 2.



Around the Network
Squilliam on 31 May 2009
Leonidus said:
Squilliam said:
Leonidus said:
Squilliam said:
Leonidus said:
jesus kung fu magic said:
Zizzla_Rachet said:

Really now?...Overrated?

Gears of War - Metascore 94

Gears of War 2 -Metasocre 93

Mass Effect - Metascore 91

Halo 3 - metascore 94

Forget it man , ps3 fanboys cant seem to distinguish between opinion and fact.

@ Darendt

If you could play them , then im sure youd be loving them to.

The J man is a hypocrite. 

If you look at those silly metacritic figures, Gears of War has a higher score that Gears of War 2. According to all you 360 fans who take metacritic numbers as the law, It obviously and factually did not live up to its previous installment and therefore did not deliver.

So after claiming that all these games lived up to their hype, the 'facts' show otherwise.

 

 

All 'we' Xbox 360 fans don't share your wacky belief system. Heres an analogy for you.

A truck company delivers 5 boxes of win(e) in one delivery and four boxes of win(e) in the next.

A different truck company delivered 1 box of win(e) in one delivery and four boxes of win(e) in the next.

Which truck company delivered the most win(e)?

 

 

Yes, so Gears 1 delivered more win(e) than Gears 2, therefore Gears 2 didn't live up to it's hype that it recieved from its previous installment.

Also, I didn't tar all you 360 fans with the same brush like you are trying to make out. I clearly specified it to all the 360 fans 'who take metacritic numbers as the law'

Even for people who take metacritic as the law of the land it still doesn't make for a significant difference between Gears 1 and 2. Its not even statistically significant.

I know, just like there is a insignificant gap between Halo 3 and Killzone 2.

Huh? Since when did Halo get dragged into all this?



Tease.

Leonidus on 31 May 2009
Squilliam said:
Leonidus said:
Squilliam said:
Leonidus said:
Squilliam said:
Leonidus said:
jesus kung fu magic said:
Zizzla_Rachet said:

Really now?...Overrated?

Gears of War - Metascore 94

Gears of War 2 -Metasocre 93

Mass Effect - Metascore 91

Halo 3 - metascore 94

Forget it man , ps3 fanboys cant seem to distinguish between opinion and fact.

@ Darendt

If you could play them , then im sure youd be loving them to.

The J man is a hypocrite. 

If you look at those silly metacritic figures, Gears of War has a higher score that Gears of War 2. According to all you 360 fans who take metacritic numbers as the law, It obviously and factually did not live up to its previous installment and therefore did not deliver.

So after claiming that all these games lived up to their hype, the 'facts' show otherwise.

 

 

All 'we' Xbox 360 fans don't share your wacky belief system. Heres an analogy for you.

A truck company delivers 5 boxes of win(e) in one delivery and four boxes of win(e) in the next.

A different truck company delivered 1 box of win(e) in one delivery and four boxes of win(e) in the next.

Which truck company delivered the most win(e)?

 

 

Yes, so Gears 1 delivered more win(e) than Gears 2, therefore Gears 2 didn't live up to it's hype that it recieved from its previous installment.

Also, I didn't tar all you 360 fans with the same brush like you are trying to make out. I clearly specified it to all the 360 fans 'who take metacritic numbers as the law'

Even for people who take metacritic as the law of the land it still doesn't make for a significant difference between Gears 1 and 2. Its not even statistically significant.

I know, just like there is a insignificant gap between Halo 3 and Killzone 2.

Huh? Since when did Halo get dragged into all this?

I dont know. Ive talked about so many games in this unwinnable argument that Im a little dizzy. Im sure its relevant though.....



Hisiru on 31 May 2009
Leonidus said:
Squilliam said:
Leonidus said:
jesus kung fu magic said:
Zizzla_Rachet said:

Really now?...Overrated?

Gears of War - Metascore 94

Gears of War 2 -Metasocre 93

Mass Effect - Metascore 91

Halo 3 - metascore 94

Forget it man , ps3 fanboys cant seem to distinguish between opinion and fact.

@ Darendt

If you could play them , then im sure youd be loving them to.

The J man is a hypocrite. 

If you look at those silly metacritic figures, Gears of War has a higher score that Gears of War 2. According to all you 360 fans who take metacritic numbers as the law, It obviously and factually did not live up to its previous installment and therefore did not deliver.

So after claiming that all these games lived up to their hype, the 'facts' show otherwise.

 

 

All 'we' Xbox 360 fans don't share your wacky belief system. Heres an analogy for you.

A truck company delivers 5 boxes of win(e) in one delivery and four boxes of win(e) in the next.

A different truck company delivered 1 box of win(e) in one delivery and four boxes of win(e) in the next.

Which truck company delivered the most win(e)?

 

 

Yes, so Gears 1 delivered more win(e) than Gears 2, therefore Gears 2 didn't live up to it's hype that it recieved from its previous installment.

Also, I didn't tar all you 360 fans with the same brush like you are trying to make out. I clearly specified it to all the 360 fans 'who take metacritic numbers as the law'

Metascore 93 for 94 is much different huh? You really need a better argument. And frankly, 93 is a great score.....



Zizzla_Rachet on 31 May 2009
Leonidus said:
Squilliam said:
Leonidus said:
jesus kung fu magic said:
Zizzla_Rachet said:

Really now?...Overrated?

Gears of War - Metascore 94

Gears of War 2 -Metasocre 93

Mass Effect - Metascore 91

Halo 3 - metascore 94

Forget it man , ps3 fanboys cant seem to distinguish between opinion and fact.

@ Darendt

If you could play them , then im sure youd be loving them to.

The J man is a hypocrite. 

If you look at those silly metacritic figures, Gears of War has a higher score that Gears of War 2. According to all you 360 fans who take metacritic numbers as the law, It obviously and factually did not live up to its previous installment and therefore did not deliver.

So after claiming that all these games lived up to their hype, the 'facts' show otherwise.

 

 

All 'we' Xbox 360 fans don't share your wacky belief system. Heres an analogy for you.

A truck company delivers 5 boxes of win(e) in one delivery and four boxes of win(e) in the next.

A different truck company delivered 1 box of win(e) in one delivery and four boxes of win(e) in the next.

Which truck company delivered the most win(e)?

 

 

Yes, so Gears 1 delivered more win(e) than Gears 2, therefore Gears 2 didn't live up to it's hype that it recieved from its previous installment.

Also, I didn't tar all you 360 fans with the same brush like you are trying to make out. I clearly specified it to all the 360 fans 'who take metacritic numbers as the law'

PS2 delivered more win(e) than the PS3

There for the PS3 delivers almost no win(e)....

This game is easy...but not very fun....



 



Leonidus on 31 May 2009
Zizzla_Rachet said:
Leonidus said:
Squilliam said:
Leonidus said:
jesus kung fu magic said:
Zizzla_Rachet said:

Really now?...Overrated?

Gears of War - Metascore 94

Gears of War 2 -Metasocre 93

Mass Effect - Metascore 91

Halo 3 - metascore 94

Forget it man , ps3 fanboys cant seem to distinguish between opinion and fact.

@ Darendt

If you could play them , then im sure youd be loving them to.

The J man is a hypocrite. 

If you look at those silly metacritic figures, Gears of War has a higher score that Gears of War 2. According to all you 360 fans who take metacritic numbers as the law, It obviously and factually did not live up to its previous installment and therefore did not deliver.

So after claiming that all these games lived up to their hype, the 'facts' show otherwise.

 

 

All 'we' Xbox 360 fans don't share your wacky belief system. Heres an analogy for you.

A truck company delivers 5 boxes of win(e) in one delivery and four boxes of win(e) in the next.

A different truck company delivered 1 box of win(e) in one delivery and four boxes of win(e) in the next.

Which truck company delivered the most win(e)?

 

 

Yes, so Gears 1 delivered more win(e) than Gears 2, therefore Gears 2 didn't live up to it's hype that it recieved from its previous installment.

Also, I didn't tar all you 360 fans with the same brush like you are trying to make out. I clearly specified it to all the 360 fans 'who take metacritic numbers as the law'

PS2 delivered more win(e) than the PS3

There for the PS3 delivers almost no win(e)....

This game is easy...but not very fun....

Metacritic dosen't review consoles.