Squilliam said:
Leonidus said:
Squilliam said:
Leonidus said:
Squilliam said:
Leonidus said:
jesus kung fu magic said:
Zizzla_Rachet said:
Really now?...Overrated?
Gears of War - Metascore 94
Gears of War 2 -Metasocre 93
Mass Effect - Metascore 91
Halo 3 - metascore 94
|
Forget it man , ps3 fanboys cant seem to distinguish between opinion and fact.
@ Darendt
If you could play them , then im sure youd be loving them to.
|
The J man is a hypocrite.
If you look at those silly metacritic figures, Gears of War has a higher score that Gears of War 2. According to all you 360 fans who take metacritic numbers as the law, It obviously and factually did not live up to its previous installment and therefore did not deliver.
So after claiming that all these games lived up to their hype, the 'facts' show otherwise.
|
All 'we' Xbox 360 fans don't share your wacky belief system. Heres an analogy for you.
A truck company delivers 5 boxes of win(e) in one delivery and four boxes of win(e) in the next.
A different truck company delivered 1 box of win(e) in one delivery and four boxes of win(e) in the next.
Which truck company delivered the most win(e)?
|
Yes, so Gears 1 delivered more win(e)  than Gears 2, therefore Gears 2 didn't live up to it's hype that it recieved from its previous installment.
Also, I didn't tar all you 360 fans with the same brush like you are trying to make out. I clearly specified it to all the 360 fans 'who take metacritic numbers as the law'
|
Even for people who take metacritic as the law of the land it still doesn't make for a significant difference between Gears 1 and 2. Its not even statistically significant.
|
I know, just like there is a insignificant gap between Halo 3 and Killzone 2.
|
Huh? Since when did Halo get dragged into all this?
|
I dont know. Ive talked about so many games in this unwinnable argument that Im a little dizzy. Im sure its relevant though.....
