Zlejedi said:
superchunk said:
This is why I like Obama. Not beating around the bush (no pun intended), he is clearly making the appropriate stands that even Israeli supporters can not really argue against. Settlements need to be 100% halted and removed if illegal outposts in order for peace to actually be negotiated. Israel cannot expect peace and negotiations while they keep stealing land, it just doesn't work.
I hope Obama comes back with more of a tone that links full adherence w/ US funding. :) Israel needs US a lot more than US needs Israel.
|
1. They are not stealing anything, free Palestine is artificial creation made by whoever digged up Arafat from his hiding hole. AFAIK this idea have been created long after Israel become country.
2. You are also wrong about US not needing Israel. Israel is huge buffor against all the terroristic movements from this area, and also great help to keep arabs in the region under control. If it weren't for them those bombs from Tel-Aviw would be exploading on streets of US and EU cities.
3. IMHO Obama is stupid if he belives situation there can be solved by peace talks when both sides don't want it.
4. Giving East Jerusalem to Palestinians would be disaster and would just create one huge battlefield.
5. The only long term solution would be coexistance of both nations in a single country considering how much of places there shares history for Jews and Arabs (and Christians for that matter too but at least they are not trying to bomb other sides to oblivion) but before that happens radical arab groups must be crushed.
|
1. What are you talking about here? Two points that my address what I think you mean.
A) prior to illegal Jewish migration to Palestine at the close of WWII Arabs (Muslim and Christian) were ~85% of the population. So the land was owned by Arabs. Since no money has been given to Arab land owners the settlement areas I would call it stealing.
B) During WWII the British made written promises to the arabs. Any nation that is majority Arab will go to full Arab control if they side with the British/French against the Turks. This happened everywhere except Palestine.
2. If it weren't for the massively biased support of Israel, there wouldn't be most of the terrorist groups and certainly wouldn't be anywhere near the animosity towards the US / EU as there is now. Israel is the cause.
3. Actually the majority of both sides do want it. Its just the minority of extremists that want it to continue. Israeli current leadership is unfortunately wanting this to continue as they have the currect advantage and know that they can keep slowly stealing the land if the status quo remains. However, Obama and Abbas both know that if US strongly supports a state Hamas and other groups will lose favor among the Palestinian population and peace is definitely possibile. Hell the entire Arab world has already signed a document for full peace if Palestine gets 1967 borders and right of return. This is just the initial offering. I'm sure if Abbas accepted a little less then the Arab leaders would be fine as well.
4. I can see your point here, but still doesn't make it right. E. Jerusalem was fine and peaceful before Israel and could be after as well. Just depends on how peace is obtained for the Palestinians.
5. I actually like that scenario as the Jews would eventually become the minority again. Thus, Israel would be an Arab controlled country. :) However, Israel would never want the land with millions of Arabs still on it. Settlement expansion was their goal. BTW, the Christians you are referring to, are Arab. In fact some of the various military groups of Palestinians have been Christian created and ran. Also, just as Hamas needs to be quieted, so does the radical settler movement.