Well the 360 has been on the market a year longer! where are the eqaully as good graphical games then?

................................."tumble weed"............ no where

Okay, you cant really do a tumble weed in your own post because i havent had a chance to answer (this is not real life remember).

There is a little thing called TECHNOLOGY, yah, it increases year by year, companies find new ways of doing things, Alan Wake looks freking good, MS (or assortered companies) are finally using the technology where as PS3 have been using it a lot.

Look at HALO 3, doesnt need a hell of a lot of graphics to sell almost 10 mill, Ms doesnt need graphics (lots of graphics) to sell games, Sony seems to think that is what they need, screw gameplay. Dont get me wrong there are some really fun games with awesome gameplay, LBP is one of the better examples, but there are some shit ones to.

I know this is the case for both consoles, but 360 ones aren't usually the ones that are hyped up, bar Too Human (that game was upsettingly bad)

The 360 will do just fine without MGS. However if they got exclusive rights to MGS5 that'll be a big hit for the PS3.

Alan wake? yeah I'm Looking forward to that on my PC Havn't seen any xbox footage of it yet though, and i Never said Graphics was everything, I enjoyed halo a lot and i know graphics didnt effect it, I said kojima was an ARTIST, and he is using the console he thinks is best to present Metal gear solid

Posting cuz I will be back..I wanna look at the MW2 new trailer thread first

You don't need millions of millions of dollars. You only need a skilled developer like for instance Naughty Dog. * Knock knock *

360 is a year older than the PS3 and consoles usually have better games the longer into their cycle they get. 360 has yet to show off a better looking game than any of PS3's top games. I'm not saying graphics is everything, and not saying PS3 is MILES better than the 360, but there are just things that can be done on the PS3 that cannot be done on the 360, and vice versa.

You 360 owners just have to live with that fact, and then we PS3 owners will do the same (with whatever you guys feel the 360 has an advantage in. LIVE does not count for me though as I'm not fan of online anyways). I manage fine without a 360, no games besides maybe Mass Effect interest me at all, and if I really want to play that game, I'll just play it at a friends house. But a 360 will never set foot in my house. All other consoles made by other companies are welcomed as I own all systems of this gen besides the 360.

For me, there is just so much more artwork, quality and excitement put into Sony's first party games and I can't really say I feel the same for MS. The games that sell good on the 360 are games which includes guns and violence...

And about Alan Wake: I really like that game, but based on the tech demo they showed, which were showing off what they could do with a processor with 4 cores, my 2 cents are that it will shine on PC (like every other game) and be BLEAK on the 360...

It's easy to say this when PS3 games are 2+ years in development......But you must also consider that no Xbox 360 games uses more than one of Xenon three cores...

Kojima also said that he was using the Cell to full capacity..Unless he's a total dumbass..What more can you expect from the next MGS game other than similar Graphics

Perhaps you want to tell what PS3 besides LBP does not have Guns or Violence

Also If Alan Wake is using four cores..Then the Xenon should do well with it's Three cores

These MGS threads are really getting old...

Let's just stick with some sort of MGS announcement is coming soon.

People on both sides of the fanboy fence are just setting themselves up for disappointment when the announcement finally comes...

There should be a ban on MGS threads until then...