akuseru said:
You don't need millions of millions of dollars. You only need a skilled developer like for instance Naughty Dog. * Knock knock * 360 is a year older than the PS3 and consoles usually have better games the longer into their cycle they get. 360 has yet to show off a better looking game than any of PS3's top games. I'm not saying graphics is everything, and not saying PS3 is MILES better than the 360, but there are just things that can be done on the PS3 that cannot be done on the 360, and vice versa. You 360 owners just have to live with that fact, and then we PS3 owners will do the same (with whatever you guys feel the 360 has an advantage in. LIVE does not count for me though as I'm not fan of online anyways). I manage fine without a 360, no games besides maybe Mass Effect interest me at all, and if I really want to play that game, I'll just play it at a friends house. But a 360 will never set foot in my house. All other consoles made by other companies are welcomed as I own all systems of this gen besides the 360. For me, there is just so much more artwork, quality and excitement put into Sony's first party games and I can't really say I feel the same for MS. The games that sell good on the 360 are games which includes guns and violence...
And about Alan Wake: I really like that game, but based on the tech demo they showed, which were showing off what they could do with a processor with 4 cores, my 2 cents are that it will shine on PC (like every other game) and be BLEAK on the 360... |
Perhaps you want to tell what PS3 besides LBP does not have Guns or Violence
Also If Alan Wake is using four cores..Then the Xenon should do well with it's Three cores
