| Rei said: I am waiting for EDGE review. |
I bet if EDGE gives a 6 we have another meltdown thread. Or imagine if they give it a 4 like they did witcher.



| Rei said: I am waiting for EDGE review. |
I bet if EDGE gives a 6 we have another meltdown thread. Or imagine if they give it a 4 like they did witcher.

epicurean said:
Niether of those reviews prove it (though I personally think they are both overrated, just my opinion). Though so far there have been about 8 other reviews all from 85-95, and they give it a 70. Definetley out of the norm. However, I'm guessing at least one other reviewer will give it a score along those lines, just because there will probably at least be one other person who thinks less of it than the "average" reviewer. All that being said, it seems (so far) pretty safe to assume that the majority of reviewers will find this an 85-95 game. |
In the end, it's all about opinions. Eurogamer were also the ones who gave Noby Noby Boy a 9/10, which is also pretty "out of the norm", so to speak. Noby Noby Boy currently has a metacritic score of 74.
| seece said: LOL at people saying "ooo harsh", you havn't even played the game yet how would you KNOW they're being harsh, and don't tell me "Oh but I have played the demo!!" sod the poxy demo you havn't played the full game so stop with the stupid insults towards Eurogamer. |
There are pleeenty of ppl with the full game already and besides a few technical issues here and there, the game is really good. I have yet to read somebody with the full game say that the game is mediocre, or average.
SnakeEyez said:
There are pleeenty of ppl with the full game already and besides a few technical issues here and there, the game is really good. I have yet to read somebody with the full game say that the game is mediocre, or average. |
I'll take a wild guess and say nobody here as played it, have you? and since when was a 7 medicore???
Acevil said:
I bet if EDGE gives a 6 we have another meltdown thread. Or imagine if they give it a 4 like they did witcher. |
wow, just wow and they call themselves professional? BS
@ libellule
Just because it is the same site does not (=) same reviewer. I have seen these type of numbers posted numerous times regarding games when people disagree with the ratings. "That site is complete bias, they gave (insert game here) a 10, they must be sucking MS/Sony's #$%&"
Halo 3 metacritic average is 94, GTA4 is 98.......so the average is closer in line with the 10's given. Do both games rate 10's.....no (IMO). Havnt played a game worth a 10 this gen yet (havnt bought MGS4 for my PS3 yet....so calm down Sony fans). I will post my PS3/game review once I have had more extensive playtime with the system and games. Halo 3 multiplayer is amazing but I would still rate the game between a 9.2-9.5 for me. I cant intelligently comment on GTA IV because I do not like the genre.
Sometimes games really do deserve the 7 and 8's they receive.
I still plan on getting Infamous for my PS3 so it is not a loss when reviews bring it down into the 80's. Some of my favorite games this Gen have high 70's-80's averages.....Halo Wars, Valkyria Chronicles, Lost Odyssey, ect.
| seece said: LOL at people saying "ooo harsh", you havn't even played the game yet how would you KNOW they're being harsh, and don't tell me "Oh but I have played the demo!!" sod the poxy demo you havn't played the full game so stop with the stupid insults towards Eurogamer. |
Well I did/ and still am playing the Demo, and come 26th of May, I will be playing the real game. When I Play the real game, and I formulate my absolute opinion on it, I assure you it will be nowhere near what Eurogamer put it. Thats just it. Eurogamer's reviews are not what people in general think of the game when they play it most of the time, which makes their reviews nonesense most of the time.
From just playing what I have in the demo alone this game could be nothing less than a 8.9, everything else is biased dribble.


![]()
PSN:Forevercloud (looking for Soul Sacrifice Partners!!!)
Not really surprise at this. As if, this will change my thoughts of buying it.
It's very sad when gamers rely too much on game reviews. Sometimes you need to do your own research and if there's a demo try it. Because you might have missed a game that you will truly enjoyed.



nojustno said:
wow, just wow and they call themselves professional? BS |
Actually I was a little wrong, they gave it a 5, but remember a 5 from edge means 7.5 from IGN. (but a lot of people don't know edge uses a different scale, so it is funny when a meltdown happens because of it.

forevercloud3000 said:
Well I did/ and still am playing the Demo, and come 26th of May, I will be playing the real game. When I Play the real game, and I formulate my absolute opinion on it, I assure you it will be nowhere near what Eurogamer put it. Thats just it. Eurogamer's reviews are not what people in general think of the game when they play it most of the time, which makes their reviews nonesense most of the time. From just playing what I have in the demo alone this game could be nothing less than a 8.9, everything else is biased dribble. |
I also thought the demo for Wolverine was really good, certainly the full game must be extremely good as well. Oh, wait...