By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Battlefield 1943 is coming out, the COD series better get ready for ownage.

mtlca66 on 18 May 2009

battlefield 2 shits on all cods. always has always will.




Get your Portable ID!

Around the Network
S.T.A.G.E. on 18 May 2009
rckrz6 said:
perpride said:
outlawauron said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
perpride said:

Warhawk already did what battlefield does but in third person....did that make it sell better?

Warhawk is a good game, but do not place it with games where it is terribly out of its league. Command & Conquer: Renegade was even better than Warhawk.

What now? Warhawk is way out of Battlefield's league. Warhawk is so much better.

 

I agree with the bolded. To me, Warhawk was what I always dreamt Battlefield 2 would be. The multiplayer aspect of 1942 and Desert Combat are what kept me coming back to Battlefield. Warhawk pretty much dominated that game in every way.

I totally disagree.  I though warhawk is not even anywhere as near good as even the first battlefield game

 

 

 

He changed what I wrote to make it sound like I liked Warhawk better than BF. Funny little guy.



S.T.A.G.E. on 18 May 2009
Akvod said:
I don't think BC and this game are going to be similar. I mean, destructable environments are a HUGE deal that really changes the gameplay in BC. You can't take solace in being in a windowed house. If you don't kill the guy instantly, or if you're attacking a group you're going to have to move soon before someone blows a hole in the wall/roof with a grenade launcher.

At the same time you could make a nest/camp spot anywhere, and you constantly want to take the high ground (but risk yourself at being mortared as well).

 

 

I think the only similarity this 1943 will have to BC is the new engine with the destructable environments. Everything else will go back to square one. Also the Japanese will be able to use swords in this game. In 1943, if you get bombed from the sky from enemy planes there will be nowhere to hide. That is far more realistic than in the past.



Garnett on 18 May 2009
S.T.A.G.E. said:

This is the only game I know that has a chance of destroying the COD series.

-Flying Planes, riding in tanks and Jeeps.

-Multiple map spawn points.

-A larger list of classes

-New physics, including the ability to knock down trees.

OMG I cannot wait! COD is so overrated!

Someone else thinks this is gonna be a CawD killer?! Good cause it is! CawD is so over rated.... BF43 baby!

 



*Remember when the world was supposed to end on May 21st, 2011? Well click here to see our short parody video of it [not]ending*

outlawauron on 18 May 2009
S.T.A.G.E. said:
rckrz6 said:
perpride said:
outlawauron said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
perpride said:

Warhawk already did what battlefield does but in third person....did that make it sell better?

Warhawk is a good game, but do not place it with games where it is terribly out of its league. Command & Conquer: Renegade was even better than Warhawk.

What now? Warhawk is way out of Battlefield's league. Warhawk is so much better.

I agree with the bolded. To me, Warhawk was what I always dreamt Battlefield 2 would be. The multiplayer aspect of 1942 and Desert Combat are what kept me coming back to Battlefield. Warhawk pretty much dominated that game in every way.

I totally disagree.  I though warhawk is not even anywhere as near good as even the first battlefield game

He changed what I wrote to make it sound like I liked Warhawk better than BF. Funny little guy.

Hey, I do what I can.



"We'll toss the dice however they fall,
And snuggle the girls be they short or tall,
Then follow young Mat whenever he calls,
To dance with Jak o' the Shadows."

Check out MyAnimeList and my Game Collection. Owner of the 5 millionth post.

Around the Network
Staude on 18 May 2009

The issue is EAs DRM system. I can't play battlefield 2142 because my dvd drive aparently is one of the ones that can't read the disc because of the insane copy protection.. So to play it I had to unplug my dvd drive, and plug in my other dvd drive (which I didn't normally use because of it's inability to do other things than read dvds, and there i could get it to read. To plug in that dvd drive i also had to unplug my other harddrive.. and those factors pretty much killed it for me.

And battlefield 1942 was killed when i bought a expansion pack that essentially had 3 maps.. >_> waste of money. (road to rome)



Check out my game about moles ^

Akvod on 18 May 2009
S.T.A.G.E. said:

This is the only game I know that has a chance of destroying the COD series.

-Flying Planes, riding in tanks and Jeeps.

-Multiple map spawn points.

-A larger list of classes

-New physics, including the ability to knock down trees.

OMG I cannot wait! COD is so overrated!

Isn't there only 3 classes? Knocking down trees was in BF: BC. There were Choppers, Tanks, and Jeeps in the BC. Yes, Planes are cool, but I don't really know how they're gonna do in such a small map (24 players). Multiple spawn points were always in BF.

I understand you're saying that COD doesn't have these features, but then why did BF: BC fail when it's at a higher bar than 1943? Clearly 1943 is setting the bar lower (for accesibility, low price point, easier and simpler).

I'm sorry, if you're a console BF fan then you should be looking at BC 2 or MAG.



deathgod33 on 18 May 2009

it could be a nice game, but it would take a lot to take on COD



 

 

 

 

S.T.A.G.E. on 18 May 2009
Akvod said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:

This is the only game I know that has a chance of destroying the COD series.

-Flying Planes, riding in tanks and Jeeps.

-Multiple map spawn points.

-A larger list of classes

-New physics, including the ability to knock down trees.

OMG I cannot wait! COD is so overrated!

Isn't there only 3 classes? Knocking down trees was in BF: BC. There were Choppers, Tanks, and Jeeps in the BC. Yes, Planes are cool, but I don't really know how they're gonna do in such a small map (24 players). Multiple spawn points were always in BF.

I understand you're saying that COD doesn't have these features, but then why did BF: BC fail when it's at a higher bar than 1943? Clearly 1943 is setting the bar lower (for accesibility, low price point, easier and simpler).

I'm sorry, if you're a console BF fan then you should be looking at BC 2 or MAG.

-Yeah, theres only three classes...I just checked (Sucks).

-The fighter jets will be in the game just like last the last BF1942.

-There has to be 24 players because of console bandwidth limits. Most clan wars on Battlfield were 12 vs 12 anyway.

-The maps will be large enough for fighter jets to roam and bomb.

BF: BC did not set the bar higher than BF: 1942, Desert Combat nor 2. That was actually the worst game in the series. Mag will be nowhere near the splendor that was battlfield 1942. I was a PC BF fan, but I am playing with consoles now, more than ever. I don't have the time to be investing into PC gaming any longer.

 



S.T.A.G.E. on 18 May 2009
BxN said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
BxN said:
This thread is delusional.

I'd be interested in a Battlefield 1942 for my PS3, but the simple thought of this game ''owning'' COD is just plain ridiculous.

 

 

Name something the COD series does that Battlefield 1942 or Desert Combat didn't already set the standard for. Delusional my ass. You seem to be forgetful that I am not speaking if Bad Company.

 

No matter what new features and innovation this game will offer, it won't have 1/4 of Call of Duty's user base and sales. I can't call that an ''ownage''. It's like saying Killzone 2 owned Halo 3 because it has better graphics and features. And yes I am aware that 1942 and Bad Company are nothing alike.

 

edit:

Let's also not forget how the almost all COD games have been more critically and commercially acclaimed than any Battlefield 1942 game.

I've been agreeing with with you the whole time about the userbase and the sales. COD is already a major name in war-time shooters. I'm not comparing BF1943 to COD in the same light as KZ2 having better graphics than Halo 3. That is not what matters to me. It's the gameplay thats always mattered to me and BF WWII games always delivered. COD has sold over 4 million, of course it would be more commercially acclaimed.