By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - MAG screenshots - So ugly my eyes burn, oh they burn!

nightsurge on 29 April 2009

@haxxiy
Try viewing the full image, not the small thumnails. At least those 360 games have AA and smooth edges, this game is jaggy heaven!

(view my post above yours for full image size)



Around the Network
forevercloud3000 on 29 April 2009
nightsurge said:
forevercloud3000 said:
@CGI

ditto dude. I dont see whats so terrible. I am pretty sure this is a joke thread. The graphics are higher then COD4&5's but lower then Killzone 2. That is good enough in my book.

The thing that will turn me off most is if this game is purely online like Warhawk. I hate that. If I spend 60 bucks on a game it better have a standalone play mode that I can play without the NEED of others.

Oh, and here is to hoping they put 3rd person perspective in it. I hate FP view, I only tolerate it in games.

The graphics are much worse than CoD4/5.  You got the small images.  Open the actual 720p images from the article and you will see the awful graphics.

 

correction, I would say they are more about equal. :)



      

      

      

Greatness Awaits

PSN:Forevercloud (looking for Soul Sacrifice Partners!!!)

leo-j on 29 April 2009

im going to end this pathetic argument:

http://vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=70528



 

mM
CrashMan on 29 April 2009

Can someone explain to me why people who want to show how great a FPS' graphics are regularly show screen shots from a 3rd person perspective?



I am a Gauntlet Adventurer.

I strive to improve my living conditions by hoarding gold, food, and sometimes keys and potions. I love adventure, fighting, and particularly winning - especially when there's a prize at stake. I occasionally get lost inside buildings and can't find the exit. I need food badly. What Video Game Character Are You?

Mega Man 9 Challenges: 74%

Waltz Tango Jitterbug Bust a move Headbanging
Bunny Hop Mr. Trigger Happy Double Trouble Mr. Perfect Invincible
Almost Invincible No Coffee Break Air Shoes Mega Diet Encore
Peacekeeper Conservationist Farewell To Arms Gamer's Day Daily Dose
Whomp Wiley! Truly Addicted! Truly Hardcore! Conqueror Vanquisher
Destroyer World Warrior Trusty Sidearm Pack Rat Valued Customer
Shop A Holic Last Man Standing Survivor Hard Rock Heavy Metal
Speed Metal Fantastic 9 Fully Unloaded Blue Bomber Eco Fighter
Marathon Fight Quick Draw G Quick Draw C Quick Draw S Quick Draw H
Quick Draw J Quick Draw P Quick Draw T Quick Draw M Quick Draw X
nojustno on 29 April 2009
CGI-Quality said:
nojustno said:
CGI-Quality said:
nojustno said:
CGI-Quality said:
@ nojustno
Show me a better looking 256-player console game....

Then come back and talk about what PS3 devs can do in 2009.

yeah, um I don't really care, I'm just expressing my opnion here :)

lol @ people that defend any exclusive game no matter the quality.

Expressing your opinion is one thing. Coming in and trolling the game is entirely different. Just know, you weren't called out for your opinion.

@ Squilliam

All you did was prove that this game HAS no competition in what it's trying to accomplish. It's in a league of it's own, which is the point.

 

For someone with over 5000 posts I expected you to know how forums work. guess not

And trolling is illogical reasoning, not expressing opinions even though they're negative. You're just in denial and for some reason feel the need to defend this game.

 

I know how the forums work, perhaps your just running out of excuses to defend yourself.

Regardless, what am I in denial about, the game is housing 256 players and you act like it should MILES better considering all that is happening. Then you call the devs lazy?

 

 I hope you recognize the Irony in that statement. And yes lazy. If it had average graphics it would've been ok in my book. This just looks last gen in HD.

 




Around the Network
DingoEgret on 29 April 2009

wow halo 3 has so much jaggies in that screenshot
i dont know why people are complaining about M.A.G



Use power for the right things. At least for the things that you believe in.

Skeeuk on 29 April 2009

game is out this fall plenty of time to polish visuals, im still willing to have a bet with some1 that mag wen relased will have better visuals online than halo 3 online



...not much time to post anymore, used to be awesome on here really good fond memories from VGchartz...

PSN: Skeeuk - XBL: SkeeUK - PC: Skeeuk

really miss the VGCHARTZ of 2008 - 2013...

Aldro on 29 April 2009

Yeah equal graphics to CoD 4, CoD 4 is still playable.. right? Then no big problem X) Lets just pray for the FPS/Lag and payment :o



nightsurge on 29 April 2009
forevercloud3000 said:
nightsurge said:
forevercloud3000 said:
@CGI

ditto dude. I dont see whats so terrible. I am pretty sure this is a joke thread. The graphics are higher then COD4&5's but lower then Killzone 2. That is good enough in my book.

The thing that will turn me off most is if this game is purely online like Warhawk. I hate that. If I spend 60 bucks on a game it better have a standalone play mode that I can play without the NEED of others.

Oh, and here is to hoping they put 3rd person perspective in it. I hate FP view, I only tolerate it in games.

The graphics are much worse than CoD4/5.  You got the small images.  Open the actual 720p images from the article and you will see the awful graphics.

 

correction, I would say they are more about equal. :)

CoD4/5 still look better.  Compare the full 720p shots.  MAG is full of bad textures and jaggy edges.  Granted it still may have like a year to polish graphics before it is released, so by the end of that it could be better than CoD4/5, but I bet CoDMW2 is better!

 



d21lewis on 29 April 2009

It looks pretty hot to me. People are so spoiled, nowadays.