My eyes, the goggles do nothing.

Please just read the hands-on eurogamer had on this.

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/mag-hands-on

Then someone will make the hyped thread

"OMFG-MAG!!!!!! hands-on" - I even made the thread title

Here are some quotes from the article:

"MAG is fun. In fact, it's massive fun. It's fast and loose, free-flowing, improvisational, spectacular, structured without being too rigid; it accommodates lone wolves, team players and power-trippers alike, and makes it easy for players themselves to direct the action. You'd expect it to be intimidating, but it actually feels like the FPS for everybody. Even after just one 20-minute, 128-player match, it's hard to shake the feeling that, one day, all multiplayer shooters will be made in its image."

"MAG's scale is all about people, not space. It's about seeing dozens of players by your side, dozens more in the distance, and hearing the widespread rattle of gunfire and the distant (or not-so-distant) screen-shaking thunder of airstrikes. Above all, it's about knowing that not one piece of this staggering spectacle, on a par with the grandest Call of Duty set-piece, is scripted or AI-directed. Every bullet, every explosion, every scrambling figure is the action of a real live player."

"environments are drawn in remarkable detail, considering the immense technical demands of running a 256-player battler at a solid 30 frames per second. MAG isn't quite Call of Duty 4 or Killzone 2 in the beauty-pageant stakes, and it has an understated look. But it's sharp, the level of detail is convincing, and abundant use of light-scattering fog and smoke engenders an impressively gritty, war-zone feel. Zipper's coding achievement is quietly immense."

Read the article if you are interested about the game. Then again feel free to continue bitching about it.

I am totally in hype mode for this

Man, you guys are jaded. I think the game looks fantastic.

I was thinking "what the hell is he talking about?", until I saw the 720p image.

That is actually disgusting. Resistance: Fall of Man looked better than THAT!

Wow... I don't know but... That seemed close to a Halo 3. Halo 3 wasn't bad looking nor was it spectacular....

Well I'm not saying it's a KZ2 or Uncharted or MGS4 in terms of graphics but, it's not horrid like Mobile Suit Gundam: Crossfire....

http://www.gametrailers.com/player/15844.html

Call me defending but I'm not expecting anything from this game. Just that I thought this was overreacting a bit.

I am a JRPG gamer for the most part.

8 vs 8 is more my style.

The graphics look great in the new trailor, and for the size of the map and amount of players it's decent graphics. And there is no way this is psp or ps2 graphics. Come on stop exaggerating guys. But anyway it all comes down to gameplay, and it looks like a cross with cod4 and bad company with a lot more players and better maps

Socom says hi...

I dont even own a PS3 but people calling graphics on this poor are fools.