At the expense of derailing the thread, when I clicked on the for half a second I expected to see some cheesy porn with a guy in super hero costume and a girl in skimpy clothes. Anyone else?

So I'll need to put imo after every sentence I write? I thought it was clear that it was my opinion that it is good morals.

Then again someone could think having a good moral is to kill useless people... But that's not what the majority of people would think.

And morals, weither I or someone else likes it or not, are based on religions, laws and common sense... So a general understanding of those should indicate that sleeping around with many people (regardless of gender) wouldn't be considered to be a good moral by most people.

However, I do know what you mean and I was only speaking for myself. So playing devil's advocate wasn't exactly necessary in this case.

You've both got it wrong.  You've got to use the bowie method.  Mind over orgasm.  Works for hours.

Plus you don't have to think about horrible things in the middle of it.

Well technically, sleeping around and knocking up as many women as possible is quite beneficiary to the human race, since there will be a lot more little babies running around thus greater the chance of the human race cotinuing! Plus my genes are better than the one the guy next door has anyhow!

Then you have the Aztecs which murdered and sacrificed people all over, and they were doing quite fine, they just didn't have any immunity to diseases the way Europeans did, and their morals served them perfectly well until that small hitch.

Hahahaha.  I was using a guesstimate for an average.  Some guys last 5 seconds, some guys last 5 hours, so I just guessed that 5 minutes would be a reasonable average.

Some women's magazines say that sex follows a 3-2-1 formula, 3 minutes of foreplay, 2 minutes of intercourse, and 1 minute of orgasm.  I don't know how they come up with these numbers.  2 minutes?

I'm not gonna get into details of my own sexcraft, but I'll just say that I balance speed, power, style, and innovation for a well-rounded bonetacular experience with my wife.

And if I get too excited, I uh... have an orgasm.  And keep going.  I don't see why orgasms should STOP sex.  They should be like, the end of Act 1, and then you build up, and end Act 2 with an even crazier climax, and then you find out Vader's been your father all along, and BLAM, super climax.  I call it the Shakespearean Plot Triangle Method.

Wait a minute, you're my father and Darth vaders my father???

STOP LYING TO ME RUBANGB!!!!

WAAAA

I'm curious, who forces them to do this?

Personally, I think it's basic instinct, it's the mating hunt that makes the guys cool and the girl sluts.
The way I see it, as long as it isn't rape, girls always have the final say on sex.
For the guys women are the mountain, and they aim to climb it, partly I blame the testosterone. So the guys thump their chests and flex their pecks to get the girls approval, exactly the same way some animals try to show off with their little dances and nests to get the female's approval.
By doing so, the female only gets to mate with guys she deems worthy.
Hence if a guy gets laid 7 days with different girls a week, then a lot of women approve of his masculinity.
If a girl gets plowed by different guys 7 days a week, then she's cheap and easy and would allow any male to mate with her.

Problem is, the thrill of the hunt is mostly gone. Women approve men to have sex with them far too easily nowadays.

Anyway, it's changing now and that "cool guy- slut girl" way of thinking is starting to fade. In my circle of friends they refer to guys who are like that as "dogs" that would hump anything(only female friends). Which seems fitting considering they use the term bitch for the girls who sleep around.

I don't know... I don't want to have a GF/Wife based completely off of sex... but when I want to have sex, I want to have it with someone hot.

I hope I don't sound really cynical, but I don't think "true love" exists, which is romantic love completely independent of sex. Why do we only "fall in love" with people within our sexual orientation (is that worded right?)? Het. Men will only go for women. Vice Versa. Gay men will only go for men, and gay women will only for women.

You could point at old couples, and how most couples don't even have sex anymore, but I (without any scientific knowledge or proof) believe that it's more based on obligation, and at those stages, the love isn't the traditional "romantic love", but almost like the love you have for friends and families. You love someone only because they're familiar to you.

hahahhahaha, Darth Vader is EVERYONE'S father. It's like a cultural crisis we all had to live through together.

I'm just talking about standard 5 act or 3 act plot formula, you've got twists and turns and several climaxes, instead of just 1.

Really, you shouldn't be focusing on gross things during sex to slow down. I'd rather focus on... the sex.

True love does exist... My personal description of true love is someone you always want to be with and you wouldn't desire anyone else, weither romantically or sexually. And why wouldn't true love include sex? It's not only a fun thing but also a way to express the love, romance and passion you have for the other.