Ooo. I might have to check that out.  I wish there was a demo for it...

No, I want to be liked lol, come on I am just excited after seeing that video, I see the potential now for the iphone to be a serious gamers machine.

Say hello to ipod touch, that is not a phone, if I do decide to buy one it will most likely be the ipod touch, I may wait as well because I heard new ones are coming out and 20 dollar games will be hitting the store, these games will be bigger and better than the ones out now.

hmm didnt some1 say this thing is more powerful than the dreamcast.. although the graphics say otherwise.. I just think having a complete touch interface limits the experience gamers can have.

its true the touch interface can limit the traditional gaming experience but the touch screen and/or accelerometer can make for some different awesome experiences.

If anybody has played Rolando I think they would understand what you mean. That is a game that would only work on the Wii or iPhone.  But yes I think a combination of buttons and touchscreen would be ideal. Though it would almost certainly bulk up the size of the device.

Oh, this isn't iPhone hate. I have high doubts of it being a serious gaming platform, though. There are a great many games that won't appear on the iPhone simply because of the lack of buttons and dual inputs for movement/looking. That's at least what I was saying. The OP made it sound like he was guillable enough to believe that such games can make it to the iPhone.

Did you even look at the link in my OP?

...ok. It's people like you that make me get banned, lol.

Do you know what a question mark indicates at the end of a sentence?

It means I asked a question. I wasn't trying to prove a point. I was asking a question. Sure, it was ill-informed, but I claim no knowledge on the subject. I don't own an iPhone, because it is, imo, vastly overpriced with far less features than my Blackberry. You might think my question was misleading, or ignorant, but it wasn't a "statement" it was a question.

You could have answered it fairly and informed me of my mistake. Instead you flamed me. Nice move.

My original assertion was an opinion. I clearly labeled it. I believe Apple stuff is overpriced.(imho means "In My Humble Opinion")

As for the walkman, you get better sound quality(an opinion shared by every reviewer that I've read, but still an opinion) for a much cheaper pricetag.

I think your motivation was anger over an uninformed question about a product that you enjoy, and that's fine, but don't speak to me anymore. Stop flaming people for asking questions and giving their opinions. I asked because I didn't know. You could have told me the right answer to that. You didn't. You flamed my question, and me. Thank you.

As for my advice, I think people should take it. Compare an iPhone or an iPod or a Mac to another product of equal price without the logo and see how the specs stack up.

Actually the question was if they "still" required you to re-buy things. That means that you were saying that at some point they did this in the past. That is incorrect. You were not asking if they ever did it, just if they continue to. Perhaps you misformulated the question- but that is hardly my fault now is it? You should have asked "Does Apple require you to re-buy music?". Sorry if I came down too hard on you, but what you are saying now is not what you typed. Now either your backpeddling because I called you on it, or you made an honest mistake.