| scottie said: Ok, a few things about that video you posted. The video shown, is of a the game projected onto a big screen, then recorded with a video camera from a tripod... The video of Time Crisis is not. It is taken directly from the output of the console. Second of all, I don't see how you think this comparison is going to favour you. The MG:touch game shows a highly detailed, highly realistic scene. Time Crisis on the other hand is more of an arcade style Thirdly, MG:touch looks much better. Look at the textures in TC, horrible. Characters are blocky and also have bad textures. MG:touch >>> TC |
wow you must really know nothing of the games because it's so painfully obvious that the time crysis game is many many times more advanced then the mgs touch one and yet you keep refusing it. Do you have one ? is that why it's painful to accept it's inferiority as a gaming device ? (atleast in the case of this game)
News flash. Metal gear touch don't have models. It's pictures. Yes, like a photoalbum but with gifs.
Let me show you and cut completely down to basics so perhaps i might make you realise this. On the other hand concidering you've refused it until now, i'm not sure theres much to do about it actually. If you believe something so hardheaded I don't have the time to convince you. But heres for one last shot.
Here i made this to display the differences in tech:

(right click, view)
If you still want to argue this point after that, i'm frankly not sure what to say. Because i have tried explaining this too you to the best that i can be arsed to do. Frankly if you aren't convinced after this I don't care. Whatever man. Suit yourself. You can live in a dreamworld if you want to.









