By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - MAG is not an iteration of SOCOM.

Yall totally missed the point which isn't surprising. It's almost the exact same kind of experience except its got a larger multiplayer aspect. It is being created by the same developers. When you can name it the same property given those scenarios, WHY WOULDN'T YOU. People area always complaining new IPs don't stand a chance so why take the risk when you don't have to. It makes no sense.



Around the Network
Zucas said:
Yall totally missed the point which isn't surprising. It's almost the exact same kind of experience except its got a larger multiplayer aspect. It is being created by the same developers. When you can name it the same property given those scenarios, WHY WOULDN'T YOU. People area always complaining new IPs don't stand a chance so why take the risk when you don't have to. It makes no sense.

 

but the thing is we don't know enough about the game to judge it yet.

 

it could be a TPS or an FPS we don't know really

 

until we see a gameplay trailer I think we should put the "MAG is SOCOM with 256 player online" on hold



why the socom hate game has been patched and plays fine now...........mag is sounding to be an awsome game new ip's are risky but they have to start somewhere, mag is deffo on my radar



...not much time to post anymore, used to be awesome on here really good fond memories from VGchartz...

PSN: Skeeuk - XBL: SkeeUK - PC: Skeeuk

really miss the VGCHARTZ of 2008 - 2013...

As long as Zipper's making it then i'll be happy. Socom 1 and 2 were awesome.



4 ≈ One

Skeeuk said:
why the socom hate game has been patched and plays fine now...........mag is sounding to be an awsome game new ip's are risky but they have to start somewhere, mag is deffo on my radar

 

i know that i'll get flamed by random generated level 284 flamers , but i love Socom Confrontation. its addicting.



Around the Network
Zucas said:
Yall totally missed the point which isn't surprising. It's almost the exact same kind of experience except its got a larger multiplayer aspect. It is being created by the same developers. When you can name it the same property given those scenarios, WHY WOULDN'T YOU. People area always complaining new IPs don't stand a chance so why take the risk when you don't have to. It makes no sense.

 

The number of people in the same game alone will drastically change the game from any socom.

As mentioned before,there hasn't been any info indicating that M.A.G. will be similar to Socom. So maybe the new IP was a good idea. 



Zucas said:
Yall totally missed the point which isn't surprising. It's almost the exact same kind of experience except its got a larger multiplayer aspect. It is being created by the same developers. When you can name it the same property given those scenarios, WHY WOULDN'T YOU. People area always complaining new IPs don't stand a chance so why take the risk when you don't have to. It makes no sense.

But this isn't anything like Socom. That would be like Square naming each and every game Finla Fantasy for the brand name even if it has nothing to do with the series.



"We'll toss the dice however they fall,
And snuggle the girls be they short or tall,
Then follow young Mat whenever he calls,
To dance with Jak o' the Shadows."

Check out MyAnimeList and my Game Collection. Owner of the 5 millionth post.