Euphoria14 said:
@ dhummel
I would suggest that before you try and quote me and use me in your ridiculous argument you should take the time to also realize that I used what Konami said about MGS4.
They said MGS4 would have to sell 1M first day (I was wrong about week) to begin making "profit", key word there.
Now from what we know here MGS4 cost upwards of 60-70M to develop. Killzone 2 is being speculated to cost around 50-60M, so if it already has 1M sales shouldn't it be on it's way to profitability?
Unlike Starcraft I used something to support my argument instead of insisting my opinion = fact. He also said "It is evident this game will not make money" without anything to support his argument besides rumors. Meaning it is NOT "evident".
I brought up something arguable that we can work from. So thanks a lot for pointing me out without reading the rest of my posts in this thread.
And where do you point out their lack of facts?
I love this quote too. You say for him to point it out but I did give something much more credible than Starcraft. I don't fit into your argument here.
Your whole post there fell flat on it's face the moment you quoted me.
Good day sir.
Edit - It was actually "1 million on it's first day to recoup development costs". So pretty much same thing.
|
I love your edit. Same thing, sure. And where are your facts again? "Something much more credible" that you can't quite bring youself to call a fact, because, well, you have no idea how many copies of MGS4 were sold before it was profitable? Nice fact. I love being the center of attention guys, bring it on. I like how this little cabal of posters, much like starcraft who trolls every KZ2 thread, follows him around and makes sure to jump on the dissenting point of view, pointing out "facts" like inferred guesstimates and hiding behind "I can't respond to every post." Yeah, well, you responded negatively ONLY to one post, and one you happened to disagree with but had no less arguable material than the guys I quoted.
