dallas said: starcraft said:
dallas said: They could theoretically buy SE just fine. But, why would Microsoft want to commit much greater resourcs than normal on a platform that has been thus far producing horrible financial results? That just doesn't make sense, b/c it is bad financial management. If microsoft actually bought SE it wouldn't have the money that it needs for Windows, dividends, its other ventures, HD-DVD and the 360. Buying SE would handicap Microsoft and it makes little point anyway from a strategic perspective, b/c SE is mostly a company that makes RPGs which means that its products will be big in Japan....but the Japanese don't like the 360. So unless Microsoft is planning on a *huge* price drop in japan as well as this purchase I don't see the point, and even then, that would probably not put them over or even close to nintendo so it would in the end accelerate their losses.
|
Last financial year Microsoft's revenue breached $50 billion. Its market capitalisation is $261 billion and its profit last year alone was $12 billion. Microsoft could purchase SE which is worth $3.3 billion and not even bat an eyelid. It could then go on to purchase Sony, Nintendo and the country New Zealand and still have enought left over for ice-cream and an executives weekend retreat. (ok maybe that last sentence was an exaggeration but Microsoft could purchase SE in its entirety and not experience handicapping of any kind). |
1. When acquisitions happen, it is usually a fact of business that a substantial premium has to be paid on the company being purchased, meaning that if the information that you provided me is correct that SE is in fact worth 3.3billion, then Microsoft might have to pay $6 billion for the purchase. 2. Secondly, you do realize that Microsoft has to allocate its earnings among various other things correct? You completely ignored this point. Do you have any idea of the expenses that microsoft needs just to keep the Windows division operating? Do you have any idea of the capital needs to keep HD-DVD afloat? A company can't just decide to throw away its big moneymaker (windows) and just concentrate on the losing division( 360) and expect for this division to do well by merely making an acquisition. |
Perhaps you didnt understand me. Microsofts PROFIT, was $12 billion. That means that when all was said and done, all expenses had been paid, Microsoft still pulled in a massive profit, EVEN taking into account a billion dollar loss for the xbox warranty.
It is true that a premium is often neccessary to purchase a company. This premium is NEVER even CLOSE to the massive two fold discrepency you just suggested. My country's national airline was almost sold at a price 10% above its share price, and it was a HUGE company compared to SE. In any case, as i have repeatedely said, Microsoft wouldnt need to buy anywhere near the whole $3.3 billion company. 15-25% of it would give them sufficient board room voting rights to get 360 ports for all major games
Edit: OH, and MS has little to do with funding HD DVD, and Windows is one of the biggest cashcows in capitalisms history. At this current point in time microsoft has just completed a windows platform (vista) that will probably be around for 6 years. This is the part of their business cycle where they will begin to see less expenses and greater returns