dallas said:
1. When acquisitions happen, it is usually a fact of business that a substantial premium has to be paid on the company being purchased, meaning that if the information that you provided me is correct that SE is in fact worth 3.3billion, then Microsoft might have to pay $6 billion for the purchase. 2. Secondly, you do realize that Microsoft has to allocate its earnings among various other things correct? You completely ignored this point. Do you have any idea of the expenses that microsoft needs just to keep the Windows division operating? Do you have any idea of the capital needs to keep HD-DVD afloat? A company can't just decide to throw away its big moneymaker (windows) and just concentrate on the losing division( 360) and expect for this division to do well by merely making an acquisition.
|
Perhaps you didnt understand me. Microsofts PROFIT, was $12 billion. That means that when all was said and done, all expenses had been paid, Microsoft still pulled in a massive profit, EVEN taking into account a billion dollar loss for the xbox warranty.
It is true that a premium is often neccessary to purchase a company. This premium is NEVER even CLOSE to the massive two fold discrepency you just suggested. My country's national airline was almost sold at a price 10% above its share price, and it was a HUGE company compared to SE. In any case, as i have repeatedely said, Microsoft wouldnt need to buy anywhere near the whole $3.3 billion company. 15-25% of it would give them sufficient board room voting rights to get 360 ports for all major games
Edit: OH, and MS has little to do with funding HD DVD, and Windows is one of the biggest cashcows in capitalisms history. At this current point in time microsoft has just completed a windows platform (vista) that will probably be around for 6 years. This is the part of their business cycle where they will begin to see less expenses and greater returns
starcraft - Playing Games = FUN, Talking about Games = SERIOUS







