^ No Starcraft. IMO PS3 owners get more quality games. Id take a 3.5M Killzone 2 over an 8M Halo 3. I'd take a 2M Uncharted over a 6M Gears of War.

Get my point?

Pwned.... Or something like that anyway.

I find it amazing that people who decided objectively to purchase a PS3 like PS3 games more.

Oh he is assuming i'm going to be selective like he is ? oooh very well. I decide that it's only xbox (the first) top 10 versus ps2's top 10. I can do that right ? you know, since aparently we can just be selective and not mention it ?

See, obviously he didn't say ps3, he didn't let people assume it was ps3, ofcourse that is what he meant. Yes, but he didn't state it. That means that he was wrong and frankly the whole way his op is structured reaks of a weak attempt at trolling the ps3 fan base.

The fact of the matter remains, He wrote that microsofts top 10 published games (un specified) were a certain number and that sonys top 10 published games were another certain number. You can be damn sure he hadn't made this thread if it had been the other way around, and i'm pretty sure that without you trolling he would have been pretty clueless about what his response should be because i'm obviously right.

Sonys top 5 > Microsofts top 10. It's as simple as that. Served.

@startcraft

Clearly your assumption that people won't notice your threads are created on the whole purpose of stealth trolling is also wrong.

It's not that I don't get your point, more that your point is wrong.

First of all, no, that's not that contention.  The contention is IF you are referring to Sony's dominant publishing (as you did to start this thread), what you must be referring to is the quality of Sony's 1st party games.  By suggesting that people wrongly trump the SALES of Sony PS3 games, you are wrong, because that's not what people have ever referred to as Sony's dominant publishing.

But now (beaten by the truth of the quality of first party games) you try to switch the discussion to overall high-quality games.  But that's a different topic, and if you move to it, you give up on the first one.

Sony gamers get "few" good games?  Hah...more than I can play, anyway.  Anyway there went The Last Remnant of your credibility.

Also, Leonidas was correct because he's saying that Sony games are of high quality and that we've never claimed that sales were the reason Sony was "dominate" as you put it.  And he's right.  I think you still quite miss the point.

@Squilliam: good timing on your 'pwned' response.  I agree.

Oh Dear..... So you didn't get my point then Starcraft.
Anyway, Congratulations on failing to bash Sony and getting more people to dislike you, cause thats all you've really got out of this thread.

^ Learn Something Every Day :p

GT wont change a thing. MS is publishing two more titles from Rare that are huge this year and will be revealed at E3. Are you crazy? Sony has met their match as far as publishing is concerned.

second thread in the last 24hrs starcraft made its sad for works.

its looks like he is trying to damage control sony recent surge of AAA titles,


since MGS4--> LBP--> Killzone 2 they haven't stopped and hell God of war 3, GT5, Trico are comming PURE QUALITY ! :D.