| starcraft said:
To all those claiming that Sony has better first party development. Is it your submission that Microsoft gamers receive more, high-quality titles than Sony gamers, but that this is all ok because the few Sony gamers get are designed by Sony themselves?
|
First of all, no, that's not that contention. The contention is IF you are referring to Sony's dominant publishing (as you did to start this thread), what you must be referring to is the quality of Sony's 1st party games. By suggesting that people wrongly trump the SALES of Sony PS3 games, you are wrong, because that's not what people have ever referred to as Sony's dominant publishing.
But now (beaten by the truth of the quality of first party games) you try to switch the discussion to overall high-quality games. But that's a different topic, and if you move to it, you give up on the first one.
Sony gamers get "few" good games? Hah...more than I can play, anyway. Anyway there went The Last Remnant of your credibility.
Also, Leonidas was correct because he's saying that Sony games are of high quality and that we've never claimed that sales were the reason Sony was "dominate" as you put it. And he's right. I think you still quite miss the point.
@Squilliam: good timing on your 'pwned' response. I agree.
