highwaystar101 said:
To be honest that the daily mail/express's fault, they are the most dangerous newspapers in England (I'm a guardian reader, I'm athiest, liberal and correct 99% of the time).
They move on to the next campaign for justice and the next. It was that fucking baby P case that got me perplexed. For a whol fucking minth they were moaning about the death of this baby, victimising the social workers and the doctors that were trying to help. They got loads of people fired from the social services and got that doctior fired (who they were extremely racist against IMO). Now the area baby P came from has a major problem with social services as everyone quit and no-one wants to work for them. To me the daily mail always cause 1000 times more problems than they create... besides I didnt give a shit about that kid, it died and that was sad and tragic, but what made that baby so special, thousands of kids die everyday, they just needed something to sell papers. Also at no point did they ever victimise the three people that actually killed baby. Then they go off on one about immigrants and act extremely racist using words like 'wogs', 'gypos' and 'pakis' andthen go off onone when Jade Goody called Shilpa Shetti, Shilpa popadom.
In case no-one can tell, I fucking hate the daily mail... |
man everything you just said i totally agree with! In my household being called one of the Daily Mail brigade is a massive insult.