By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Tom Chick frags Killzone 2 (says it isn't worth playing)

Who is this guy?



Former something....

Around the Network

How do you people not know who Tom Chick Is?

 

 

Tom W. Chick (born 1966) is an American television and movie actor, and independent journalist. His most prolific TV roles were as Oscar's lover Gil in the US version of The Office, and the hard-hitting reporter Gordon in The West Wing. As a writer, Tom has contributed to many current and past video game publications. He currently functions as editor-in-chief for the Fidgit gaming blog.



PS4 Preordered - 06/11/2013 @09:30am

XBox One Preordered - 06/19/2013 @07:57pm

"I don't trust #XboxOne & #Kinect 2.0, it's always connected" as you tweet from your smartphone - irony 0_o

richardhutnik said:

Tom Chick is a noted videogame review who has been around for YEARS.  Anyhow, he doesn't have kind words for KZ 2.

http://fidgit.com/archives/2009/02/killzone-2-and-the-five-foot-s.php

 

Killzone 2 and the five-foot stare

... I will tell you why Killzone 2 probably isn't worth playing....

It's indicative of how there's nothing creative or engaging or even moderately interesting in Killzone 2. Yeah, sure, it's a great looking game with a hefty combat feel, an intuitive cover system, and lots of blood spatters on the lens to show you're hurt (although the effect is less of being wounded and more of needing windshield wipers). This is an impressive engine and the graphics are - I think I'm prepared to go ahead and say this - the most technically impressive I've seen on the Playstation 3.

But it just kills my interest level that the developers haven't done anything interesting with this wonderful engine. Killzone 2 consist of hemmed in shantytowns, sewers, streets, an industrial area, a bridge, a crane, and even a brief Matrix-inspired lobby. In other words, nothing I haven't seen before. It's atmospheric, with swirling wind, clouds overhead, and lots of smoke and dust, but it's otherwise static, soulless, and entirely uninteresting, the setting for prosaic Call of Duty firefight after prosaic Call of Duty firefight. Exploding barrels and out-of-place exploding electro-spiders are as dynamic as these levels get. I go all the way to a whole other planet, and this is what I find? Retreads of the same places I've been fighting on Earth all along?

(My comment here: In my post on "Why would anyone want to invade Helghast?" I commented that, if the environment wasn't diverse, the game would get knocked as being boring.  Apparently Tom does this here)

The writing is terrible. Godawful terrible. It's slightly better than Too Human and slightly worse than Gears of War 2, which is saying a lot because Gears of War 2 was laughably bad. The Sixaxis gimmicks are just stupid. Stop, Sony. Just stop. You're making the Sixaxis a joke when I have to use it as a pair of grasping hands turning a valve during a firefight. It's even more of a joke when I have to do it after the firefight's over.

 

So, there you go.  The hype backlash has begun.  I wonder how many death threats Tom Chick will receive for writing this.

 

I need to try it, and likely would take issue with Tom, but apparently the game isn't like universally.

 

Credibility died with that poorly worded sentence. He is so professional he can't write an editorial with proper grammar.

 



PC gaming is better than console gaming. Always.     We are Anonymous, We are Legion    Kick-ass interview   Great Flash Series Here    Anime Ratings     Make and Play Please
Amazing discussion about being wrong
Official VGChartz Folding@Home Team #109453
 
ssj12 said:
richardhutnik said:

 This is an impressive engine and the graphics are - I think I'm prepared to go ahead and say this - the most technically impressive I've seen on the Playstation 3.

 

Credibility died with that poorly worded sentence. He is so professional he can't write an editorial with proper grammar.

 

I'm sorry English is not my first language but what's wrong with that sentence?

 



 

Face the future.. Gamecenter ID: nikkom_nl (oh no he didn't!!) 

Well, the only way to disprove someone who disagrees with you is to try and destroy their image =)

"But mainly I'm not interested in writing any sort of formal review because I haven't finished the game yet, and I wouldn't dream of passing judgment on Killzone 2"

He hasn't been able to try multiplayer and he hasn't finished the single player campaign.

Far Cry 2 was his game of the year...


Try to find more people.




Around the Network
ssj12 said:
richardhutnik said:

Tom Chick is a noted videogame review who has been around for YEARS.  Anyhow, he doesn't have kind words for KZ 2.

http://fidgit.com/archives/2009/02/killzone-2-and-the-five-foot-s.php

 

Killzone 2 and the five-foot stare

... I will tell you why Killzone 2 probably isn't worth playing....

It's indicative of how there's nothing creative or engaging or even moderately interesting in Killzone 2. Yeah, sure, it's a great looking game with a hefty combat feel, an intuitive cover system, and lots of blood spatters on the lens to show you're hurt (although the effect is less of being wounded and more of needing windshield wipers). This is an impressive engine and the graphics are - I think I'm prepared to go ahead and say this - the most technically impressive I've seen on the Playstation 3.

But it just kills my interest level that the developers haven't done anything interesting with this wonderful engine. Killzone 2 consist of hemmed in shantytowns, sewers, streets, an industrial area, a bridge, a crane, and even a brief Matrix-inspired lobby. In other words, nothing I haven't seen before. It's atmospheric, with swirling wind, clouds overhead, and lots of smoke and dust, but it's otherwise static, soulless, and entirely uninteresting, the setting for prosaic Call of Duty firefight after prosaic Call of Duty firefight. Exploding barrels and out-of-place exploding electro-spiders are as dynamic as these levels get. I go all the way to a whole other planet, and this is what I find? Retreads of the same places I've been fighting on Earth all along?

(My comment here: In my post on "Why would anyone want to invade Helghast?" I commented that, if the environment wasn't diverse, the game would get knocked as being boring.  Apparently Tom does this here)

The writing is terrible. Godawful terrible. It's slightly better than Too Human and slightly worse than Gears of War 2, which is saying a lot because Gears of War 2 was laughably bad. The Sixaxis gimmicks are just stupid. Stop, Sony. Just stop. You're making the Sixaxis a joke when I have to use it as a pair of grasping hands turning a valve during a firefight. It's even more of a joke when I have to do it after the firefight's over.

 

So, there you go.  The hype backlash has begun.  I wonder how many death threats Tom Chick will receive for writing this.

 

I need to try it, and likely would take issue with Tom, but apparently the game isn't like universally.

 

Credibility died with that poorly worded sentence. He is so professional he can't write an editorial with proper grammar.

 

*scratches head* I'm confused. The part you bolded is actually correct grammar, even down to correct use of the hyphen. Which part is it that you have an issue with?

 



-dunno001

-On a quest for the truly perfect game; I don't think it exists...

Iam playing it anyway so boo hoo



ssj12 said:
richardhutnik said:

This is an impressive engine and the graphics are - I think I'm prepared to go ahead and say this - the most technically impressive I've seen on the Playstation 3.

Credibility died with that poorly worded sentence. He is so professional he can't write an editorial with proper grammar.

Actually, that sentence is perfectly correct, grammar-wise. One could make a case that it's stylistically awkward -not that I would; I use things like this all the time- but there is nothing wrong with it from a grammatical standpoint.



Complexity is not depth. Machismo is not maturity. Obsession is not dedication. Tedium is not challenge. Support gaming: support the Wii.

Be the ultimate ninja! Play Billy Vs. SNAKEMAN today! Poisson Village welcomes new players.

What do I hate about modern gaming? I hate tedium replacing challenge, complexity replacing depth, and domination replacing entertainment. I hate the outsourcing of mechanics to physics textbooks, art direction to photocopiers, and story to cheap Hollywood screenwriters. I hate the confusion of obsession with dedication, style with substance, new with gimmicky, old with obsolete, new with evolutionary, and old with time-tested.
There is much to hate about modern gaming. That is why I support the Wii.

IGN (well respected gaming site) - 9.4

Tom Who? (some guy nobody's heard of) - Not worth playing


Umm I'll go ahead and get it anyways. Thanks for the warning Tom.



1/100 threads for Tom Chick... Who the hell is he?