By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - resident evil 5 ps3 vs. 360 comparison. 360 WINS!!!

blue-lady on 05 February 2009
CGI-Quality said:
@ blue

I'm sorry bro, the differences are minute, it really isn't a big deal though.

I reckon off these shots there is a clear difference, but completely agree that that isn't a big deal.

 



 

 

Around the Network
blue-lady on 05 February 2009
CGI-Quality said:
@ blue

Having both demos in my arsenal works better than screenshots, trust me, there's barely a difference, but this thread was silly from the get go. So yea, I'm not basing arguments off of still screens but actual play time.

I agree.  This thread is just as ridiculous as threads that compare games like KZ2 and Gears 2 and try to suggest there is some massive graphical difference between the two. Or the threads about Burnout looking better on PS3 and Orange Box running better on Xbox 360.

Glad we are on the same page.

 



 

 

Magnific0 on 05 February 2009
Squilliam said:
Neoraf said:
Magnific0 said:
I happened to play both versions of the game, and the difference is this:

the 360 demo is in 1080p... the PS3 demo is in 720p

I was playing on a 42" LCD. It was clear to the eye right away while switching between one console and the other at the same spot in the game. The higher resolution on the 360 made all the differences in texture detail, and shadow detail too. Apart from that, Anti-alias looked slighly better on the 360 demo.

Is the final game going to be like that? I HOPE not. I mean, why the laziness? why this bullshit? After I stopped comparing the demos I started playing DEAD SPACE on PS3, that MULTIPLAT game is 1080p on PS3, so why can't Capcom of all distinguished developers deliver 1080p graphics on the PS3?? I'm saying, hopefully it's just the demo, if not, it sucks big time for Capcom, and whoever has a 1080p HDTV and owns both consoles,will make no mistake about it if better graphics is what they crave.

Wrong.
Dead Space is 720p NATIVE on PS3.

You're talking about "Upscalling it to 1080p".

It also has a better frame-rate on the Xbox 360, the PS3 dipps into the twentys and tweens whilst the 360 version is pretty much locked @ 30. Not a significant difference, given the style of game but its there.

 

Link of video showing this? I haven't experienced this and I have played through BOTH demos more than 20 times.

I'm calling bullshit on your post. sorry.

 



Kantor on 05 February 2009
Baggins said:
ChronotriggerJM said:
@Baggins

It's very weird how it works actually, if you notice, games that were made on the PS3, then ported to the 360, strangely run better on the PS3 o.o; Then games that were made on the 360, then ported to the PS3 have this truly strange nature, of running better on the 360! Games that were made on the PC first, or have separate dev teams for both... have pro's and con's against each other!!!! This isn't rocket science, but at the same time, it's obviously not commons sense, no one ever seems to get the blatantly obvious.

More multi-plats run better on the 360 right? Coincidentally, more games are lead designed on the 360 >_> Fancy that.

 

 Agree 100%

I'm not a deranged fanboy just don't like misinformation.

I was fundamentally disagreeing with Kantor saying its a 50 50 split - It isn't whichever way you look at it.

All I'm saying is that 90% of multiplats are basically identical on PS3 and 360.



(Former) Lead Moderator and (Eternal) VGC Detective

forevercloud3000 on 05 February 2009

WTH? What kind of OP is that? Flaimbait to the extreme.

And I know I cannot be the only one who think they look virtually identical, with only the slightest of differences.

The 360's lights are more intense.
The PS3's shadows are darker.

Neither of these is a graphical feat over the other.

The OP's name is XBOT.......enough said.



      

      

      

Greatness Awaits

PSN:Forevercloud (looking for Soul Sacrifice Partners!!!)

Around the Network
Squilliam on 05 February 2009
Magnific0 said:
Squilliam said:
Neoraf said:
Magnific0 said:
I happened to play both versions of the game, and the difference is this:

the 360 demo is in 1080p... the PS3 demo is in 720p

I was playing on a 42" LCD. It was clear to the eye right away while switching between one console and the other at the same spot in the game. The higher resolution on the 360 made all the differences in texture detail, and shadow detail too. Apart from that, Anti-alias looked slighly better on the 360 demo.

Is the final game going to be like that? I HOPE not. I mean, why the laziness? why this bullshit? After I stopped comparing the demos I started playing DEAD SPACE on PS3, that MULTIPLAT game is 1080p on PS3, so why can't Capcom of all distinguished developers deliver 1080p graphics on the PS3?? I'm saying, hopefully it's just the demo, if not, it sucks big time for Capcom, and whoever has a 1080p HDTV and owns both consoles,will make no mistake about it if better graphics is what they crave.

Wrong.
Dead Space is 720p NATIVE on PS3.

You're talking about "Upscalling it to 1080p".

It also has a better frame-rate on the Xbox 360, the PS3 dipps into the twentys and tweens whilst the 360 version is pretty much locked @ 30. Not a significant difference, given the style of game but its there.

 

Link of video showing this? I haven't experienced this and I have played through BOTH demos more than 20 times.

I'm calling bullshit on your post. sorry.

 

Call it what you want, I don't feel like searching for half an hour to provide proof.

 



Tease.

Garnett on 05 February 2009
Squilliam said:
Magnific0 said:
Squilliam said:
Neoraf said:
Magnific0 said:
I happened to play both versions of the game, and the difference is this:

the 360 demo is in 1080p... the PS3 demo is in 720p

I was playing on a 42" LCD. It was clear to the eye right away while switching between one console and the other at the same spot in the game. The higher resolution on the 360 made all the differences in texture detail, and shadow detail too. Apart from that, Anti-alias looked slighly better on the 360 demo.

Is the final game going to be like that? I HOPE not. I mean, why the laziness? why this bullshit? After I stopped comparing the demos I started playing DEAD SPACE on PS3, that MULTIPLAT game is 1080p on PS3, so why can't Capcom of all distinguished developers deliver 1080p graphics on the PS3?? I'm saying, hopefully it's just the demo, if not, it sucks big time for Capcom, and whoever has a 1080p HDTV and owns both consoles,will make no mistake about it if better graphics is what they crave.

Wrong.
Dead Space is 720p NATIVE on PS3.

You're talking about "Upscalling it to 1080p".

It also has a better frame-rate on the Xbox 360, the PS3 dipps into the twentys and tweens whilst the 360 version is pretty much locked @ 30. Not a significant difference, given the style of game but its there.

 

Link of video showing this? I haven't experienced this and I have played through BOTH demos more than 20 times.

I'm calling bullshit on your post. sorry.

 

Call it what you want, I don't feel like searching for half an hour to provide proof.

 

You should of said "Thats nice and all but Demo's dont really show the true game".



*Remember when the world was supposed to end on May 21st, 2011? Well click here to see our short parody video of it [not]ending*

Magnific0 on 05 February 2009
Garnett said:
Squilliam said:
Magnific0 said:
Squilliam said:
Neoraf said:
Magnific0 said:
I happened to play both versions of the game, and the difference is this:

the 360 demo is in 1080p... the PS3 demo is in 720p

I was playing on a 42" LCD. It was clear to the eye right away while switching between one console and the other at the same spot in the game. The higher resolution on the 360 made all the differences in texture detail, and shadow detail too. Apart from that, Anti-alias looked slighly better on the 360 demo.

Is the final game going to be like that? I HOPE not. I mean, why the laziness? why this bullshit? After I stopped comparing the demos I started playing DEAD SPACE on PS3, that MULTIPLAT game is 1080p on PS3, so why can't Capcom of all distinguished developers deliver 1080p graphics on the PS3?? I'm saying, hopefully it's just the demo, if not, it sucks big time for Capcom, and whoever has a 1080p HDTV and owns both consoles,will make no mistake about it if better graphics is what they crave.

Wrong.
Dead Space is 720p NATIVE on PS3.

You're talking about "Upscalling it to 1080p".

It also has a better frame-rate on the Xbox 360, the PS3 dipps into the twentys and tweens whilst the 360 version is pretty much locked @ 30. Not a significant difference, given the style of game but its there.

 

Link of video showing this? I haven't experienced this and I have played through BOTH demos more than 20 times.

I'm calling bullshit on your post. sorry.

 

Call it what you want, I don't feel like searching for half an hour to provide proof.

 

You should of said "Thats nice and all but Demo's dont really show the true game".

 

 @Squilliam : Thats nice and all but Demo's dont really show the true game

 

and... Bullshit.



WarhawkRules on 05 February 2009

if you played the demo on PS3 you would see that Capcom said that RE5 is still developing and if the game has some bugs that doesn't mean that the FULL game will be like that.



(well, maybe not those exact words but that's the point)



jetrii on 05 February 2009
forevercloud3000 said:
WTH? What kind of OP is that? Flaimbait to the extreme.

And I know I cannot be the only one who think they look virtually identical, with only the slightest of differences.

The 360's lights are more intense.
The PS3's shadows are darker.

Neither of these is a graphical feat over the other.

The OP's name is XBOT.......enough said.

 

Although I have already stated that the difference isn't much, the 360 version does have higher resolution textures, improved shading, and a bit less blurring to cover those textures.  I've gone through all of the comparison pictures, and although the difference is minimal in most, the textures on a few of them is vastly better on the Xbox 360. However, people won't notice unless the 2 copies are running side to side and they have an eye for these things.



Good news Everyone!

I've invented a device which makes you read this in your head, in my voice!