ps4 ftw!
Dianko said: I say no PS4. 4 is an unlucky number in Japan (like 13 in the west), so they'll call it something else. |
Tag (courtesy of fkusumot): "Please feel free -- nay, I encourage you -- to offer rebuttal."
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
My advice to fanboys: Brag about stuff that's true, not about stuff that's false. Predict stuff that's likely, not stuff that's unlikely. You will be happier, and we will be happier.
"Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts." - Sen. Pat Moynihan
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
The old smileys: ; - ) : - ) : - ( : - P : - D : - # ( c ) ( k ) ( y ) If anyone knows the shortcut for , let me know!
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
I have the most epic death scene ever in VGChartz Mafia. Thanks WordsofWisdom!
NJ5 said: I'd guess a 75% probability there will be a PS4. If it does happen, it will be after a massive restructuring and change of strategy at Sony's gaming division.
|
The strategy that Sony had for Playstation has been the same for PS1 and PS2 but PS3 was different they decided to change there strategy and go BIG, so I'd say there going to go back to there old strategy that they had for the PS1 and 2, make something simple, cheap and plays great games.
@aher052
The PS3 has been out for 2 years and 2 months ;)
There's no need for PS4 atm. It's inevitable however.
Gilgamesh said: The strategy that Sony had for Playstation has been the same for PS1 and PS2 but PS3 was different they decided to change there strategy and go BIG, so I'd say there going to go back to there old strategy that they had for the PS1 and 2, make something simple, cheap and plays great games. @aher052 The PS3 has been out for 2 years and 2 months ;) |
You're right, there was some change in strategy for the PS3, but that was mainly in the hardware camp. On the software side, the strategy is pretty much the same as the PS2's (good 1st party games + flagship exclusive or timed-exclusive 3rd party titles like GTA and FF... which as we know Microsoft successfully convinced companies to make multi-plats).
My Mario Kart Wii friend code: 2707-1866-0957
Gilgamesh said:
The strategy that Sony had for Playstation has been the same for PS1 and PS2 but PS3 was different they decided to change there strategy and go BIG, so I'd say there going to go back to there old strategy that they had for the PS1 and 2, make something simple, cheap and plays great games. @aher052 The PS3 has been out for 2 years and 2 months ;) |
so to go back to the 'old stragety' make the ps4 two ps3's duct taped together and its good to go?
PS3, 360 & Wii will all make profit overall before they are killed off.
OK. I am going to be the odd man out.
I say no PS4. The problem: there will be no new gen.
A new gen means a market reset. The cards are reshuffled and anyone can win. This is great for the existing losers. Bad for the current leaders. The leaders have the interest to prolonged the gen as much as possible. Forever is a good timeframe as far as they are concerned. The larger the install base, the more money they make.
At this point, the only platform who would love to have a "do over" is Sony. Everybody else found a successful business model that makes them healthy amounts of money and none of them would like to risk it.
So can Sony do a new gen all alone? NO.
The current HD gen can support excellent titles and with evolutionary improvements to the HW can move forward towards 3DTV, IPTV, DVR and motion controls without changing the foundemental architecture. You will see a Mark II, Mark III etc to the platform, but no disruptive departure from the current architecture.
As far as the developers are concerned it is best to be able to sell to a large install base. A reset and a new gen is bad for them as well. There is just no good reason for them to support a new Sony platform. The cost of current HD titles is already immense and the only way to recup the costs is to sell to a huge base. A new platform will be even more demanding than the current gen and development cost will be even higher and at the same time the installed base will be minimal. Just bad for them all around.
So the potential PS4 will cost much more than the current gen units, will burden Sony with Billions of R&D costs and will have little to no title support.
Even Sony will be able to see that such a PS4 will never make it money. So why start heading down that road?
Prediction made on 11/1/2008:
Q4 2008: 27M xbox LTD, 20M PS3 LTD . 2009 sales: 11M xbox, 9M PS3
well a home console with the name sony on it selling only 45 million would be far from a huge success, especially after what it did with the PS2.
But there will of course be a PS4 and anyone who says there won't be is probably just having some wishful thinking.