it has sold around 400 K  according to this site in the past 2 months.(more than PS3 bioshock which apearently was the reason take 2 had more revenue on PS3 in the last quarter)

Ugh, this thread is a mess. First and foremost, the PS3 is definitely still a worthwhile platform for multiplatform releases. It wouldn't even have to perform on par with the 360: even a 66/33 split would be more than fine. That's how porting works.

Second, all of this data is wrong or misleading. First, Ubisoft did not earn more money on the PS3 than the 360 this last quarter: they did earn more money earlier in the year, which we made a post about 6 months ago. Second, neither is the actual leader.

The DS is, by a wide margin, the largest seller for Ubisoft, generating nearly 50% more revenue than any other system. It is clearly Ubisoft's main platform.

He asserts things he can't back up all the time , it's best just to leave him.

Wow 400k is HUGE in 2 months...NOT...

and Bioshock was out on 360 before PS3 thats why the PS3 version didnt sell..

 The "source" article was really terrible in reporting the data, but can someone provide some article about developers dropping ps3 support?  Since the ps3 would only need to sell more than 10% of total sales to make it breakeven, I'm curious as to why someone would go exclusive, without some incentive from the console maker? 

Naruto Ultimate Ninja Storm has sold 500k copies to date without a japanaese release yet if that helps at all.

or others, for that matter.

So.... I see "Income" in the OP but I'm still not sure. Is this "Net Income" or "Revenue"?

revenue.

I dont wanna sound like a noob, but what does revenue mean? >_>