

Beautiful pictures as always MM. 
iPhone = Great gaming device. Don't agree? Who cares, because you're wrong.
Currently playing:
Final Fantasy VI (iOS), Final Fantasy: Record Keeper (iOS) & Dragon Quest V (iOS)

![]()
| kowenicki said: Is the multiplayer really good?... I'm getting a bit concerned about some of the words in quite a few of the reviews regarding the repetitive nature of the campaign. Luckily I am a self confessed graphics/audio whore so I will still love the campaign, but I usually like to play through more than once....I hope I will want to. |
From the only (major) review that has thus far given it under a 9:
http://www.gamerankings.com/itemrankings/launchreview.asp?reviewid=989085
They gave it an 8.5 despite all that. o_0
And you can also read my preview to see how much I enjoyed the multiplayer:
http://news.vgchartz.com/news.php?id=2544
I hope that with this game, people no longer doubt the awesomeness of Sony's internal studios. =/
All of Sony's internal developers are at the forefront of game design. With Killzone, Sony saw what Guerrilla wanted to do, and what they had the potential to do given the means, so the purchase was made, and thus we have Killzone 2. Sony has a great eye when buying studios. When signing second party contracts, however, they're a bit more liberal. You can doubt any second party titles all you want, lol.
And I hope people believe me when I say something is good. I usually don't spout hyperbolic BS. ;)
So I just got around to reading the Wired review. This line was awesome:
Kotaku's impressions of the singleplayer are up, they're holding off on a full review until they can check out multiplayer. They're probably waiting for it to be packed with people who just brought home the game.
http://kotaku.com/5144855/killzone-2-impressions
*edit* Yea, they're waiting until the game comes out so they can give better thoughts of the multiplayer
"Online could only be played in matches set up through Sony using specific settings on a handful of days. Not that unusual, but I'd rather spend more time with it than base my opinions on such limited play."
| makingmusic476 said: I hope that with this game, people no longer doubt the awesomeness of Sony's internal studios. =/ |
Well I would think the massive investement in the game has had something do with the eventual outcome.. not just Guerilla's expertise...
But SCE are certainly great studios and seem to be improving!
Reminds me of hearing "budget doesn't equal a great game. I could throw tons of money at something and still get crap". Now it's "Well, it had a big budget so obviously it would turn out like this".
Now, I do agree that you'll need the right talent to properly use all that money, but I'm just remembering some arguments against the game over the past few years.
| IllegalPaladin said: Reminds me of hearing "budget doesn't equal a great game. I could throw tons of money at something and still get crap". Now it's "Well, it had a big budget so obviously it would turn out like this". |
What I am saying is that the large budget and help from other Sony studios has been what has allowed them to make such a great game. Though they have to be talented developers, not as good as someone like Insomniac, who can make a game every year with a similar sized studio. It was not like they were a great studio that nobody noticed, they needed quite a lot of help to make this game, but lets hope it is a good long term investement