By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Samurai Warriors 3 teaser trailer

Kasz216 on 17 January 2009

Also... this is just me. I'd map attack to the A button....

Then when in Musou mode switch to first person and use the swinging for powerful musou attacks.

Saves your hands and gives you a more immersive intense expierence when in the heat of it.



Around the Network
Kasz216 on 18 January 2009
axumblade said:
Looking at the Japanese data on this site and it's either incomplete or not really that impressive. :/

incomplete.

Samurai Warriors 2 Extreme Legends is listed at 360K.

It's basically an expansion of Samurai Warriors 2... adding a couple more characters and modes.

 



Kasz216 on 18 January 2009
axumblade said:
Kasz216 said:
axumblade said:
Looking at the Japanese data on this site and it's either incomplete or not really that impressive. :/

incomplete.

Samurai Warriors 2 Extreme Legends is listed at 360K.

It's basically an expansion of Samurai Warriors 2... adding a couple more characters and modes.

 

 

That makes sense. I had never played any of the games but I have heard the name a few times. And I definitely phrased my first post in here like a jackass. Sorry I didn't mean to come off that way lol.

For further info... it appears Samurai Warriors 1 sold 1 million... in Japan alone.

http://ps2.ign.com/articles/506/506924p1.html

No clue what Samurai Warriors 2 sold.  Probably a decent amount close to that if it could do 360K in it's spinoff.

 



Kasz216 on 18 January 2009
halil23 said:
outlawauron said:
halil23 said:
To me it always been Samurai Warriors >>>>>>> Dynasty Warriors.

If SW uses wiimote, I can't see myself swinging for hours non stop!
That a hell of a work out lol.

Agreed. And it seems that in SW you kill a whole lot more people than DW.

Agreed. And I forgot to mention SW seems much less repetitive than DW too!

Well that's because it actually has different enemy types.

What's funny is my girlfriend and I just started a new game in Samurai Warriors right before i read this thread.

 



Acevil on 18 January 2009

Funny How I Am playing Samurai Warriors 2 Empires just as we speak.



 

Around the Network
psychoBrew on 18 January 2009

If it's anything like Samurai Warriors: Katana, then no wonder nobody is talking about it.  That was the worst game I've ever seen (there's alot of other shovelware I'd rather play).  After my experience with Katana, I'm not about to touch anything else in the series.



a3hmax on 18 January 2009

OUTLAWAURON, YUO THINK sw3 it´s gonna be a little better than SW katana or SW2, I just want use as example COD3 and COD5 for WII, the diference is enormous, looks like games for diferent systems, it´s a question of effort and dedication. That´s why i think SW3 will be a lot better, if we talk about Argument of the game ever is the same: Japanese war on feudal period, meanwhile Dinasty Warriors is about Romance of Three kingdoms, and i don´t know why you said the story of the game is bad, because both are incredible extent, and every game just take some fragment from theirs timelines, it´s almos imposible take many books in a game, remember that Romance of three kingdoms games contains more segments form the books, but it´s a lot bored (and I said that being a RPG fan).

HALIL23: I agree, the game should have a optional gameplay like No more heroes, but remenber that´s not necesseary use all your strength in move the cntroller, it´s better be acurrated.

KASZ216: SW it´s a good seller, Wii version don´t sell so much like SW1 because in that moment the systems sold was short, now the instaled base it´s bigger and sales too.



http://www.risingstargames.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=244

http://foros.blogocio.net/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=3827

outlawauron on 18 January 2009
a3hmax said:
OUTLAWAURON, YUO THINK sw3 it´s gonna be a little better than SW katana or SW2, I just want use as example COD3 and COD5 for WII, the diference is enormous, looks like games for diferent systems, it´s a question of effort and dedication. That´s why i think SW3 will be a lot better, if we talk about Argument of the game ever is the same: Japanese war on feudal period, meanwhile Dinasty Warriors is about Romance of Three kingdoms, and i don´t know why you said the story of the game is bad, because both are incredible extent, and every game just take some fragment from theirs timelines, it´s almos imposible take many books in a game, remember that Romance of three kingdoms games contains more segments form the books, but it´s a lot bored (and I said that being a RPG fan).

HALIL23: I agree, the game should have a optional gameplay like No more heroes, but remenber that´s not necesseary use all your strength in move the cntroller, it´s better be acurrated.

KASZ216: SW it´s a good seller, Wii version don´t sell so much like SW1 because in that moment the systems sold was short, now the instaled base it´s bigger and sales too.

Oh I know it will be better than Katana. I would really hope so. I haven't played SW 2 only the first so I can't comment. I'm saying that Koei's iterations of their franchises do not change to much from year to year. They add some characters, flair of the grpahics, and maybe switch up the scenarios but the core gameplay stays the same. Kenbu did have some change from DW 5 to DW6 but that's the exception, not the rule.

Although, I know story quality is subjective and I do not think any of Koei DW, SW, or RotTK games have good stories. You play for the fun and addictive gameplay. You like them, awesome. You won't convince me unless I'm proven wrong while playing.



"We'll toss the dice however they fall,
And snuggle the girls be they short or tall,
Then follow young Mat whenever he calls,
To dance with Jak o' the Shadows."

Check out MyAnimeList and my Game Collection. Owner of the 5 millionth post.

Kasz216 on 18 January 2009
outlawauron said:
a3hmax said:
OUTLAWAURON, YUO THINK sw3 it´s gonna be a little better than SW katana or SW2, I just want use as example COD3 and COD5 for WII, the diference is enormous, looks like games for diferent systems, it´s a question of effort and dedication. That´s why i think SW3 will be a lot better, if we talk about Argument of the game ever is the same: Japanese war on feudal period, meanwhile Dinasty Warriors is about Romance of Three kingdoms, and i don´t know why you said the story of the game is bad, because both are incredible extent, and every game just take some fragment from theirs timelines, it´s almos imposible take many books in a game, remember that Romance of three kingdoms games contains more segments form the books, but it´s a lot bored (and I said that being a RPG fan).

HALIL23: I agree, the game should have a optional gameplay like No more heroes, but remenber that´s not necesseary use all your strength in move the cntroller, it´s better be acurrated.

KASZ216: SW it´s a good seller, Wii version don´t sell so much like SW1 because in that moment the systems sold was short, now the instaled base it´s bigger and sales too.

Oh I know it will be better than Katana. I would really hope so. I haven't played SW 2 only the first so I can't comment. I'm saying that Koei's iterations of their franchises do not change to much from year to year. They add some characters, flair of the grpahics, and maybe switch up the scenarios but the core gameplay stays the same. Kenbu did have some change from DW 5 to DW6 but that's the exception, not the rule.

Although, I know story quality is subjective and I do not think any of Koei DW, SW, or RotTK games have good stories. You play for the fun and addictive gameplay. You like them, awesome. You won't convince me unless I'm proven wrong while playing.

I dunno... the gameplay and stats change more then franchises such as like... Devil May Cry... or many other action genre games.

Samurai Warriors 1 and 2 were actually pretty different from what i remember.

Also the real reason Katana didn't sell was because it was nothing like 1 and 2.... it was an on rails game to my knowledge.



sanadawarrior on 18 January 2009
Kasz216 said:
outlawauron said:
a3hmax said:
OUTLAWAURON, YUO THINK sw3 it´s gonna be a little better than SW katana or SW2, I just want use as example COD3 and COD5 for WII, the diference is enormous, looks like games for diferent systems, it´s a question of effort and dedication. That´s why i think SW3 will be a lot better, if we talk about Argument of the game ever is the same: Japanese war on feudal period, meanwhile Dinasty Warriors is about Romance of Three kingdoms, and i don´t know why you said the story of the game is bad, because both are incredible extent, and every game just take some fragment from theirs timelines, it´s almos imposible take many books in a game, remember that Romance of three kingdoms games contains more segments form the books, but it´s a lot bored (and I said that being a RPG fan).

HALIL23: I agree, the game should have a optional gameplay like No more heroes, but remenber that´s not necesseary use all your strength in move the cntroller, it´s better be acurrated.

KASZ216: SW it´s a good seller, Wii version don´t sell so much like SW1 because in that moment the systems sold was short, now the instaled base it´s bigger and sales too.

Oh I know it will be better than Katana. I would really hope so. I haven't played SW 2 only the first so I can't comment. I'm saying that Koei's iterations of their franchises do not change to much from year to year. They add some characters, flair of the grpahics, and maybe switch up the scenarios but the core gameplay stays the same. Kenbu did have some change from DW 5 to DW6 but that's the exception, not the rule.

Although, I know story quality is subjective and I do not think any of Koei DW, SW, or RotTK games have good stories. You play for the fun and addictive gameplay. You like them, awesome. You won't convince me unless I'm proven wrong while playing.

I dunno... the gameplay and stats change more then franchises such as like... Devil May Cry... or many other action genre games.

Samurai Warriors 1 and 2 were actually pretty different from what i remember.

Also the real reason Katana didn't sell was because it was nothing like 1 and 2.... it was an on rails game to my knowledge.

 

Indeed most warriors game iterations have more changes than most action or sports game series, its just that reviewers hate em so they play it on easy and say nothing has changed and all you do is press x a million times to beat a stage. That said I hope this game is good, but I can't get it because I dont have a wii so unfortunately it seems I will have to go without one of my favorite series after waiting so long... : /