By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - Dear Internet: Quit Overhyping Killzone 2

actually i have to agree with this guy. Granted I think Killzone 2 may be one of in not THE best FPS released so far, there is still a big problem around this game.

It looks fantastic and some of the gameplay mechanics sound unique but seeing the endless threads saying K2 has better graphics than Crysis!!! And K2 is going to change everything for the ps3!! is really starting to hurt the image of the game to me because i realize neither one of those things are going to happen because of K2. Graphically its in all probability the best console game realeased but remember graphics aren't everything. Also while i think it will certainly give the ps3 a boost for perhaps a week maybe 2 it will not make near the impact games like FFXIII and GT5 will



Around the Network
BenVTrigger said:
actually i have to agree with this guy. Granted I think Killzone 2 may be one of in not THE best FPS released so far, there is still a big problem around this game.

It looks fantastic and some of the gameplay mechanics sound unique but seeing the endless threads saying K2 has better graphics than Crysis!!! And K2 is going to change everything for the ps3!! is really starting to hurt the image of the game to me because i realize neither one of those things are going to happen because of K2. Graphically its in all probability the best console game realeased but remember graphics aren't everything. Also while i think it will certainly give the ps3 a boost for perhaps a week maybe 2 it will not make near the impact games like FFXIII and GT5 will

 

If you want to look at the thread titles, maybe. However, if you look into a 'Killzone 2 looks better than Crysis' thread on this site, you'll see that MANY people don't agree and that includes those who are interested in Killzone 2.

 



KylieDog said:
windbane said:
colonelstubbs said:
KylieDog said:
I've said it before I'll say it again. It is a bog standard shooter and its main selling point seems to be graphics. Graphics don't make a game.

 

I hate to annoy anyone, but this is exactly the situation....props to you kylie

 

i just hope you both have played it.

 

 

I would love to hear you explain was is so amazingly revolutionary about this game compared to various other FPS games already released.   Really, do tell. 

 

Does it has some form of co-op that like CoD: WaW or R2? 

Does it has some amazing destruction physics that beats Battlefield Bad Company?

Does it have some entirely new approach to classes not seen before?

Does the cover system do something amazingly groundbreaking that simply ducking behind cover and side stepping doesn't do?

 

Please tell me what KZ2 does to advance the FPS genre in any way.

 

The only thing it really has going for itself is graphics, as far as gameplay elements are concerned it is behind a bunch of games already released.

 

we don't know that yet, the game it yet to be released also halo 3 got hyped and it didn't move the FPS forward either.

they just put up  everything together. with not so good graphics.



IllegalPaladin said:
BenVTrigger said:
actually i have to agree with this guy. Granted I think Killzone 2 may be one of in not THE best FPS released so far, there is still a big problem around this game.

It looks fantastic and some of the gameplay mechanics sound unique but seeing the endless threads saying K2 has better graphics than Crysis!!! And K2 is going to change everything for the ps3!! is really starting to hurt the image of the game to me because i realize neither one of those things are going to happen because of K2. Graphically its in all probability the best console game realeased but remember graphics aren't everything. Also while i think it will certainly give the ps3 a boost for perhaps a week maybe 2 it will not make near the impact games like FFXIII and GT5 will

 

If you want to look at the thread titles, maybe. However, if you look into a 'Killzone 2 looks better than Crysis' thread on this site, you'll see that MANY people don't agree and that includes those who are interested in Killzone 2.

 


I know i debated in most of them and i am one of the people interested in K2 that realizes that Crysis looks much better i'm just stating that the game has unreal hype and its impossible for it (or any game) to live up to the hypetrain around it. Lokk at the backlash that came with Halo 3 and GTA4.

In all honesty, I don't think Killzone is being over-hyped. I know there are fringe elements that claim it is better than Crysis or the best FPS ever, but I don't think that is the general consensus among the PS3 owners. To sum it up properly, we are excited about the prospects of Killzone being a good game.



Thanks for the input, Jeff.

 

 

Around the Network

In all fairness, Xbox owners would be doing the same thing if KZ 2 was exclusive to their system.

You would see so many threads going like 360 more powerful than PS3, all PS3 owners will migrate to 360, best game ever, etc.



My take (as if it is worth much) is that it is one thing to talk up a game to large degree, say you are excited about it and look forward to it. Same with saying that the game deserves to be look at, and you feel it would be awesome. It is another thing to do messages like this that were in the original article this thread talks about below. When you talk like this, you are engaging in counterproductive promotion of a game. Calling people garbage you disagree with, and demanding people call the game, "best game ever" or "best FPS ever" and stating that it is obvious do little to effectively promote and hype a game. And throw in some fragging the 360 for points. It all shows signs of someone who wants KZ2 to be FAR more than just a great game, or even Game of the Year candidate.


Examples from the article this references of comments:

Sasa K.
on January 15, 2009 1:18 am
and what is the same about it? ur presented with the best looking game on any console, a beasty multiplayer, and a feel unlike any other in any FPS genre. Along with a cover system, it plays and looks better then COD4, tell me please, what is the same about gears2 and kz2 to you? pathetic f***ing garbage of a journalist, your the prime sh** example of why just about anybody doesnt deserve to write reviews. ur pathetic.


chesterP
on January 15, 2009 6:04 am
LOL I love to see how xbox360 fanboys are so jealous and so nervous. now I can see xbox360 fanboys playing halo3 and gears2 crying for killzone2 screaming ” but teh attach rate” “but teh price” and xbox360 journalist fanboys saying “but Killzone2 don’t move systems” “but killzone2 is not going to convert xbox owners” “but killzone2 is too gamey” please you journalist fanboys are an embarassement for the gaming industry.



Dan Fry
on January 15, 2009 6:54 am
Oh dear Dan Landis, your article has really caused a stir. Well done for that at least. The article sucks though - bringing a game that is the best in it’s class down to a level of mediocrity.

That’s what has riled 99% of people here. Killzone 2 is something very special, anyone looking at it can see that.

You really should get that Xbox out of your butt and face facts - the Xbox is starting to look a bit dated.


S. Bains (bring back Halo Killer in style!)
on January 15, 2009 9:24 am
this website must be starved of hits, hence this senseless article.

KZ2 will be the best console shooter period, it will eclipse Halo 3, better than COD4 and its an exclusive to PS3 —- XBOX 360 will just RROD when they hear KZ2 playing !!!!





I agree with OP but I really can't see that this title is more hyped than SSBB was, for instance. We'll survive, I'd rather read details on KZ2 gameplay than another Sony bankrupcy/loss/upheaval thread tbh, its pretty much covered already.



NYANKS said:
perpride said:
Let me see if I got this right: KZ2 was announced at E3 2005. It's now almost February 2009 and we are almost about to get the game. You want us to stop hyping it up now?

Send some of those drugs over this way.

 

 Haha, good point.  Can't stop the train now!

From that perspective, it would be like running a marathon, and then tripping over your feet within 100 yards from the finish line.

 



KylieDog said:
windbane said:

 

i mentioned some things, but nice trolling, anyway. lots of the game are better than others, that's the important part, not what's revoluntionary. Not much was new in CoD4 but it was still a great game.

btw, the last several fifa's have improved every year. why don't you list your favorite games and we can troll on them?

sadly, you seem like the kind of gamer that only looks at the back of the box to see what nice names for new features games have rather than how well they are executed.

 

 

This is just weak.

 

I ask what about KZ2 is so amazingly better/new over other FPS games and you failed to list anything. Instead comming up with completely hollow lines like "totally different experience" which anyone can slapped on any game because it doesn't actually say anything at all. Your other answers go on about stuff that many other games do and have done for a long time, which isn't what i asked.

 

...and now because you couldn't give a actual answer to a good question I get called a troll. You not being able to properly answer = me trolling? That is it? No.

 

 

God forbid people question a game.

 

you are questioning a game you haven't played, and I've played for over 100 hours.

I mentioned some things it did different, you ignore it (hence the troll claim).  I said the execution of everything it does, the small part I know from the beta, is done very well and better than other games.  That includes the warzone mode, aiming, weapons, voice chat, options to create servers, unlocking abilities by having some tough tasks, a rather unique implementation of the Saboteur class, a great team dynamic with the different classes and different modes, and nice weapons.  I like that it used FF, but I'm afraid that option will be off by default in the final game.  It's not my job to list every fact about the game, though  I've played a lot of games, and KZ2 is a very good game to me.  If you like team-based online play, then KZ2 is a fantastic game.

It really doesn't matter what I say, though, you don't seem to want the game to be good.  Despite people telling you it's good that have played it, you believe you know better.  I do wonder why you assume it to be bad, though, just because it has very nice production values.