Dude when did I lie? Which bet did I made? Can your brain process more than 2 topics at a time? I made no bet. You must see me and the others users as a single entity. Electoral systems is irrelevant to this thread as the computer science class you took. At least I would not need twesterm to confirm if it is CGI or not if I had a computer science degree.

Lieing is not a word and that is coming from someone who does not live in a english speaking country.

Brazilian, male, political science grad, studying Electoral systems right now. Even a low life form like you can google about it and confirm. Want my Professors name, classes I am taking, my University name? Give me proof about your "computer science" bull first.

I dont know if I have said this before but people are still comparing Super smash bros from 2001 with Super smash brawl that is coming out 2007 and is saying "look how much better it looks". People generally compare the latest games of last gen consoles to the new gen. It seems like comparing MGS2 with MGS4 and try to make argument of it, so its probably better to compare MGS3 with MGS4. So we should atleast compare 2005 games with 2007 games. Wii games does not like last gen but it does not look like "new gen" either. Of course Wii will get much better looking games in the future but it is the same thing with ps3/360. I could have been a bitch and taking a ps2 release game picture and compared it with motorstorm/resistance the difference would have been GRANDE!, but I wont.
( I think that Mario Galaxy looks very good I wich that Nintendo could share their secrets with the other publishers or help them with better tools.)

 Shams went over this already.  Both are early projects for their respective consoles and both are made by the same team with the same content and same style of game.  The comparison is the fairest you can get when talking about comparing graphics from one console to the next.  

The comparison you are referring to only provides a look at how much of an immediate bump in graphics there is, not the difference in graphical power of the two systems. 

When did you lie?  About your age in your profile, you don't remember that?  And you made no bet?  I was referring to the last sentence in your previous post: "I bet...", how do you forget something you just posted?  Seriously I have to ask, can your brain process more than 2 topics at a time?  Hell it seems to have trouble processing even one.

Oh no, it's the dreaded spelling police.  I misspelled a word, thank God we have you here Mr. Spellchecker.  So you were lying about yourself, is that better?

Believe what you wish about me because to be honest I don't care.  Everytime I've given out personal information about myself on the Internet I've regretted it, I posted a picture of myself in the off topic forum before and got insulted and accused of lying about my age, I can't be bothered posting any more information about myself.

Lashing out?  Go back and see who insulted who first.

1) Legend, arguing with you is futile. You did not say that I was lying only about my age, you suggested that I was lying about age, education and nationality.

"so from now on I'm going to try to be honest like my fellow poster "ItsaMii", the 67 year old who is working on his masters degree..."

"Also is lieing about yourself considered funny in Brazil?  Or is being from Brazil a lie as well?"

I already posted on another thread that I was 23. If you are a good enough stalker to know that I am from Brazil you should know I never lied about my age in a thread.

2) Psychological games can be a good weapon if you know how to use it.

... "thanks for confirming that you are a liar, it's the reason I made the remark in the first place and you fell for it like I knew you would, for being so smart you sure are easy to manipulate."

You never manipuled anyone, all you did is make a fool of yourself. I do not remember telling anyone that I was 67, so why do you think you got me when I say I am 23? That is not lying. Lying is:

"I give up arguing, this is my last post on the subject."
and then:
"I took computer science at university so please spare me by trying to make up bullshit claims about me not understanding the difference between cutscenes that are prerendered and ones that are done with the game's engine."

and before you tell me: "I was talking about the CGI subject not about posting"
I say:

"We won't know for sure until the actual game comes out."

3) As for the bet claim, unlike you I can tell when I made a mistake. I though you were talking about a real bet like: If this is CGI when the game come out I will ...
By bet I mean I am more than 50% sure.

4) Come up if your own insults unless you wanna pay the royalties: "Seriously I have to ask, can your brain process more than 2 topics at a time?"

5)
"Lashing out?  Go back and see who insulted who first."
"please spare me by trying to make up bullshit claims"
"so from now on I'm going to try to be honest like my fellow poster "ItsaMii", the 67 year old who is working on his masters degree... Wow."

6) Finally

I am not answering you on this thread anymore. You always drag the discussion off topic and make a lot of personal attacks.

Please! If you don't care then stop replying to their sniping! The attacks on this thread in both directions are inane.

Whole world blind? Heard of it anyone? Fine.

Either way, I think the shots nicely demonstrate how good artwork can overcome limits to technology. 

Links face looks messed up. >_> Kick his ass Fox! ^_^

If nintendo wanted to make CG shots, they would look a lot better than the pictures, and the trailer. Heck you can even see the rough edges. why would a FMV have those if you can completely get rid of them?