Wii fan to developers : make good Wii games and we'll buy them

if you read what I originally said "nobody supported it" then there wouldn't be a need to subtley troll me.

Saying that "nobody supported it" and saying it "bombed" are just slightly different in meaning. One says that it deserved more, and one says that it deserved less. One word off in meaning!

Now when you compare my statement with the OT it says this.

Expensive projects won't continue because cheap projects destroy the venture in terms of profit.

It has possibility that it could be a hugely selling game if not for any reason than boys love insects and lots of boys have wiis.

I'm looking forward to this game. I just hope I'll have the cash to buy it when the time comes.

I was very impressed with this game when i saw a demonstration this summer so i pre-ordered it immediatly

I guess developers should stop making games at all and just produce mini games collections. Such weird logic this developer has, this would lead to another crash. But as many people said, why make GTA4, MGS4, Bioshock, Madworld, if they can get molre money by releasing cheap casual crap. I wish that happened and videogaming ended.

There have been plenty of cheap minigame cash-ins that have crashed and burned in sales.  Just because there are a handful of successful games like this, doesn't mean that they are all successful.

Hey! Watch your tongue young man! A Bug's Life on the PlayStation was awesome! D:

I'm getting de Blob and Deadly Creatures (when it comes out) next time I'm going at the store. Must. Support. Good games!

You realize that "only Solitaire and minigames sell well lol" is just as bad a mentality as "we can make whatever we want and it will sell lol", right? Instead of just assuming that things are black-and-white surface-level simple like that, it's best to actually look at the common traits of that which has succeeded.

Let's look at the top 25 games of all time. How many of them wouldn't be out of place in an arcade? At least 14 of them would be very easy indeed to put into an arcade situation. So what about the other 11? What do Pokemon, GTA, Nintendogs, Brain Training and The Sims all have in common? They're all shining examples of games which give an exceptional level of control to the player, while not compromising the player's ability to enjoy the game in the process of doing so.

So, what does that give us? Two ways to success: highly refined arcade-style gameplay, or games which mesh immense levels of player control with extremely high gameplay fluidity. And even that is a very simplistic analysis; there's far greater depth of understanding you can garner by looking at what those games all have in common, what sets them apart, what makes them stand out from other games, and so forth.

i thought you said the opposite in your first post, my bad if thats not what you meant.
I thought you were trying to say that they should stick to making games that trend and not games that at least some people would enjoy.

I thought that quote was what you were saying. sry :P