Okay so I was just looking at the north america charts and I couldn't help but notice a few things that I found very annoying/disturbing.
first the fact that last week saw more new games released within that one week than several months had all throughout the month. I find this to be very annoying and ridiculous because not only do I not have the money for all the games that I want to play but I also do not have enough time. I mean really would it have been so hard to release new software back in febuarury or march when the only decent title out was Devil may cry 4? or during the summer when the only decent games (for ps3 anyways) were Soul Caliber 4 and Metal Gear Solid 4? and now in this one week Little Big Planet, Motorstorm 2, Fallout 3, Guitar Hero World Tour ect have all been released.
I understand that many of these games might not have been finished back in february, but im sure they could have found some way to space these launches out by a few weeks or a month. Look at the launch line up for december for example, there are hardly any worthwhile new games coming out in december.
You can't tell me that It would have been so hard to wait until december 1st to launch motorstorm 2 when there wasn't so many other titles coming out. It probaby would have sold more than the measly 50k it sold this week too.
anyways I want your honest opinions on this. Would you like to see release dates more spread out evenly across the year? do you beleive that luanching fifty million triple A games in one week is detrimental to the games over all sales due to more competition with other games launching in that week?
note: I only mention ps3 because that is the only current gen console I own and am not too familiar with the release dates of 360 and wii games, I assume though that they follow a similar patern to the ps3.










.