By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - EA uses PS3 now for lead platform

Garnett said:
thejuicingamer said:
did i say anything about the PS2? can you check for me i don't feel like looking thanks.

 

You didnt say anything about it but i did,im also saying the Xbox is a better console than the Playstation 2,but the only reason why the PS2 was ahead in sales is cause they launched a year early,oh yea Xbox 1 had a HDD and Xbox live when PS2 had NOTHING.


PS2 had an online network also

Around the Network
AnarchyWest said:
Garnett said:
thejuicingamer said:

 


 

PS2 had an online network also

 

Yeaa but this is a gimmick. I remember playing MGS3 Substance online when Maestro Kojima announced he wanted to stop it because he wasn't happy with the behavior of the players.. What kind of service is that ? (a free service of course)



 

Evan Wells (Uncharted 2): I think the differences that you see between any two games has much more to do with the developer than whether it’s on the Xbox or PS3.

Who cares? Most EA games suck monkey ballz, Except for Madden and some others here and there. Look at what they did to good old Bond games? After goldeneye on the N64 (Made by the old rare not the shitty one Microsoft now owns) they tried and TRIED to make one just like it but they PHAILED, Seriously EA makes games quicker than when i bust a nut after my girl gives me head, They just make them fast no effort, They just want moneyz.



Too many posts out of topic!



Godot said:
GooseGaws said:
Isn't Activision Blizzard Nintendo the biggest gaming company around?

Anyway, it doesn't matter as most EA games are developed in parallel. They have teams for all versions.

Activision Blizzard is actually the biggest gaming software company, Nintendo is big but not that big. EA is bigger than Nintendo.

I'm pretty sure Dead Space was lead on PS3, so was Paradise. Unfortunately, EA's quality has gone down a hell of a lot and the last game of theirs that I really liked was... let me think... Battlefield 2: Modern Combat on PS2. I never got around to playing Crysis, I don't own a gaming PC.

 

 

 



(Former) Lead Moderator and (Eternal) VGC Detective

Around the Network
-Ghost_MLD- said:
I went over u with this.

WHoever says the one year excuse is admitting that the PS3 brand is on the serious downhill.

It didnt stop the Wii. Fact that PS3 is still last means Sony did something wrong.......many thigns wrong if you read the news posts.

We know Sony did several things wrong. That's why the PS3 is in third place. Had they done everything right, they would be in first with 40 million sales right now. They did not realise that humans, by nature, are cheap. They do not want to pay 600 dollars for a console, especially before it has any games. So, not only did the X360 get all those impatient people who didn't want to wait until November 2006, it got all of those people who put the 'sucks' stamp on the PS3 two months into its release because there were 'no games'. So now, all of those people own 360s, and when things finally look up for the PS3, even when it is a more reasonable 400 dollars, they don't want another console.

Had the PS3 been released on the same day as the X360, it would be in second place. But that's no excuse. The Wii showed that even if you release a year later, you can go into first. Not that I respect Nintendo for doing what they did, but from a business standpoint, they were very intelligent.

It's good that things are looking up for the Playstation, though.

 



(Former) Lead Moderator and (Eternal) VGC Detective

Kantor said:
-Ghost_MLD- said:
I went over u with this.

WHoever says the one year excuse is admitting that the PS3 brand is on the serious downhill.

It didnt stop the Wii. Fact that PS3 is still last means Sony did something wrong.......many thigns wrong if you read the news posts.

We know Sony did several things wrong. That's why the PS3 is in third place. Had they done everything right, they would be in first with 40 million sales right now. They did not realise that humans, by nature, are cheap. They do not want to pay 600 dollars for a console, especially before it has any games. So, not only did the X360 get all those impatient people who didn't want to wait until November 2006, it got all of those people who put the 'sucks' stamp on the PS3 two months into its release because there were 'no games'. So now, all of those people own 360s, and when things finally look up for the PS3, even when it is a more reasonable 400 dollars, they don't want another console.

Had the PS3 been released on the same day as the X360, it would be in second place. But that's no excuse. The Wii showed that even if you release a year later, you can go into first. Not that I respect Nintendo for doing what they did, but from a business standpoint, they were very intelligent.

It's good that things are looking up for the Playstation, though.

 

 

Totally agree..



 

Evan Wells (Uncharted 2): I think the differences that you see between any two games has much more to do with the developer than whether it’s on the Xbox or PS3.