By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Graphics nutters please enter.

@Shio, Killzone 2 Pwns Crysis in Gameplay



Around the Network
shio said:
selnor said:

Just really wanted to show and say to people that Some will think KZ2 is top dog and others like me feel Gears 2 edges it.

Crysis is the Top Dog. KZ2 and GeoW2 are "crappy" looking compared to Crysis, and Crysis makes mince meat out of them.

 

Farcry 2 scales better on high end setups I think the engine nod goes it it.

But hey, Theres always Stalker, and even Oblivion (With mods)/Fallout 3 to give the nod to.

 



Tease.

Btw, is Alan Wake made on a custom engine?

Because really GOW2 isn't the best of the best as far as the 360 is concerned. Mostly due to the fact that they use the UE3 instead of an engine crafted for the single platform.



Tease.

They both look virtually the same in whatever rating system for realism we are using. Meaning why the hell does it matter when the differences are more negligible than unbiased people on this site.



Garnett said:
thekitchensink said:
I'd like to remind everyone that Killzone 2 has been in development since 2005, while Gears 2 probably started in mid '07. So the fact that we can even compare them (even if KZ eventually wins out, which I think it does), speaks to the power of BOTh systems.

Also, I don't know if anyone read the OP without their fanboy goggles on, but he clearly said, "But they are so close that really there is no definitive answer."

 

Too Human 10 years in development that means best graphics ever Confirmed?

 

Oh wait your logic is stupid..

 

Yeah, a game originally in development for the PS1 backs up your argument perfectly.

 

Killzone 2 has been in development since a year before the PS3's launch.  Gears 2 has been in development since 2007.  Case closed.

Also, did you notice how I admitted that KZ2 looks better?  Of course you didn't.



Could I trouble you for some maple syrup to go with the plate of roffles you just served up?

Tag, courtesy of fkusumot: "Why do most of the PS3 fanboys have avatars that looks totally pissed?"
"Ok, girl's trapped in the elevator, and the power's off.  I swear, if a zombie comes around the next corner..."
Around the Network
Zucas said:
They both look virtually the same in whatever rating system for realism we are using. Meaning why the hell does it matter when the differences are more negligible than unbiased people on this site.

 

Yep thats the problem, and now days its easy to tell what certain people on this site perfer....and it pretty much has to do with what system its on, ill never understand, but thats how it is...



thekitchensink said:
Garnett said:
thekitchensink said:
I'd like to remind everyone that Killzone 2 has been in development since 2005, while Gears 2 probably started in mid '07. So the fact that we can even compare them (even if KZ eventually wins out, which I think it does), speaks to the power of BOTh systems.

Also, I don't know if anyone read the OP without their fanboy goggles on, but he clearly said, "But they are so close that really there is no definitive answer."

 

Too Human 10 years in development that means best graphics ever Confirmed?

 

Oh wait your logic is stupid..

 

Yeah, a game originally in development for the PS1 backs up your argument perfectly.

 

Killzone 2 has been in development since a year before the PS3's launch. Gears 2 has been in development since 2007. Case closed.

Also, did you notice how I admitted that KZ2 looks better? Of course you didn't.

Dev time =/ Better graphics...Dev time does NOT Mean better graphics,if that were true then why so many PS3 games get delayed and look worse than 360 games?

and Too Human was built from the ground up for 360...And who cares if KZ2 was in development before Gears of war 2?

Does that make it better graphics i think not,Besides there is no way to claim "best graphics"

IMO

Texture-Gears

Lighting/Shadow-KZ2

Effects -KZ2 (The dust looks amazing!!!)

So I guess KZ2 wins by 1 point.



I was really into that gears cutscene... then I watched killzone for 20 seconds and there really is no comparison. Just watch the gun reload animation... just ridiculous.



"YouR opinion is WronG!!!"

Anyone that thinks the difference between Gears 2 and Killzone 2 is "like night and day" is a fool.

IGN said Gears 2 was the best graphically at E3.

The only significant difference is the level of graphics hype Sony has used for Killzone 2.

Hype many people in this thread have swallowed like gravy.



starcraft - Playing Games = FUN, Talking about Games = SERIOUS

i think gears 2 looks better than killzone 2, both do look great though. i think the colors look sharper in gears and they look alittle drab in killzone 2. i do agree with darthdevidemo1 that heavy rain looks the best so far. alan wake looks great as well, and i feel uncharted can be done without any trouble on the 360. its just a matter of which dev actually takes the time and energy to put out a very polished and balance game, doesnt matter which system. if the dev does that the game will look great.



GAMERTAG IS ANIMEHEAVEN X23

PSN ID IS : ANIMEREALM 

PROUD MEMBER OF THE RPG FAN CLUB THREAD

ALL-TIME FAVORITE JRPG IS : LOST ODYSSEY

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=52882&page=1