By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - First Person Shooter vs 3rd Person Shooter

In general, I can never feel immersed by a third-person shooter. I prefer to 'look through my character's eyes', as it were. The only TPS games I've ever liked have been Gears, RE4, 007: Everything or Nothing, and now Dead Space, but those are some of the highest-quality examples of their genre there are.

Meanwhile, for FPS you've got Halo, Goldeneye, Battlefront (I play it in first-person, anyway), Call of Duty, Perfect Dark, Half-Life, and (to a lesser extent) Resistance, to name a few.



Could I trouble you for some maple syrup to go with the plate of roffles you just served up?

Tag, courtesy of fkusumot: "Why do most of the PS3 fanboys have avatars that looks totally pissed?"
"Ok, girl's trapped in the elevator, and the power's off.  I swear, if a zombie comes around the next corner..."
Around the Network

Both are mediorce as of late... I guess FPS is less mediorce though.



Pixel Art can be fun.

Third-person. First-person feels too limiting.



First person. It's more immersive.



Proud member of the SONIC SUPPORT SQUAD

Tag "Sorry man. Someone pissed in my Wheaties."

"There are like ten games a year that sell over a million units."  High Voltage CEO -  Eric Nofsinger

Both



Around the Network

Well depends on what is the game about. Most FPS are about (spot enemy, shoot him, keep moving, repeat). When the character do something else than shooting, lets say melee combat, sword fighting or climbing walls I prefer third person shooters.
Example: Remember Jedi Knight Outcast? By default, it begins as a FPS. But in the way the player "almost need" to switch to third person view because his going to perform big jumps and later fight with the light saber.
Another example: Tomb Raider. (If Mirrors edge really works EA is going to prove me wrong). Anyway shooting doesn't play such a big role in Lara's adventures, but she can shoot alright.
Another example: RE4. Now, the resident evil series were not shooters until this one came up. But I have to admit that RE4 is a good shooter because it borrows a lot of things from FPS. When Leon Shoots the camera comes really close.

At the end, it may be just a matter of likes. With FPS, I feel like I am inside of a big spacesuit, with little control of the rest of my body (oh surprise, now I see why so many FPS's are space marines). From a third person perspective I can see "my" body so it gives me the feeling that I can use it and do a lot of things with it, apart from shooting.





3rd person, I like to know exactly where my character is plus fp can be quite claustrophobic. MP3 im lookin at you.
I felt more comfortable in 3rd person Metroid than 1st person so that would be my answer



“When we make some new announcement and if there is no positive initial reaction from the market, I try to think of it as a good sign because that can be interpreted as people reacting to something groundbreaking. ...if the employees were always minding themselves to do whatever the market is requiring at any moment, and if they were always focusing on something we can sell right now for the short term, it would be very limiting. We are trying to think outside the box.” - Satoru Iwata - This is why corporate multinationals will never truly understand, or risk doing, what Nintendo does.

TPS is better on consoles, FPS is better on PC. IMO.



I prefer TPSs, as I get some peripheral vision, but in faster paced games, I think FPS is better

I do like seeing my character on screen, and also I think it fits better with games that also include vehicles, so I dont think Halo 3 would have been a bad game to make into a TPS



For consoles I prefer 3rd Person