| forevercloud3000 said:
MS got out of the lawsuite for rumble. I even said this one might have been Sony's own damn fault. But after MS got out of it they purchased 10% of Immersion, in hopes of using Immersion against Sony by hindering them from having rumble. That is why MS was SO pissed when Immersion gave it to them anyway, so they sued them. You do not sue someone for how much money someone has made on a stolen product, you sue them BECAUSE they stole the product. EA,Sony,MS, and even Nintendo are all equally as guilty, if at all. For them to single out sony....at this time.......when Sony is most financially vulnerable is nothing less then a vendetta. Think about it people. We all know about the huge hit Sony has been taking for all PS3s sold. They are DEEP in the Red. These lawsuites come at "just the right time" to really effect Sony. MS feels if they cannot win the console war fair and square, they will just force Sony to bankruptcy. They know this is struggling time for Sony so they send barrage of redundent law suites, all aiming at Sony's biggest deal right now, the PS3. |
That is the funniest thing I have read all week. You only sue someone over the amount of money they have made. If your suit doesn't cover the legal expenses plus whatever extra time you have to put into the suit then you simply ignore it. The cost is greater than the return and thus the whole suit is pointless. Not that I expect any facts to change your mind on this subject, but I feel I have to try.
