libellule said: @sqrl,
"""Nothing anyone has said or will say is going to change the FACT that this is a clearance sale...and a clearance sale is just a temporary price cut. This is just one big game of semantics and it ultimately does not matter. Because even if they lower the 80GB model to $499 this still was not a full fledged price cut."""
==> yes but there are still, at least, 1M of PS3 60gb to sell in NA, so I think this offer will spread on several month (not going to stop in august for sure). And, I dont agree with u, if they lower the 80 gb model to 499$ it will be a TRUE price cut ?
==> In fact, the lights were allready out since a fews days ... It seems u are late to the party ... check the fridge, u may found some chicken. |
I'm not going to get into this price cut issue, but I do want to correct something I think you missread (not that it was very clear to begin with). On the quote you have there about if they lower the 80GB: I was only saying that lowering the 80GB in the future would not make this recent change a full fledged price cut. Lowering the 80GB in the future IS a price cut.... basically i am saying they are two distinctly different price cuts and one doesn't change the status of the other. Not sure if that makes any sense but whatever.
The point I was making that both of you missed was just simply that if both sides of this issue use the most descriptive explanation of their views possible, they would find that its the same view. So I am not sure why you are acting like I am anti-sony..cause I'm not. I'm anti-BS, and there was a lot of it on both sides in this thread.
@Whatever,
The irony of your post is that you claim I have this delusion and then confirm that you do care just by posting about it. If my posts are so inconsequential then I guess there would be no need to reply? You can play hot sh** all you want, but it doesn't change the fact that this thread was going in circles because of folks like you with low reading comprehension not capable of reading a post before replying to it. If you read my post again (you know the one that you even quoted), you will see I said it was a price cut...so yeah I will get right on "dealing with it" ...oh wait...I beat you to the punch.
Perhaps next time you should make sure the person you are arguing with doesn't agree with you already....oops!
PS - @lib, The lights weren't out and sadly still aren't out on this thread, clearly I'm not helping the matter but I am not an asshat who thinks I will lose "cool points" for making sure my views are clearly understood. The "lights out" comment was mostly ment for the folks who were going back and forth and in circles on the issue, really only the first 3 paragraphs were directed at you, and in general I think the parts of my last post you took issue with were poorly written on my part, so I will take the blame on that point.