By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft Discussion - Gamespot reviews Infinite Undiscovery - 6.5

ecurbj on 03 September 2008
BMaker11 said:
ecurbj said:

Regardless, I'm still going to play the game, whether Gamespot changes it score to a 1 or 0...I could care less about IGN or any person in this thread that is talking bad on the game.

How is reviews going to make people think..."oh well there goes another 360 exclusive that sucked because this reviewer gave the game a bad score"...wow so it must suck then...haha 360 owners you got another faulty JRPG"

I mean just by that above what I stated thats what is the problem and the majority of everyone in this thread that is happy that it got the review are not 360 owners.

Wow, seriously just play the game and make your own assumptions instead of listening to some reviewer that probably didn't invest as many hours as possible into the game.

Bashing is a two way street. Lair got it for months, Haze is still getting it. Heavenly Sword got it for almost a year until it finally broke 1 milion, etc. Now it happens twice in a row to the 360, and now everyone's getting upset that they have to get defensive. Welcome to my world in 2007

 

Well to be honest..Lair was hyped!!! Haze was hyped!!! Heavenly Sword was hyped!!!!

Too Human was hyped!!! Infinite Undiscovery wasn't hyped!!!! It was overshadowed by the hype of Tales of Versperia.

 



Around the Network
mrstickball on 03 September 2008

ecurbj -

Buzz wise, I think your right. Tales of Vesperia is the champ of the 2 games (much to my surprise). It quickly went from "Tales seems good" to "Holy crap, ToV is the best Tales game ever!" pretty quickly. Most RPG discussions have been focusing on how great ToV is...

Which took away IU's thunder to "it's out too soon! And I guess it's not as good as ToV...I better change by pre-order..."



Back from the dead, I'm afraid.

BMaker11 on 03 September 2008
starcraft said:
BMaker11 said:
starcraft said:

LOL!!! There is a grand total of like FIFTEEN posts in that thread.  Indeed, most of the threads discussion is about how everyone has FORGOTTEN the game. 

As for MY comments?  How do you think I know so much about the hypetrain (or lack thereof)?  I have ALWAYS had my eye on the title.

Give up buddy, this thread is not going well for you.

 

Need more?

http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=37178

http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=36120

http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=38125

http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=33194

LOL!!!!

You need to stop shooting yourself in the foot mate.  The first three turned into enormous trollfests that consisted of PS3 owners either casting doubt on the validity of pre-order figures or paying the crap out of the game.

The only remotely positive thread is the last one and it has.....wait for it....... SEVEN RESPONSES!!!

You need to start picking threads that help your argument not mine.

 

In what way are threads on this forum that show any sort of "I'm pumped for this game" or "I'm getting this game 100% on day one" helping YOUR argument in any way. Sure, PS3 fans trolled the game, but then again, what did that result in?

"Wow that’s allot and I haven’t even preorderrd it yet. Waiting fore reviews, hope its good but judging by the demo it should be"

"I wouldn't doubt that the Xboxes installed base will support their top games."

"Obviously there is alot of Diablo type fans out there. Too Human is awesome if you like Diablo. Surpassed my personal predictions though. NA will see some good hardware sales for 360 in August due to this game to it looks like."

Those types of responses. You can't ignore them just so you can try and prove your point. Wait a minute, you can. You're the master of spin.



BMaker11 on 03 September 2008

I'll leave now....per the request of other users

 

 

 

hypocrites



ecurbj on 03 September 2008
badgenome said:
BMaker11 said:
ecurbj said:

Regardless, I'm still going to play the game, whether Gamespot changes it score to a 1 or 0...I could care less about IGN or any person in this thread that is talking bad on the game.

How is reviews going to make people think..."oh well there goes another 360 exclusive that sucked because this reviewer gave the game a bad score"...wow so it must suck then...haha 360 owners you got another faulty JRPG"

I mean just by that above what I stated thats what is the problem and the majority of everyone in this thread that is happy that it got the review are not 360 owners.

Wow, seriously just play the game and make your own assumptions instead of listening to some reviewer that probably didn't invest as many hours as possible into the game.

Bashing is a two way street. Lair got it for months, Haze is still getting it. Heavenly Sword got it for almost a year until it finally broke 1 milion, etc. Now it happens twice in a row to the 360, and now everyone's getting upset that they have to get defensive. Welcome to my world in 2007

 

So because some people who owned a different console were dicks to you a year ago, you're going to behave the same way over games some people perceive as disappointments?

Seems like you take this stuff too seriously and personally.

I totally agree dude, he is blowing this whole thing out of his butt. I mean come on he is using the past as an excuse. And since one review came out and it is saying Infinite Discovery is not really that good. He is trying to prove every single 360 owner that "haha...it happens to you guys to...so much for a exclusive JRPG!" it sucks sooo take that"

ummm...BMaker again were not proving anything. You even said they are bashing Heavenly Sword still and it cracked 1 million. Don't be mad that the 360 has more JRPG support than the PS3.

Infinite Undiscovery might not crack 1 million but it would please Namco if it cracks half-million. So sit back and STFU and look at the sales if your soooo concerned.

 



Around the Network
Million on 03 September 2008
mrstickball said:
Million said:
First Too Human , Now Infinite Undiscovery eh ?

We should make a Haze + Lair + TH , IU bundle .

If your arguing reviews, Neither Too Human nor Infinite Undiscovery come to the atrocious scores that Lair or Haze have received.

Infinite Undiscovery 72.3% 6 Reviews
Too Human 69.1% 48 Reviews
Haze 56.8% 54 Reviews
Lair 55.8% 61 Reviews

Maybe it's me, but there's a huge difference between IU/TH scores and Haze/Lair scores. I fully agree that IU and TH are falling into the category of "hyped games that underwhelmed", but nowhere near Haze/Lair levels of awfulness. Lair and Haze were beyond turds. IU/TH have decent enough scores to be "mediocre" or "ok", and not "horrid" or "abysmal" like Haze/Lair.

If anything, it'd be better to put out a Haze + Lair + Two Worlds + Kingdom Under Fire: Circle of Doom, rather than have IU/TH in that mix.

 

 

Damage control all you want but the above are all mediocore games.




Cactus on 03 September 2008
Million said:
mrstickball said:
Million said:
First Too Human , Now Infinite Undiscovery eh ?

We should make a Haze + Lair + TH , IU bundle .

If your arguing reviews, Neither Too Human nor Infinite Undiscovery come to the atrocious scores that Lair or Haze have received.

Infinite Undiscovery 72.3% 6 Reviews
Too Human 69.1% 48 Reviews
Haze 56.8% 54 Reviews
Lair 55.8% 61 Reviews

Maybe it's me, but there's a huge difference between IU/TH scores and Haze/Lair scores. I fully agree that IU and TH are falling into the category of "hyped games that underwhelmed", but nowhere near Haze/Lair levels of awfulness. Lair and Haze were beyond turds. IU/TH have decent enough scores to be "mediocre" or "ok", and not "horrid" or "abysmal" like Haze/Lair.

If anything, it'd be better to put out a Haze + Lair + Two Worlds + Kingdom Under Fire: Circle of Doom, rather than have IU/TH in that mix.

 

 

Damage control all you want but the above are all mediocore games.

 

You should know because you've played them all amiright?



starcraft on 03 September 2008
BMaker11 said:
starcraft said:

LOL!!!!

You need to stop shooting yourself in the foot mate.  The first three turned into enormous trollfests that consisted of PS3 owners either casting doubt on the validity of pre-order figures or paying the crap out of the game.

The only remotely positive thread is the last one and it has.....wait for it....... SEVEN RESPONSES!!!

You need to start picking threads that help your argument not mine.

In what way are threads on this forum that show any sort of "I'm pumped for this game" or "I'm getting this game 100% on day one" helping YOUR argument in any way. Sure, PS3 fans trolled the game, but then again, what did that result in?

"Wow that’s allot and I haven’t even preorderrd it yet. Waiting fore reviews, hope its good but judging by the demo it should be"

"I wouldn't doubt that the Xboxes installed base will support their top games."

"Obviously there is alot of Diablo type fans out there. Too Human is awesome if you like Diablo. Surpassed my personal predictions though. NA will see some good hardware sales for 360 in August due to this game to it looks like."

Those types of responses. You can't ignore them just so you can try and prove your point. Wait a minute, you can. You're the master of spin.

You cut your nose off to spite your face with the ridiculous Kotaku argument, now you're making it worse.

From your threads:

-Thats a lot of people setting themselves up for disappointment.

-So we pass rumours as facts now?

Anyway, from the impressions given from the demo, I doubt the game will be any good.

-Lmao, in their dreams.

-I hope these numbers are correct, however, I anticipate much lower sales numbers near the end.

-This game probably will be better then most haters expect (that one turned out right )

-if this is true then i agree with you, i think this game is going to be just as crap as mass effect

-I call complete BS on this. MGS4 barely had that many preorders.

 



starcraft - Playing Games = FUN, Talking about Games = SERIOUS

ecurbj on 03 September 2008
mrstickball said:
ecurbj -

Buzz wise, I think your right. Tales of Vesperia is the champ of the 2 games (much to my surprise). It quickly went from "Tales seems good" to "Holy crap, ToV is the best Tales game ever!" pretty quickly. Most RPG discussions have been focusing on how great ToV is...

Which took away IU's thunder to "it's out too soon! And I guess it's not as good as ToV...I better change by pre-order..."

 

Exactly my point. Square Enix released it tooo soon...And the pay off is that a lot of factors are into play.

The reviewers could of thinking comparsion between the two games Tales of Vesperia and Infinite Undiscovery the whole time. They could of said Tales of Vesperia has this but Infinite Undiscovery doesn't. So let's knock some points off this game. 

Plus the reviewer more than likely had to quickly review the game. I soooo not trust reviewers anymore. After having some time with Blue Dragon, reviewers were like the game is trash its nothing but recycled content....well according to my taste it was a true first JRPG for a Xbox console to-date. So why bash it as a first try....some people in life need to think before posting, speaking...seriously..



ecurbj on 03 September 2008
Million said:
mrstickball said:
Million said:
First Too Human , Now Infinite Undiscovery eh ?

We should make a Haze + Lair + TH , IU bundle .

If your arguing reviews, Neither Too Human nor Infinite Undiscovery come to the atrocious scores that Lair or Haze have received.

Infinite Undiscovery 72.3% 6 Reviews
Too Human 69.1% 48 Reviews
Haze 56.8% 54 Reviews
Lair 55.8% 61 Reviews

Maybe it's me, but there's a huge difference between IU/TH scores and Haze/Lair scores. I fully agree that IU and TH are falling into the category of "hyped games that underwhelmed", but nowhere near Haze/Lair levels of awfulness. Lair and Haze were beyond turds. IU/TH have decent enough scores to be "mediocre" or "ok", and not "horrid" or "abysmal" like Haze/Lair.

If anything, it'd be better to put out a Haze + Lair + Two Worlds + Kingdom Under Fire: Circle of Doom, rather than have IU/TH in that mix.

 

 

Damage control all you want but the above are all mediocore games.

 

Question...did you play them?

If so, I can understand your post...if not then you can just STFU and move on with life. Because these sort of posts are really annoying. Your basically using what reviewers are saying and believing what they are saying rather than playing through the game yourself...

Thanks for the 1 million same-old-piece-of-shit post I'm use to seeing.