Gamespot reviews Infinite Undiscovery - 6.5

[ecurbj]

Million said:

mrstickball said:

Million said:
First Too Human , Now Infinite Undiscovery eh ?

We should make a Haze + Lair + TH , IU bundle .

If your arguing reviews, Neither Too Human nor Infinite Undiscovery come to the atrocious scores that Lair or Haze have received.

Infinite Undiscovery	72.3%	6 Reviews
Too Human	69.1%	48 Reviews
Haze	56.8%	54 Reviews
Lair	55.8%	61 Reviews

Maybe it's me, but there's a huge difference between IU/TH scores and Haze/Lair scores. I fully agree that IU and TH are falling into the category of "hyped games that underwhelmed", but nowhere near Haze/Lair levels of awfulness. Lair and Haze were beyond turds. IU/TH have decent enough scores to be "mediocre" or "ok", and not "horrid" or "abysmal" like Haze/Lair.

If anything, it'd be better to put out a Haze + Lair + Two Worlds + Kingdom Under Fire: Circle of Doom, rather than have IU/TH in that mix.

 

 

Damage control all you want but the above are all mediocore games.

 

Question...did you play them?

If so, I can understand your post...if not then you can just STFU and move on with life. Because these sort of posts are really annoying. Your basically using what reviewers are saying and believing what they are saying rather than playing through the game yourself...

Thanks for the 1 million same-old-piece-of-shit post I'm use to seeing.