I am also upset with Gamespot.

They said putting this game in your PS3 turns it into a PS2.

Well, I received D3 in the mail today, popped it in, and yet... still is a PS3.

What a bunch of liars.

I didn't read the review, but I don't think games should be judged on graphics, when they are an artstyle, and a conscious choice. Particularly Disgaea, which just wouldn't be right without that classic feel.

This is why reviews mean shit to me. Why let somebody elses opinion sway yours?

It's a good, solid game, with nice graphics for it's Genre.

Metacritic is a bit weird tho with their alphabet scoring.

The Disgaea remake on PSP was scored an 8.0 on Gamespot. Surely if they rated the PS2 version it would have been the same, if not higher.

They rated Disgaea 3 a 7.5. Not a bad score at all but this part causes the score to make no sense to me.

I thought the best of the series nets it a higher score.

*scratches head

Don't worry Euphoria14, it's not the first time reviews don't make sense. Check GameSpot's review for Metroid Prime 3: Corruption. ;)

I think many of these review sites don't know what they are doing half the time.

67 sounds like a fail to me.. It doesn't look like a B-

Ahahaha lol.. They're a bunch of hypocrites. XD

The review for D3 on Gamespot speaks like a game that if not for the graphics, would be an easy 90+ game, just read the great things they say about the game. They say twice that this is the best in the series.

I find it hilarious that the reasoning for Mao to want to overthrow his Father for the position of Overlord is because he accidentally stepped on his Slaystation Portable, causing him to lose 4 million hours worth of progress. I can't wait to continue playing tomorrow.

@Euphoria14

Some reviewers are slightly less scrupulous when it comes to their letter grading systems. They often qualify their own letter equivalent with a numerical equivalent. That still gives them quite the range to fall within. Which always means the composite average will always use the highest possible value rather then the lowest.

My personal opinion is this if these reviewers are so gun shy to use a true system. Well then their review probably doesn't even have any merit regardless. I mean we are talking about a chicken shit strategy here. They are obviously using these letters to hide the true scores so nobody will ever call them on it one way or the other.

The composite rating sites should basically black ball these reviewers. Just stop trying to convert their numbers in the first place. There are more then enough reviewers out there. Why use these reviews in the first place. Why go through the trouble are these reviewers actually lending credibility. Obviously not if they had credibility they wouldn't be trying to use some cockeyed grade school system. What next are they going to start enrolling games in to honor and merit rolls.