flames_of said:
Whoa... That would have been epic
|
Microsoft would have easily beat sony.
flames_of said:
Whoa... That would have been epic
|
Microsoft would have easily beat sony.
Wasn't the Nintendo figure FY 2008 and i believe Sonys FY 2008 is the current one, so there shouldn't be 2008 figures but for Q1.
Anyway, the amount of profit doesn't equal with "money that can be spent on videogames". For example Sony has many businesses, into where the money has to be spent and as a rule, you could say that businesses that make money are worth investing. So, they arent going to give life support for businesses, that aren't making them money.
In order for SCE and M$:s entertainment division to be able to continue, they need to focus on making profit, instead of being moneyholes, so the companys overall profit doesn't have much to do with the money that they invest to games.
Sony has stated that they may not recover the PS3 losses with the system, M$ aims to make profit with 360, which are clear signs, that they won't be investing huge amounts of money for the consoles if you can't get the money back.
Ei Kiinasti.
Eikä Japanisti.
Vaan pannaan jalalla koreasti.
Nintendo games sell only on Nintendo system.
@a12331: I don't know what were you thinking, but Sony has posted negative profits in quite a few years and Nintendo has been making profit since 1889.
Ei Kiinasti.
Eikä Japanisti.
Vaan pannaan jalalla koreasti.
Nintendo games sell only on Nintendo system.
a12331 said:
This is by yearly profits and not overall, so nintendo still has to catch up to sony yearly then it has to beat them for many years
|
I was using sarcasm I know there is no way nintendo could buy sony I was just annoy with all "if who bought who stuff" no one is going buy anybody.Sony does not make enough surplus income too and Microsoft doesn't want goverment to suspect of trying being a monopoly again.
I love fighting games !!! Come on challenge me !
Actually, with a couple more years of profits like Nintendo has had it's quite possible they could buy Sony out via hostile takeover. They don't have enough to cover the 38 billion Sony is worth plus extra for stock holders, but their surplus is enough that if Nintendo wanted to take a stab at it, they aren't too bad off.
You do not have the right to never be offended.
| a12331 said: This thread is to show how much money each company makes a full year. This can show how much they can spend on their repected gaming departments. Microsoft = 17.681 Billion (2008) sony = 3.694 Billion (2008) nintendo = 2.633634 billion (2007) they all made loads of money and looking at Microsoft's profits they can spend all they want.
|
It doesn't really tell you that at all. Nintendo could take on debt if they needed to finance something absurdly expensive. On the other hand both MS and Sony would get out of gaming if their gaming division started to lose as much money as the rest of the company makes.
Sure MS has lost a lost of money over the history of XBox, but they haven't lost $17 billion per year. And while PS3 has lost a lot, they haven't lost $4 billion per year; and even with the losses PS3 did incure heads rolled, if they had been triple what they were and ongoing Sony would have killed its gaming division by now.