By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - The Future of Kingdom Hearts, 360? or PS3?

Torillian on 15 August 2008

Don't deal in absolutes and make yourself look just as dumb as those who say only Grandmothers and little kids buy the Wii, Soriku.

I will agree that the PS3 and the 360 have more hardcore in their userbase by percentage.



...

Around the Network
Obliterator1700 on 15 August 2008
Soriku said:
Obliterator1700 said:
Soriku said:

@321

lol wut? It's a failure because one game of the series never sold 10 million? None of their games sold 10 million.

@outlaw

OK...fine. As long as people don't amont to the typical fanboy garbage they spew out, I'll be fine with it.

@Obliterator


I did read it and there are many wrong points, but at the end the author said IT IS UNKNOWN WHERE IT WILL GO. I don't get why you don't understand.
You should ask yourself that...If its unknown it disapproves of your sig...

 

 

 

WTF...? Can you or can you not read? Seriously. It's like you argue with me to annoy me.

OK, let's keep this simple so you can understand:

The. Article. Says. The. Platform. Is. Unknown. Meaning it can go anywhere.

Got that? Read it slowly.

Second, my sig says I believe it will be on the Wii. It CAN go to the Wii. The platform is unknown, BUT WHEN IT IS ANNOUNCED, I believe it will be Wii exclusive.

Do understand now or do I have to ignore you?

Its useless trying to argue with you...Heres the dictionary if you cant comprehend the two words...

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/unknown

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/disapproved

There you go.

 

 



Obliterator1700 on 15 August 2008
Soriku said:
Obliterator1700 said:
Soriku said:
Obliterator1700 said:
Soriku said:

@321

lol wut? It's a failure because one game of the series never sold 10 million? None of their games sold 10 million.

@outlaw

OK...fine. As long as people don't amont to the typical fanboy garbage they spew out, I'll be fine with it.

@Obliterator


I did read it and there are many wrong points, but at the end the author said IT IS UNKNOWN WHERE IT WILL GO. I don't get why you don't understand.
You should ask yourself that...If its unknown it disapproves of your sig...

 

 

 

WTF...? Can you or can you not read? Seriously. It's like you argue with me to annoy me.

OK, let's keep this simple so you can understand:

The. Article. Says. The. Platform. Is. Unknown. Meaning it can go anywhere.

Got that? Read it slowly.

Second, my sig says I believe it will be on the Wii. It CAN go to the Wii. The platform is unknown, BUT WHEN IT IS ANNOUNCED, I believe it will be Wii exclusive.

Do understand now or do I have to ignore you?

Its useless trying to argue with you...Heres the dictionary if you cant comprehend the two words...

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/unknown

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/disapproved

There you go.

 

 

 

When the article disapprove it going to the Wii again? At the end it said it could go anywhere. That's the whole point of the article. It didn't dissaprove it going to any system.

To have an unfavorable opinion. Come to mind? But then again I cant expect something from someone that doesn't know the definition of the so called word, "former."

 

 



segajon on 15 August 2008

i would guess 360 exclusive, we went through this same argument w/star ocean 4



ctk495 on 15 August 2008
Obliterator1700 said:
Soriku said:
Obliterator1700 said:
Soriku said:
Obliterator1700 said:
Soriku said:

@321

lol wut? It's a failure because one game of the series never sold 10 million? None of their games sold 10 million.

@outlaw

OK...fine. As long as people don't amont to the typical fanboy garbage they spew out, I'll be fine with it.

@Obliterator


I did read it and there are many wrong points, but at the end the author said IT IS UNKNOWN WHERE IT WILL GO. I don't get why you don't understand.
You should ask yourself that...If its unknown it disapproves of your sig...

 

 

 

WTF...? Can you or can you not read? Seriously. It's like you argue with me to annoy me.

OK, let's keep this simple so you can understand:

The. Article. Says. The. Platform. Is. Unknown. Meaning it can go anywhere.

Got that? Read it slowly.

Second, my sig says I believe it will be on the Wii. It CAN go to the Wii. The platform is unknown, BUT WHEN IT IS ANNOUNCED, I believe it will be Wii exclusive.

Do understand now or do I have to ignore you?

Its useless trying to argue with you...Heres the dictionary if you cant comprehend the two words...

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/unknown

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/disapproved

There you go.

 

 

 

When the article disapprove it going to the Wii again? At the end it said it could go anywhere. That's the whole point of the article. It didn't dissaprove it going to any system.

To have an unfavorable opinion. Come to mind? But then again I cant expect something from someone that doesn't know the definition of the so called word, "former."

 

 

Don't waste your time soriku will never change his mind....

 



Around the Network
Obliterator1700 on 15 August 2008
Soriku said:
Obliterator1700 said:
Soriku said:
Obliterator1700 said:
Soriku said:
Obliterator1700 said:
Soriku said:

@321

lol wut? It's a failure because one game of the series never sold 10 million? None of their games sold 10 million.

@outlaw

OK...fine. As long as people don't amont to the typical fanboy garbage they spew out, I'll be fine with it.

@Obliterator


I did read it and there are many wrong points, but at the end the author said IT IS UNKNOWN WHERE IT WILL GO. I don't get why you don't understand.
You should ask yourself that...If its unknown it disapproves of your sig...

 

 

 

WTF...? Can you or can you not read? Seriously. It's like you argue with me to annoy me.

OK, let's keep this simple so you can understand:

The. Article. Says. The. Platform. Is. Unknown. Meaning it can go anywhere.

Got that? Read it slowly.

Second, my sig says I believe it will be on the Wii. It CAN go to the Wii. The platform is unknown, BUT WHEN IT IS ANNOUNCED, I believe it will be Wii exclusive.

Do understand now or do I have to ignore you?

Its useless trying to argue with you...Heres the dictionary if you cant comprehend the two words...

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/unknown

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/disapproved

There you go.

 

 

 

When the article disapprove it going to the Wii again? At the end it said it could go anywhere. That's the whole point of the article. It didn't dissaprove it going to any system.

To have an unfavorable opinion. Come to mind? But then again I cant expect something from someone that doesn't know the definition of the so called word, "former."

 

 

 

I didn't understand this post...at all.

What's the point you're trying to make? And actually say it so I understand.
Its the definition...Is it that difficult to click on the link?

 



321tttrini4everz on 15 August 2008
Soriku said:

@321

lol wut? It's a failure because one game of the series never sold 10 million? None of their games sold 10 million.

@outlaw

OK...fine. As long as people don't amont to the typical fanboy garbage they spew out, I'll be fine with it.

@Obliterator


I did read it and there are many wrong points, but at the end the author said IT IS UNKNOWN WHERE IT WILL GO. I don't get why you don't understand.

@Soriku

wow....i where did i state the word failure bro ??



Obliterator1700 on 15 August 2008
Soriku said:

 The definition of former? I know what former means.

What are you trying to prove?

Rofl...Did the word former have a link to it? Jumping to conclusions so fast are we...

Your comprehension level is rather interesting if you ask me.

 

 



Naraku_Diabolos on 15 August 2008
forevercloud3000 said:
lol, and the saga continues....
Kingdom Hearts is staying where it has always been, PS3.

http://www.gamersplatform.com/2008/08/14/the-future-of-kingdom-hearts-360-or-ps3/

There are just too many reasons on why it should stay.
1. It started on PS2 and customers like to continue a franchise where it started. Yeah, and most PS2 owners already migrated to the Wii. Good thinking.
2. The game's audience MAIN audience lies with the PS3 as real fans want to see massive graphical upgrades within the new title. Nah, not really. Kingdom Hearts 1 and 2 were on the 2nd most graphically inferior console of last gen with GAMEPLAY, not cut-scenes (with DreamCast being the 1st).
3. Tetsuya Nomura (an known PSFanboy) is the developer of the game. So? It's not him who says where it goes, it's Disney's, as they hold more of the share of the KH IP.
4. The game also holds characters that Sony holds liscences too such as the FFVII cast. These characters have become key to the story so it would be akward to take them out No, Sony just PUBLISHED FFVII. They don't own jack-shit with that game.
4. Disney stands to only gain by further inforcing the game on PS3 as they are one of the biggest investors in Blu Ray. Yeah, but Disney favors Nintendo more, as their games have sold the most on it. Plus Disney had opened another branch of Disney Interactive that works exclusively for Nintendo.
5. 360 users dont really like RPGs, hense none of them sell too well... They have average sales, while the PS3 and Wii hardly have any at this point.
6. Wii is too technologically inferior to give fans of the series what they want, motion controls would be a minus to the gameplay. Nope, because both of the first KH games were on a technically inferior consoles (PS2). The Wii is at least 4.5 or whatever as times as powerful than the PS2. Motion controls with the Motion Plus for the Wii would be better than Sony's lame and tacked on motion controls for SIXAXIS (they were better as to just have rumble than a last minute decision, but no, Sony's marketing is just as retarded as this post).
7. Becuase it only makes sense lolz XD No, because you don't make sense because you sound like a blind fanboy who doesn't know anything of the ethics of owning a license for a gaming IP, technology, favoring a company due to how their game sells and whatnot. Stop where you are, or Soriku will butcher your post more than I did.

 

 



Obliterator1700 on 15 August 2008
Soriku said:
Obliterator1700 said:
Soriku said:

 The definition of former? I know what former means.

What are you trying to prove?

Rofl...Did the word former have a link to it? Jumping to conclusions so fast are we...

Your comprehension level is rather interesting if you ask me.

 

 

 

Aha...lowering to quick jabs without giving me the point you're trying to make. Nice. All this arguing has amounted to what...nothing? WTF are you trying to say to me? Spit it out.
Its pointless...I wont simplify it to where it sounds like I'm speaking to  a 7 year old.  Read over my posts, maybe you'll understand what my point is.