By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - 360 DVD better then PS3 Blu Ray for Gaming

souixan said:
Fishie said:
slimeattack said:
Anyone who thinks that blu-ray drives are slower check wikipedia.

 

 Just did, the wikipedia page does NOT mention any comparisons between dual speed blu ray and 12 speed DVD so I dont know why you mention it here as some sort of proof that BD is faster.


 

Well okay let's do it this way, the spin speed is NOT an accurate way to determine read speed. As discs store more the info is more dense meaning it can read more by spinning less.

in effect a 1x DVD rom reads 10.5 MB/s a 1x Blu-ray drive reads 36MB/s by definition a blu-ray drive is about 3 times the read speed of a DVD drive.

Have some arbitrary rotation speed info! For a 12x dvd-drive Approx. 7,070 rpm (DVD-ROM single layer) Approx. 5,180 rpm (DVD-ROM dual layer) is expected. A 2x BD-drive spins at about 1,700RPM.
this means little to nothing on the read speed honestly the read speed is mostly dependant on the disc density and the capability of the drive. By definition a BD-drive reads faster but rotates slower reducing noise.

in perfect honesty the PS3s constant read speed with a 2x BD-drive is slower than a 12x DVD-drives -max- read speed by a little bit. I believe about 40mb/s but it is faster than a DVD-drive minimum read speed by about 15mb/s

Had Sony put a 4x drive in the PS3 the read speed on the PS3 would constantly surpass the 360's read speed.

Edit: Even if Xbox360's read speed for DVD-DL discs like stated above is only 8X even that would exceed a 2x BD drive at max read. This time the difference would be about 72mb/s for Blu-ray and about 90mb/s for DVD-DL however again BD wins over the minimum read speed for an 8x DVD by about 22 mb/s

Edit2: Let mes stress I say even if because I'm almost positive a DVD-DL read speed is about 2/3 of a DVD with a single layer due to reduced rotation speed. However not knowing exact specs for the 360's drive I will not say with 100% certainty.

What you say here has already been disproven a few posts up from your post so I really dont understand why you took the trouble to spend so much time writing that are flat out wrong.

 



Around the Network
Saiyar said:
Fishie said:
Saiyar said:
Nickelbackro said:
slimeattack said:
Anyone who thinks that blu-ray drives are slower check wikipedia.

Ps3 Blu-Ray drive @ 2X = 72Mbits/S

Xbox 360 DVD Drive @ 12X = 127Mbits/S

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DVD (check Speed chart for a 12X drive)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blu-ray (Check speed chart for a 2X drive)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ps3 (check the hardware section for drive speed)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xbox_360_hardware (check section on drive speed)

You Sir Fail

The 360 DVD drive is only 8X for DL discs.

 

 

 Where did you get that from?

 

As far as I am aware pretty much all DVD drives read DL slower than SL. Here is the FAQ for the Hitachi GD7500. For reference the Hitachi drive in the 360 is the GD3100 which is an older model.


Those are reader/writer drives. Can you show me something that shows the same for read only drives?

Pristine20 said:
gebx said:

First off let me say that its way better to see a movie on Blu Ray then on DVD. But this thread (and video consoles) isn't about movies but games.

Games are getting bigger and more complex, the pinnacle of video gaming on the PS3 console is currently MGS 4. The game is a masterpiece in many ways. Its a game that we all know would take multiple DVD's if it ever goes to the 360. I personally believe it will be a PS3 exclusive forever! But let's pretend the game does make it to the 360 and 360 users are forced to switch disc each act of the game. This would be seen as a negative on the 360... but is it?

Well let's compare!

- 360 users would have to switch disc 4 to 5 times, wasting about 30-45 seconds per switch
- PS3 users have to install new acts 4 times, wasting 1-3 minutes per install

I'm not even counting the 8 minute install needed at the start of the game, but it does seem that a 30-45 sec "switch" is less intrusive then a 3 minute install. I see no reason why this trend isn't followed in other big complex games such as FFXIII. PS3 users arn't complaining and 360 users are even getting the option in the upcoming patches. In the end it comes down to gamer's preferences, so I ask...

What would you prefer?

 

*MGS 4 install time http://dlb-network.com/2008/06/metal-gear-solid-4-install-time-break-down/

The thing about the install is that it could've been done once if sony didn't put a limit on gamedata. Frankly, its not that hard to upgrade a ps3 HD and its easy to delete old gamedata so they shouldn't have put a limit.

Secondly, dvd only works for games that can use multiple discs like adventure games,etc. Imagine a racer like GT5 with all its content, how would it be possible for a racer to span multiple discs?

 

 

 Again, Gran Turismo2 came on multiple discs.



Retrasado said:
lol @ this thread.

Still, kudos to souixan for setting everyone straight.

 

 Urm, he didnt set anything straight.

His assesment is just plain wrong.



Stupid article, why don't we use cd?



Around the Network
Fishie said:
Saiyar said:
Fishie said:
Saiyar said:
Nickelbackro said:
slimeattack said:
Anyone who thinks that blu-ray drives are slower check wikipedia.

Ps3 Blu-Ray drive @ 2X = 72Mbits/S

Xbox 360 DVD Drive @ 12X = 127Mbits/S

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DVD (check Speed chart for a 12X drive)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blu-ray (Check speed chart for a 2X drive)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ps3 (check the hardware section for drive speed)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xbox_360_hardware (check section on drive speed)

You Sir Fail

The 360 DVD drive is only 8X for DL discs.

 

 

 Where did you get that from?

 

As far as I am aware pretty much all DVD drives read DL slower than SL. Here is the FAQ for the Hitachi GD7500. For reference the Hitachi drive in the 360 is the GD3100 which is an older model.


 

Those are reader/writer drives. Can you show me something that shows the same for read only drives?

That is a read only drive.

 



Saiyar said:
Fishie said:
Saiyar said:
Fishie said:
Saiyar said:
Nickelbackro said:
slimeattack said:
Anyone who thinks that blu-ray drives are slower check wikipedia.

Ps3 Blu-Ray drive @ 2X = 72Mbits/S

Xbox 360 DVD Drive @ 12X = 127Mbits/S

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DVD (check Speed chart for a 12X drive)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blu-ray (Check speed chart for a 2X drive)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ps3 (check the hardware section for drive speed)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xbox_360_hardware (check section on drive speed)

You Sir Fail

The 360 DVD drive is only 8X for DL discs.

 

 

 Where did you get that from?

 

As far as I am aware pretty much all DVD drives read DL slower than SL. Here is the FAQ for the Hitachi GD7500. For reference the Hitachi drive in the 360 is the GD3100 which is an older model.


 

Those are reader/writer drives. Can you show me something that shows the same for read only drives?

That is a read only drive.

 

You are right, my bad sorry.

 

Saw DVD-R there and wrongly assumed it was a read/write drive while it simply stated the speed at which it reads those.

 



Mr.Y said:
souixan said:
Mr.Y said:

I MISS CARTRIDGES.


 

Me too, no moving parts, lower power consumption. Almost completely devoid of load times except for a few scarce exceptions. The ability to add chips to assist main processors etc. I sometimes wonder if with all the advances in flash memory if we'll ever see a cart based system again in the future.

 

It'll never happen because of cost to produce them.

 

 

Except flash memory today is much cheaper and far more flexible than ROM memory of the past. DS is a testament to that. Originally PSP touted a higher storage space for games but DS has surpassed it and the games are cheaper to purchase, generally speaking of course.

Fishie said:
Retrasado said:
lol @ this thread.

Still, kudos to souixan for setting everyone straight.

 

Urm, he didnt set anything straight.

His assesment is just plain wrong.

 

 

Okay then if it's wrong prove me wrong. I'm only going from specs on tech sites and from manufacturers. It's not to say the 360 outperforms the PS3 and I'm not going on bias. To be quite truthful the 12x speed might be moot anyway as most 360 games are DL anyway.

 

Edit: If I'm wrong I'll happily retract my statement and gladly admit to it, but I'm pretty confident in most of what I said. I should note I still give the battle to the 2x blu-ray drive because it reads higher density discs more effeciently as most DVD's need to be dual layer for the more modern games with bigger graphics.



gebx said:

First off let me say that its way better to see a movie on Blu Ray then on DVD. But this thread (and video consoles) isn't about movies but games.

Games are getting bigger and more complex, the pinnacle of video gaming on the PS3 console is currently MGS 4. The game is a masterpiece in many ways. Its a game that we all know would take multiple DVD's if it ever goes to the 360. I personally believe it will be a PS3 exclusive forever! But let's pretend the game does make it to the 360 and 360 users are forced to switch disc each act of the game. This would be seen as a negative on the 360... but is it?

Well let's compare!

- 360 users would have to switch disc 4 to 5 times, wasting about 30-45 seconds per switch
- PS3 users have to install new acts 4 times, wasting 1-3 minutes per install

I'm not even counting the 8 minute install needed at the start of the game, but it does seem that a 30-45 sec "switch" is less intrusive then a 3 minute install. I see no reason why this trend isn't followed in other big complex games such as FFXIII. PS3 users arn't complaining and 360 users are even getting the option in the upcoming patches. In the end it comes down to gamer's preferences, so I ask...

What would you prefer?

 

*MGS 4 install time http://dlb-network.com/2008/06/metal-gear-solid-4-install-time-break-down/

 

I have not read any of the replies, so sorry if this has been mentioned before.

The 360 DVD is faster then the PS3 BD. But there are two flaws with this post.

1. BD is a format, the PS3 is an implementation of that format. There is a strong argument that the 360's implementation of DVD is better then the PS3's implementation of BD. That does not mean BD is bad. A 4X BD is faster then the fastest DVD. BD's are much more scratch resistant, which is good for Games (especially if you rent of buy used). BD is the future, and one MS will embrace the next time around.

2. While the DVD is faster then BD, it is far slower then the Hard Drive. MGS4 was written with the understanding that the data would be streamed off the hard drive. There is nothing to indicate that this would not also be required for the 360, even with the optical drive being a little faster.

 



souixan said:
Mr.Y said:
souixan said:
Mr.Y said:

I MISS CARTRIDGES.


 

Me too, no moving parts, lower power consumption. Almost completely devoid of load times except for a few scarce exceptions. The ability to add chips to assist main processors etc. I sometimes wonder if with all the advances in flash memory if we'll ever see a cart based system again in the future.

 

It'll never happen because of cost to produce them.

 

 

Except flash memory today is much cheaper and far more flexible than ROM memory of the past. DS is a testament to that. Originally PSP touted a higher storage space for games but DS has surpassed it and the games are cheaper to purchase, generally speaking of course.

Fishie said:
Retrasado said:
lol @ this thread.

Still, kudos to souixan for setting everyone straight.

 

Urm, he didnt set anything straight.

His assesment is just plain wrong.

 

 

Okay then if it's wrong prove me wrong. I'm only going from specs on tech sites and from manufacturers. It's not to say the 360 outperforms the PS3 and I'm not going on bias. To be quite truthful the 12x speed might be moot anyway as most 360 games are DL anyway.

 

Edit: If I'm wrong I'll happily retract my statement and gladly admit to it, but I'm pretty confident in most of what I said. I should note I still give the battle to the 2x blu-ray drive because it reads higher density discs more effeciently as most DVD's need to be dual layer for the more modern games with bigger graphics.

 

 There are no DS games bigger in memory footprint then a PSP UMD holds, you are comparing bits to bytes there.

A 1gig DS game will be less then 1/8th the size of a psp umd.

 

The read speeds have been linked to by others in this thread and are att odds with what you say, not much I can add to that.