By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft - 2 New Star Ocean 4 Screens + Artwork

mrstickball said:
Pristine20 said:
mrstickball said:
Earlier question about disc size and RPGs:

For BD and LO (I own both, mind you), the reason they were 3-4 disks wasn't due to the size of the games, but entirely due to the cutscenes. Both games had at least 1hr, if not close to 2hrs, of HD cutscenes. Since HD cutscenes take up, oh, 3-4x more memory than an SD cutscene...You can fill a regular size DVD very quickly (which is why many PS3 games, ala MGS4, have many cutscenes).

About "who needs FF", my reasoning is that SO4 looks awesome. Everyone bills the Final Fantasy series as some sort of un-touchable mammoth of a series. However, SO4 looks awesome, and is actually taking a Sci-Fi approach to the RPG genre, rather than a half-cocked one that FF and other carbon-copies take. This makes me excited that we might see a game do Sci-Fi right.

Half-cocked? For starters, SO3 started off looking sci-fi but ended up with the main character crashing on a medeival planet and using swords and guns anyway in typical FF-type scenarios so in a way, its also somewhat of a carbon copy. Secondly, FF is highly respected as a series because it created the JRPG crowd that now exists today. I preferred SMT:DDS & DDS2 to FF12 but they are all excellent games so there's no need to put one down to praise the other.

 

 

 

I'm referring to the oh-so many (especially FF anymore) "industrial/magical revolution" ideas that seemed to begin when FF6 came about, that mix magical devices with rennisance-era machinery. I'm getting sick of it all, really. Even LO was that way. Either give me Fantasy (FF9, Tales of) or Sci-Fi (Mass Effect, Phantasy Star)

Both FFXIII and SO4 have one thing in common: both are going to be the most scifi-oriented games in their respective series

 



Around the Network
steven787 said:
FTR, usually I prefer FF but I did buy 12, and 12 did suck. Production qualities are great in 12 and get 10/10. The gameplay 7/10. The graphics in game 8/10. The fun factor and story 4/10.

 

12 didn't suck bro. Lemme tell ya, and this is what I use irl to talk to FF haters about, and don't take anything personally, I'm drunk, and I honestly don't hold anything against people who didn't like XII and VIII.

 

I have inside information on this subject. At first, I also hated FFXII, FFTactics, Vagrant Story, and FFVIII.

Then, after a long time had passed, I found myself going back to them just to give them another day in the sun, and this time, going strictly by a guide to finish the games(or multiple guides to be more precise).

 

I found that in all of those games, you needed to play a certain way from the very start to get that feeling of power and level increasing that you found in other games. Once you learned how the games were meant to be played(which I didn't learn in any of my initial playthroughs) they actually have very complex and rewarding battle systems.

 

For instance, the first step in VIII begins before you even head to the cave to defeat Infrit, where you should stand around outside and draw 100 fires, 100 cures, and 100 blizzards, which you can then junction to make yourself much more powerful. The purpose of FFVIII is basically to do limit breaks for every move in combat. Did you know that you can get to the end with only gaining like 1 level? It has a very high entry barrier, but with help, you'll have an amazing time with the game, I promise you this.

 

The thing about final fantasy is, it's never what we expect it to be. It's never gonna be FFVII or FFVI again(essentially the game game, despite perception of ff fanboys).

However, the new games are amazing as well, most people just get a bad first impression and never really learn how the game is meant to be played.

 

I'll be the first to say, FFXII has an average story and terrible character development. However, if given time, it has one of the best gameplay systems ever in a game. It's as good as Vagrant Story and FFTactics.

Believe it or not, that gameplay element has more than enough power to drive you through the whole game, it's very diablo 2 esque, which means that I clocked over 105 hours in the game and never even beat the weapon.

 

When I hear most people say FFXII sucks, or FFVIII sucks, I been there bro. I was right there with you, but luckily for myself, I had the feeling one day to say, "You know what, even though I thought it sucked, I bet there is something good there for me," and I went back and played it and I had the time of my life.

 

So, you can bet FFXIII isnt' gonna be what you, or most sony fanboys expect. However, there will be something there for me, and if that thing is as substantial as it was in FFXII, then I consider myself very lucky, because despite popular opinion and freshness of current games, FFXII still really blows MGS4 and GTAIV out of the water, when it comes to gameplay, depth, and sheer available playtime and fun.

That's the difference between the immediate gratification demanded by american gamers, and the subtle excellent tones perscribed by the best Japanese developers.

 

The most obvious exception is RE4, which despite its excellence is a very "american" japanese game.

Those are just my sentiments. I'm, again, very drunk.



I don't need your console war.
It feeds the rich while it buries the poor.
You're power hungry, spinnin' stories, and bein' graphics whores.
I don't need your console war.

NO NO, NO NO NO.

@ZenfoldorVGI
Ageed. The story was great at first but after 10 hours, gets less interesting. The main characters other than Bathier weren't very interesting. The game is still great though. Why? Because the battle system is fun and gameplay is very enjoyable and very deep



Zen, you may be a drinker, but you are now my favourite person (this may not make sense unless you've seen the Adam West Batman move).

Well said. Very well said.



pearljammer said:
Zen, you may be a drinker, but you are now my favourite person (this may not make sense unless you've seen the Adam West Batman move).

Well said. Very well said.

 

lol, sadly what I said is something you can't understand until you've hated a game, and then went back to play it again, and found something really special. It's not something that can be told or descirbed. It is very much an experience, and because of that, it is all the better for those who experience it, but very frusterating for those of us who feel the need to explain.

 

edit: btw, thank you, I very much appreciate the compliments.



I don't need your console war.
It feeds the rich while it buries the poor.
You're power hungry, spinnin' stories, and bein' graphics whores.
I don't need your console war.

NO NO, NO NO NO.

Around the Network
Pristine20 said:
swyggi said:
@Pristine20

Easy now, control the anger.

The number of people rising to the "insult FF occasion" is just ticking my nerves! Its almost as if I alone bought the 5 mil copies of FF12 lol.

 

Oh no, I bought it but havent touched it since about 20 hours in. What I found when you get past the graphics is a shallow meaningless game. I will be playing FF13 at my mates before I dive into another wasted hle in my pocket.

 

 



Riachu said:
sc94597 said:
FF used to be my favorite rpg series, but after they made XI an mmo, and XII horrible(imo) I don't have to much hopes for FFXIII. Now I'm finding alot of rpgs that are better than my favorite FF(VI) and I think the series is overrated. Especially by people who never played an FF game. Also I don't like the direction the series is taking, they are focusing too much on the visuals, and characters and forgetting the game play a lot of the time. FFXII had almost nothing that would distinguish it as a final fantasy and I really hope they go back to the roots with FFXIV. Also why is shiva a motorcycle? Seriously. I hope the series does become as good as I use to think it was again. As for star ocean, I never played it, but this does look like it will be quality, and It COULD be better than XIII to some. Aslo at the person who said " there are many action-adventures to play other than zelda. There aren't any that play the same. Okami is similar to zelda, but different, metroid prime 3 is really different from zelda, Uncharted the same, and GTAIV also the same. So there isn't anywhere else where you could get the zelda experience, but there are many rpgs that take the FF style. So I think you should use another example.

FFXII is still a FF game at heart.  Sure, the story isn't as good and the main characters, with the exception of Bathier, are bland but the game is still great because of its gameplay

 

The gameplay was the main reason why I hated it. FIrstly I like turnbased rpgs better than real time ones. Secondly The gambit system was horrible imo. I felt like I wasnlt playing the game.

 



Wait a minute. Why are some of you guys so damn excited for the FOURTH entry into an RPG series? mrstickball, have you ever played SO1/2/3? I mean, you obviously are very excited for this game, and looking at your games list, you clearly have a PS2. So you must have played the game, not liked it enough to add it to your games list, and yet are mysteriously excited for the fourth entry. Or you have never played it, and are getting excited about the fourth game in an RPG series for no particular reason. I mean, forgive me if I'm wrong, and you loved SO3 and just never added it to your list, but from what I can tell, it's one of the 2 scenarios I presented.



Bitmap Frogs said:
Torillian said:
Bitmap Frogs said:
Aw man, every 360 jrpg thread gets trolled by guys just spamming FF13FF13FF13 all over.

Anyways, that dragon shot might be in-engine cutscene but I doubt it's a gameplay shot, it's just way too good looking. Now here's hoping there's more sc-fi stuff in the game instead of being stuck in backwater primitive planets for most of the game.

 

Hard to bitch about that kind of thing when your OP calls out FF. That's like me putting up an R2 thread, flippantly saying that it's quality makes GeoW unnecessary, and then bitching about people telling me I'm wrong.

Sigh....I need to follow my own advice to Pristine it seems.

 

Sure the OP might have called it for this thread, but just check back - there's plenty of jrpg topics on this forum without mentions to FF that had "the usual suspects" raining all over it with FFF13FF13FF13 all 360 jrpgs don't matter FF13FF13FF13.


As an RPG fan I would take LO,BD,ES,SO4,IU,TLR,TOV and ME ove FF13 anyday. All those games are exclusive to 360 in one way or another.

 

 



Riachu said:
pearljammer said:
sc94597 said:
FF used to be my favorite rpg series, but after they made XI an mmo, and XII horrible(imo) I don't have to much hopes for FFXIII. Now I'm finding alot of rpgs that are better than my favorite FF(VI) and I think the series is overrated. Especially by people who never played an FF game. Also I don't like the direction the series is taking, they are focusing too much on the visuals, and characters and forgetting the game play a lot of the time. FFXII had almost nothing that would distinguish it as a final fantasy and I really hope they go back to the roots with FFXIV. Also why is shiva a motorcycle? Seriously. I hope the series does become as good as I use to think it was again. As for star ocean, I never played it, but this does look like it will be quality, and It COULD be better than XIII to some. Aslo at the person who said " there are many action-adventures to play other than zelda. There aren't any that play the same. Okami is similar to zelda, but different, metroid prime 3 is really different from zelda, Uncharted the same, and GTAIV also the same. So there isn't anywhere else where you could get the zelda experience, but there are many rpgs that take the FF style. So I think you should use another example.

 

First bolded: Uh, are you sure you have that the right way? FFXI and XII focused very little on character and very much on gameplay and is partially responsible for the the game(s) ill response. I would argue most love FF for its characters, its stories, and its overall atmosphere for that reason alone.

Second bolded: That isn't what I said. Please do not misquote me. The OP said that while having SO4, who would need FF. Now if you had played SO, you would know that it isn't much like FF at all, other than they are both RPG's. I just simply said that the two comments were analogous in that both series offer distinct playing experiences.

Third bolded: Sure you can say that FF has more clones, I certainly wouldn't argue. Typically, what seperates FF from other RPG's are its characters, its worlds, story, but rarely its gameplay. Hell, most RPG's play the same, namely turn-based RPG's. Experience and style are very much two different things. I don't think there is anywhere else I can get either a FF or Zelda experience but there are many games where I can see their style:

FF- Lost Oddyssey

Zelda- Shadow of the Colossus, Dark Cloud

I think the example is more than adequate.

Agreed. Lost Odyssey is the closest we have to a JRPG that has the same style as FF

 


Probably because the creator of FF is the creator of LO