By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Sonic Unleashed Wii ( Screenshots comparision inside )

DMeisterJ on 13 July 2008
MadHatter said:

The Second and Fourth images look fine to me. The other two are obvioussly scanned from some printed source (magazine probably).

Btw, from the second pic I can tell that Sonic boy visited some Greek island!  

The second and fourth pic are from the 360 version.



Around the Network
Onimusha12 on 13 July 2008

1st pic - Magazine scan
2nd pic - 360
3rd pic - Magazine scan
4th pic - 360



MadHatter on 13 July 2008
DMeisterJ said:

The second and fourth pic are from the 360 version.

It's not possible to have such a big difference. Check how Mario&Sonic looks.

Do not panic! This difference is only because the 'wii' images are scans from second or third source material (who knows). Can you imagine how this quality would look if you stretch it to fill a TV screen? There will be a blur thing with no clarity at all. Even if the quality of Wii is lower than XB360 these small size images should look almost identical in this 72-dpi resolution. 



Master Mii Artisan 

DTG on 13 July 2008

Looks awful on the Wii, I`m expecting a bomb unless there`s severe polishing done after this.



TheRealMafoo on 13 July 2008
MadHatter said:
DMeisterJ said:

The second and fourth pic are from the 360 version.

It's not possible to have such a big difference. Check how Mario&Sonic looks.

Do not panic! This difference is only because the 'wii' images are scans from second or third source material (who knows). Can you imagine how this quality would look if you stretch it to fill a TV screen? There will be a blur thing with no clarity at all. Even if the quality of Wii is lower than XB360 these small size images should look almost identical in this 72-dpi resolution. 

 

Oh com on, are you saying that if the devs used all the power of the 360, and all the power of the Wii, they will get a game that looks the same?

In these screens the 360 looks a LOT better, and I am sure when the game comes out, it will look a lot better.



Around the Network
sc94597 on 13 July 2008
DTG said:
Looks awful on the Wii, I`m expecting a bomb unless there`s severe polishing done after this.

I'm not seeing it bomb. Look at previous sonic titles/titles with sonic sales on the wii.

Sonic and the Secret Rings

Mario & Sonic at the Olympic Games



L.C.E.C. on 13 July 2008
Onimusha12 said:
Either way the Wii version is the only version that will sell any copies one way or another, I don't even know why they bother making HD versions of the game.

Well, apparently Sonic The Hedgehog (2006) became a platinum... as shitty as it was/is (I bought it for $10 and it's the worst Sonic game yet...):

Platinum Hits is a term used to refer to a line of select Xbox games that have sold over 400,000 units on the platform in the nine months after release

So, I guess there is a reason to release it on HD.




SnesTea on 13 July 2008
Soriku said:
A mod locked my thread...and mine was first too! ;(

Oh, I see how it is.

 

 

Don't be a post count whore Soriku.



MadHatter on 13 July 2008
TheRealMafoo said:
MadHatter said:
DMeisterJ said:

The second and fourth pic are from the 360 version.

It's not possible to have such a big difference. Check how Mario&Sonic looks.

Do not panic! This difference is only because the 'wii' images are scans from second or third source material (who knows). Can you imagine how this quality would look if you stretch it to fill a TV screen? There will be a blur thing with no clarity at all. Even if the quality of Wii is lower than XB360 these small size images should look almost identical in this 72-dpi resolution. 

 

Oh com on, are you saying that if the devs used all the power of the 360, and all the power of the Wii, they will get a game that looks the same?

In these screens the 360 looks a LOT better, and I am sure when the game comes out, it will look a lot better.

No, what I'm saying is that even if the XBox has higher resolution than the Wii, these SMALL SCREENSHOTS (at 72dpi - this is the resolution we have in our PC/MAC monitors) should look nearly the same - because after this resizing all the details would blend and the final image would look about the same, no matter if one of them came from a higher resolution...

 

 

 



Master Mii Artisan 

TheRealMafoo on 13 July 2008
MadHatter said:
TheRealMafoo said:
MadHatter said:
DMeisterJ said:

The second and fourth pic are from the 360 version.

It's not possible to have such a big difference. Check how Mario&Sonic looks.

Do not panic! This difference is only because the 'wii' images are scans from second or third source material (who knows). Can you imagine how this quality would look if you stretch it to fill a TV screen? There will be a blur thing with no clarity at all. Even if the quality of Wii is lower than XB360 these small size images should look almost identical in this 72-dpi resolution. 

 

Oh com on, are you saying that if the devs used all the power of the 360, and all the power of the Wii, they will get a game that looks the same?

In these screens the 360 looks a LOT better, and I am sure when the game comes out, it will look a lot better.

No, what I'm saying is that even if the XBox has higher resolution than the Wii, these SMALL SCREENSHOTS (at 72dpi - this is the resolution we have in our PC/MAC monitors) should look nearly the same - because after this resizing all the details would blend and the final image would look about the same, no matter if one of them came from a higher resolution...

 

It's not the resolution. It's the lighting, the textures. It's still very hard to make a video game look like real life, even at 300x300 resolution. That has nothing to do with pixel count, and everything to do with all the other effects needed to make things look great.

The 360 has more capability to do these other things (lighting, shaders, AA, etc)