The top three are the only games that sold ok/well. Two casuals one and a hardcore one...But if I see whole that chart it is almost saying that the hardcore and casual games ( UBISOFT games) are not selling well on the Wii.

 Kind of. I'm trying to say that they are wrong when they assume wii owners are buying these games in the other threads. They just ignore it in the other threads so I made a thread about it. 

@Konnichiwa: And thats the point, they aren't selling cause they are crap.

Well...people are always talking about how series will move to the Wii because the development costs will be relatively less expensive. Don't you think that Dogz is probably a lot cheaper to make than RRR, even if it doesn't sell as well?

Exactly, Ubisoft is making new Rayman Raving Rabbids and Petz games on the Wii. They know what sells. It's a lot easier and most likely cheaper to make a Petz game than a game like No More Heroes. And since it's definitely faster, than can get more profit faster, allowing them to keep their quarterly revenues up. As for Red Steel, I don't know how well a sequel would sell. I think a lot of its sales had to do with it being the only other shooter at the Wii launch besides Call of Duty 3 (a series Wii owners aren't accustomed to). And Red Steel had far more advertising.

Ubisoft has a strategy and it's very unlikely they will change it.

Besides the 360, ubisoft games dont sell well on most consoles. I know, AC sold well on ps3.

This thread is made to reply to all posts like this one
"
If Wii owners are buying Ubi's crap, what incentive is there for Ubi to create good games for the Wii? "

It's not wii owners fault because as I have shown , the games aren't selling.