no way he can play all those games in 2-3 hours a night.
I'm betting he plays 3-4 hours every night and on weekends, 5-6 hours.

 I know, I don't own anywhere near as many console games and even I spend way too much time gaming...

well even if he tried to play them all, some games are just not worth playing, so i guess he just collects them.

Also, 375 (247+129) games on a 3 year lifetime (or 26 280 hours for 3 full years) that is a max played of 70 hours per game....
then considering he plays 3 hours a night, that still gives him 8.76 hours per game (or a new game every 3 days).

If I had that many games i'd probably play dominoes with the.

 Games that are rated below 6 out of 10 as a review average over 50 review sites  are generally not worth playing. The cash in movie/tv series video games are generally the worse games available.

That's like between $15 and $20 thousand just in the current gen 360 stuff sitting there. Wonder what this guy does for a living.

I'm not really sure what the problem is here. I mean, I'll play on my PS3 and then go on my Windows XP computer. Other than some fan issues with our TV, our Sony TV shows a suburb picture and it's a great choice for doing things in high-def.

Who but a true fanboy would figure it even matters that the games are played on a Sony TV, or that it should be a strange thing. I have a Wii and an Xbox 360. And a 52" LCD Sony Bravia TV. So what of it? What is that supposed to mean?

Oh, maybe that I am not someone that only buys something because of the brand name on it.

And yeah, like some people have mentioned, there is no way he's even played all of those games.  Or else he's played only a tiny bit of all of them.  I play 2-3 hours of games a night, more on weekends, and I can't keep up with the 50 or so games I have of my current gen systems.  I have about 2 dozen games queued up, that I really want to play, but haven't gotten to yet. 

lol, that's alot of sales tax.

We've found madskrillz!