By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Gears of War: Details and Disappointments

The Gears of War 2 trailer released just a few days back had people in a mixed mood since the scale and style of

the cinematic effects failed to provide the visual high that people had been expecting from one of the more hyped games in recent

times.
Of course, that’s a strange statement to make in an industry run on hype, but even so, expectations had been high

for the visuals of Gears 2. But there might be hope yet.



There’s a lot of argument in place right now about which game is the best looking, and the videos of each successive game demo are

judged more mercilessly than the finalists at any skin-show… erm… beauty pageant. Killzone 2 was under siege when it turned out

that the gameplay trailer shown back at E3 2005 was pre-rendered, an artist’s conception of the entire game. At the time everyone

was laughing and taking potshots at Sony and how smoothly it could handle cutscenes! E3 ‘07 proved that the visual quality did

indeed match up and silenced the critics a lot though.

Something similar happened with Gears of War 2, the game got people excited when they saw Unreal 3.5 being shown

off at GDC in February and the teaser trailer made fanatics drool over the endless possibilities over the sequel of one of the

best action titles in the 360’s lineup.


So when the gameplay trailer released on May 9th, people felt, well, a little cheated.



But here’s the thing. Looking at scans from Gameinformer’s latest issue, and comparing them with the visuals in the

footage released, it looks like the build used in the gameplay trailer is an older build of the Unreal Engine. It looks like the

demo was shown on an early build
, and here’s the reason why:

The gameplay shown doesn’t make use of features shown off in Unreal 3.5, be it ambient occlusions, or meat cubes,

the realistic water effects. The level of detail was sort of bland,
so I decided to check in a few really high resolution

scans from GI (which had been confirmed as in game screenshots) as evidence, and I found an essential component of Marcus Fenix

missing all throughout the video - his vicious scar, which has been quite evident in almost all versions of Gears of war, is

somehow… missing.





These scans are real-time images since they have certain peculiar moments which make them a little off the track as pre-rendered

images.

1) Blood splatter in the screens.
2) Half a leg of an enemy locust which has been laid to rest.



The level of details on the enemies in the trailer was also significantly lower than what was shown off in the

scans.


The direct feed screen of one of the character models, released a few days after the magazine scans released on the

Internet also has a great amount of detail when it comes to facial expressions, wrinkles and shadows have been painstakingly

recreated, to give a very high poly count model. These were however absent from the gameplay trailer.
Both the scans and

the screenshot make explicit the tattoos, which actually seem to be done with striking realism.

Fenix even looks punier in the screens from the trailer than in the scans, and his character model seems

significantly less detailed,
the bandana for instance has more wrinkles in the scans than in the direct video screenshots

taken at 720p.

The moral of the story is that we wait and watch till E3 2008 when CliffyB will showcase a brand new gameplay trailer with a

much updated engine, but until then, we can wonder…


All the images are taken from either the gameplay trailer released or the scans from GameInformer.

Via Splitscreen

___________________

 YOUr thoughts.....will GEOW 2 NOT take away the GOTY 08 awards anymore?



All hail the KING, Andrespetmonkey

Around the Network

Why wouldn't it be a GOTY anymore? All they do is whine about the graphics... Man, the graphics are AWESOME!!! Hardly any games that surpass it. But even if it would look worse than the original, then so what? It's about the gameplay, man.
And if the gameplay is good, the graphics can be as good or bad as they like.



All I have to say is: WICKED!

Now just toss in 4-p splitscreen plz



Could I trouble you for some maple syrup to go with the plate of roffles you just served up?

Tag, courtesy of fkusumot: "Why do most of the PS3 fanboys have avatars that looks totally pissed?"
"Ok, girl's trapped in the elevator, and the power's off.  I swear, if a zombie comes around the next corner..."

Since Fenix's model looked better in the tech demo, I'm guessing they simply didn't have this level finished yet in UE3, and so they programmed that segment quickly in UE2. Even in UE2, I'd have said it looked almost as good as Killzone 2, but we will see with the final game.



Could I trouble you for some maple syrup to go with the plate of roffles you just served up?

Tag, courtesy of fkusumot: "Why do most of the PS3 fanboys have avatars that looks totally pissed?"
"Ok, girl's trapped in the elevator, and the power's off.  I swear, if a zombie comes around the next corner..."

Who said it didn't look good?

I thought it looked fairly amazing. It had more color and it drew A LOT of screen while doing it all at above 30 FPS (or at least that's what it looked like). Saying it only had as good as graphics as Gears 1 isn't a bad thing since that game looked pretty damn good too.

Also, I don't know when the video was made but anything that GI got was probably made 3-4 months earlier.



Around the Network

"I found an essential component of Marcus Fenix missing all throughout the video - his vicious scar, which has been quite evident in almost all versions of Gears of war, is somehow… missing."

This is very odd. Why is a vital piece of the main characters appearance absent?

In general though, I thought the graphics in the trailer looked great.

It's possible the new version of the Unreal Engine wasn't complete before Gears 2 went into production, so some of the new effects may be missing.

Although I'm sure Epic could probably add them at a later date.



 

I think the only disappointment here is the crappy cut/paste job done on the article with all the colours, underlines, and font changes you did....



Proud Member of GAIBoWS (Gamers Against Irrational Bans of Weezy & Squilliam)

                   

Dallinor said:
"I found an essential component of Marcus Fenix missing all throughout the video - his vicious scar, which has been quite evident in almost all versions of Gears of war, is somehow… missing."

This is very odd. Why is a vital piece of the main characters appearance absent?

In general though, I thought the graphics in the trailer looked great.

It's possible the new version of the Unreal Engine wasn't complete before Gears 2 went into production, so some of the new effects may be missing.

Although I'm sure Epic could probably add them at a later date.

Maybe part or all of Gears 2 is a prequel to Gears 1 and explains how he got the scar.

Anyways, I wasn't disapointed at all with the gameplay trailer, it looked like fun to me, but then again, I've never been one to count pixels or polygons or whatever.



Currently Playing:  Saints Row 2 | Battlefield 2 | Company of Heroes

Recently Beaten: Gears of War | Super Mario Galaxy | Darwinia | MGS4 | Sam and Max Ep. 4, Portal | Mirror's Edge | Uncharted | Mass Effect

Looking Forward to: Alan Wake | Splinter Cell : Conviction | The Last Guardian | Batman: Arkham Asylum | SMG2 | Mass Effect 2 |

@gebx

chill out.....just because you favorite game has disappointed a journalist doesn't mean you should take your anger out on other members..



All hail the KING, Andrespetmonkey

dont know why you are bothering with 360 games when you play a ps3. could it be boredom. or just downright envy methinks the latter