After Switch owners complained about the superhero comedy Dispatch forcing censorship on the newly released Nintendo versions of the game, Nintendo released a statement denying that it was directly responsible for this decision.
The statement (per GoNintendo) reads: "Nintendo requires all games on its platforms to receive ratings from independent organizations and to meet our established content and platform guidelines. While we inform partners when their titles don’t meet our guidelines, Nintendo does not make changes to partner content. We also do not discuss specific content or the criteria used in making these determinations."
At the time of the Switch release, Dispatch developer AdHoc stated that it "worked with Nintendo to ensure the content within the title met the criteria to release on their platforms, but the core narrative and gameplay experience remain identical to the original release." But after Nintendo's statement, who to blame for covering Dispatch's naughty bits up is unclear.
Some purchasers of the Nintendo versions of Dispatch have claimed to have gotten refunds, pointing out double standards as games like Cyberpunk 2077 have released on Nintendo platforms without such censorship. But it's worth mentioning that, at least in the case of Cyberpunk, there are distinct regional versions of certain games--the Japanese version of Cyberpunk, rated Z by Japanese rating board CERO, lacks nudity and extreme gore
Source: Gamespot
------------
Apparently, the censorship goes as hard as putting "black squares" over explicit things. Well, that's weird. I mean, we have things on Switch that are much worse than Dispatch, like Cyberpunk 2077 as it was stated in the news. So what exactly is the problem here?









